[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Subject: Re: Your mail to moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Would it be possible to have somewhat fewer of these spurious postings in
the old mailbox, Chum?? Many thanks, Hamilton.
On 2 Feb 1995 MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Your e-mail message to: moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> could not be delivered because the recipient's account is
> no longer active.
>
> The headers of your message follow:
>
> >From notes@xxxxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 3 01:48:30 1995
> Received: from cdp.igc.org (cdp.igc.apc.org) by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA15783
> (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>); Fri, 3 Feb 1995 01:48:30 -0500
> Received: (from notes@localhost) by cdp.igc.org (8.6.9/Revision: 1.190 ) id NAA23546 for "conf-reg.burma"; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 13:42:16 -0800
> Date: 31 Jan 1995 09:07:49
> Reply-To: Conference "reg.burma" <reg.burma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: cfink@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Karen refugees flee fighting
> To: Recipients of conference <reg.burma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.90.950131090454.21127D-100000@sol>
> X-Gateway: conf2mail@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Errors-To: strider@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Precedence: bulk
> Lines: 107
>
>