[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Pol. & Econ. Role of Indonesian Mil
- Subject: Pol. & Econ. Role of Indonesian Mil
- From: cd@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 13:57:00
Subject: Re: Pol. & Econ. Role of Indonesian Military
It is not without concern for the particular curiosities of east asian
governments to engage in a spiraling arms race for which this item is
passed on in the hope not to offend strict burma obervors. metta dawn
star
Subject:
Pol. & Econ. Role of Indonesian Military
Date:
Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:54:52 -0500
From:
wharker@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Harker)
Reply-To:
ipe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To:
INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY <ipe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bill Harker wrote:
>
> There is an interesting debate which has recently begun in Indonesia
> regarding the role of the military in the political and economic systems.
> As you know, the army, in 1965, overthrew President Sukarno (who had
> himself, with the support of the army and the Communist Party, supplanted
> the previous competitive party democratic regime) and installed General
> Suharto as President of the New Order.
>
> In place of a party system, Indonesia introduced a functional group
> representative, Golkar. Just as the Dutch had found, Indonesian leaders
> discovered that having one umbrella group as the representative of peasants,
> laborers, intellectuals, farmers, etc. was more efficient. Golkar is the
> dominant election force, winning upwards of 70 percent of the vote in
> elections, but, by law, two (and only two at any one time) parties are
> allowed to exist.
>
> Early last week, Army Chief of Staff Hartono said, in a speech, that ABRI
> (Indonesian armed forces) members are "cadres of Golkar." This unleashed a
> storm of criticism from politicians and intellectuals. In response to the
> criticism, Suwarno, the political affairs chief for ABRI, said the army must
> take sides to "guarantee stability." Then, a regional general, Feisel
> Tanjung, waded in by saying the military does not take sides and that ABRI
> is "for the people...," "from the people...," and "by the people...." He
> went on to say that ABRI's role is to "develop one big family."
>
> Needless to say, all of this has provoked an intense discussion, with many
> Indonesians saying, in effect, "whoever thought the army was politically
> neutral to begin with?"
>
> What makes this even more interesting is the development of two more stories
> over the same period. Suharto's youngest son, Humerto (who now calls
> himself "Tommy"}, recently signed a car deal with (I think) Hyundai to
> produce Indonesia's first automobile. It is an exclusive deal with no other
> Indonesian company allowed to participate or seek another foreign partner to
> create its own car. Tommy has also monopolized the Indonesian
> telecommunications industry. Some Indonesians claim that even if Suharto
> and/or the military were removed from power, Tommy (and Suharto) have
> created a situation where it would be impossible for a new government to
> eliminate the Suharto/Tommy dominance of telecommunications.
>
> Finally, Sritex is claimed by Indonesians to be the largest textile mill in
> Southeast Asia. It is currently engaged in a vicious strike by employees,
> which the government is attempting to suppresss. But the interesting fact,
> and reason for the intensity of the suppression, is that it is owned by
> Kopassus (a group of Army elite officers), Hamoko, Indonesian Information
> Minister and Tutut, Suharto's daughter.
>
> Although not related, these three events have dominated Indonesian news for
> the past couple of weeks and, I think, express some of the complexities of
> Indonesian life under military rule and the military's ability to infiltrate
> various parts of Indonesian life and economy. In some ways comparable, some
> ways not comparable to other Southeast and South Asian countries.
>
> William R. Harker
> e-mail: wharker@xxxxxxxxxxxx