[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Free These Women
/* Written 11:26 pm Feb 28, 1994 by DEBRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in igc:hrnet.women */
/* ---------- "Free These Women" ---------- */
## author : ctn-editors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
## date : 27.02.94
-------------------------- CanTibNet Newsletter ------------------------
Published by: The Canada-Tibet Committee
Editorial Board: Brian Given <bgiven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nima Dorjee <amnesty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Conrad Richter <conradr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tseten Samdup <tibetlondon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Submissions and subscriptions to:
ctn-editors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or fax to: +1-905-640-6641
Send us your comments, announcements, news or items for discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued ID: 94/2/27 21:00 GMT Complied by: Tseten Samdup
---------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE THESE WOMEN
Join our campaign for Human Rights
Nobel Peace prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi has been under
house arrest for almost five years for voicing opinions that
the authorities in Burma do not want to hear. She is must
one of many women throughout the world who have been
imprisoned because of their opinions or beliefs. They have
all shown great courage despite risk to themselves and to
their families. Non of these women has been involved in or
has encouraged violence of any kind - nor have they been
given a fair trial. Help us to fight for their cause by
joining amnesty International's campaign for their release.
[The magazine' special focus on women under arrest features
four prominent human rights campaigners - Burma (Aung San
Suu Kyi), China (Gao Yu), Tibet (Rigzin Choenyi) and Cuba
(Maria Elena Aparicio). This is a women's magazine
published in different parts of the world.]
TIBET
Following a history of threatened independence, Tibet fell
to the Chinese for the second time in 1950. Nine years
later, an uprising was brutally suppressed, and Tibet's
leader the Dalai Lama, was forced to flee to Nepal. Last
year, the Chinese announced a crack down on pro-
independence groups, especially monasteries.
The number of known detainees in Tibet went up by 30 per
cent last year. Many will be 're-educated through
labour'.
(Photo of Rigzin Choenyi)
RIGZIN CHOENYI
23, Drapchi Prison, Lhasa Tibet
On 22 September 1989, when Rigzin Choenyi was nineteen,
she and five other Buddhist nuns from the Shungsep
nunnery in Lhasa gathered on the pilgrim age path that
doubles as the market place in central Lhasa. Together
they shouted slogans about the issue that remains central
to their lives: that Tibet should be independent, free
from Chinese rule.
The women were arrested soon afterwards. According to the
official newspaper, Tibet Daily they had 'broken martial
law regulations'. (Martial law had been declared in the
city in March 1989 after three days of unrest. It was
lifted in May 1990.) This period, however, has nothing to
do with the number of prisoners who are detained in
Tibet. Rigzin was sentenced to seven years'
'imprisonment', which she is believed to be serving in
Drapchi, the largest prison in Tibet. Very little is
known about the condition and whereabouts of political
prisoners currently held in Tibet. In May 1993 EC
ambassadors visited Drapchi and were shown the common
areas. When they asked to visit a 'reform through-labour'
camp they were turn ed down. Early in the visit, they
heard that three Tibetans, who were said to have compiled
information to give to the delegation, had been arrested.
When the ambassadors asked for an explanation and to meet
the prisoners, they were told by the Chinese authorities
that the arrests were unconnected to their visit.
Most details about the conditions in Tibet come from
those who have been released, and who have made the long
journey, across the Himalayas, to Nepal. They can never
return to their homeland while the Chinese remain in
power. One of these 27-year-old nun Sonam Drolkar,
described six months of brutal torture, which brought her
close to death before she escaped in 1991.
Sonam Drolkar was held in solitary confinement for 300
days without charge or trial. She had no mattress or
blanket, was handcuffed 24 hours a day and received
medical treatment only when the prison doctor warned that
she would die without it. Wire was wrapped around her
body at the beginning of each 'interview', and
electricity would be switched on if she failed to answer
questions. By the time she lost consciousness, her body
would be burnt, and when she came round, it would be
blue. This happened every other day for six months. Sonam
was sexually violated with an electric baton, and beaten
she believes, with iron rods, but she cannot be sure
because she lost consciousness so often. The torture
party consisted of both women and men. After six months
she began vomiting blood and when, after about ten
months, she was allowed out of solitary confinement, her
eyes were dam aged and she could not face daylight.
Told that she faced life imprisonment, she was offered
freedom in exchange for names of activists. ' denied
knowing anybody, but this time was so sick that she v
admitted to the police hospital, wh doctors took the view
that there v little point in treating her as was about to
die.
Sonam was told that if she co raise the money, she would
be transferred to a better hospital. Altho~ it is almost
impossible to raise fur in Tibet, where people have no
more to spare, the funds were found c she was moved. When
fit enough Sonam made her escape to Nepal. The escape
route for Tibetans another test of human endurance is
largely made on foot and can take months - frostbite is a
common hazard and the Nepalese border guards are not
always compliant. It could not be done without secret
support of other Tibetans. Since Sonam's arrival in
Nepal, she has received help from various international
groups.
The Tibet Support Group in London campaigns for the
Tibetans' right choose their own future, and it h
gathered a horrific catalogue of torture techniques used
on political prisoners: cigarettes are stubbed out their
skin, and electric-shock baton are used on the mouth, on
the neck and in the anus. Often the prisoner's feet are
wetted to increase the sever of electrical impact.
Beatings can lc from sunrise to sunset, during which time
prisoners receive no water, a their only food is two
small lumps tinned momo (plain dumplings).
There are five blocks at Drapchi each one with about
thirteen cells holding between 75 and 100 prisoners. Of
these, approximately six inmates will be Chinese, the
rest Tibetan. In 1989, a new block was built especially
for political prisoners, and it is believed that Rigzin
Choenyi is now in her fifth year in Block Three - the
women's unit. Of the nuns arrested with her, Choenyi
Lhamo, Sonam Choedron and Konchok Drolma were sentenced
to three years Gutsa detention centre, where they were
're-educated through labour'. According to unconfirmed
report Konchok Drolma was given a further two-year
sentence.
Although the Foreign Office holds a list of those
political prisoner causing most concern - it includes
Rigzin's name - they are reluctant single out one
particular prisoner, preferring to deal with the issue
collectively. 'We try to form a joint position in the
European Community over the question of political
prisoners - as group we carry more weight,' said a
spokesman. 'Whenever we have high-level visitors in
China, we take the opportunity to refer to the plight of
the prisoners. We like to think the Chinese response has
changed they listen to us now, which makes change from
ten or fifteen years ago. But these things take a long
time.'