[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
BurmaNet News: August 9, 1996
- Subject: BurmaNet News: August 9, 1996
- From: strider@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 02:07:00
------------------------ BurmaNet ------------------------
"Appropriate Information Technologies, Practical Strategies"
----------------------------------------------------------
The BurmaNet News: August 9, 1996
Issue #487
Noted in Passing:
============
We would certainly have preferred the tendency to be
the opposite. On the other hand there is no ban on
trading with Burma,said Norwegian Foreign Ministry
spokesman Ingvard Havnen.
HEADLINES:
==========
NCGUB: STATEMENT ON 8.8.88
AP: BURMESE DEMOCRACY LEADER URGES BOYCOTT
VOA: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT ON BURMA
AP DOW JONES: SINGAPORE SEES OPPORTUNITIES
AP: NORWAY'S IMPORTS FROM BURMA UP 45% SAYS REPORT
FEER: INVESTORS HAVE STATE, INFRASTRUCTURE WOES
NATION: THAILAND, BURMA INK PACT FOR COOPERATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NCGUB: STATEMENT ON 8.8.88
August 8, 1996
NATIONAL COALITION GOVERNMENT OF THE UNION OF BURMA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement on Eighth Anniversary of 8888 Pro-democracy Uprising
August 8, 1996
Today is the eighth anniversary of the august and prestigious day of
the 8888 Pro-democracy Uprising on which the entire people of Burma,
including Sanghas and students, demonstrated peacefully against the
Burma Socialist Programme Party (BSPP) military dictatorship which had
been brutally and inhumanely ruling the country for more than 26 years,
and demanded for democratic and human rights and abolition of the military
dictatorship. This was also the historic day on which the people thrust
their chests and sacrificed their lives, for the establishment of democracy in
Burma, in front of the gun barrels of the military dictatorship.
1. The SLORC military dictatorship which continues to rule Burma currently
still employs the brutal means of arms to settle the demands of the people
for democratic and human rights. For the perpetuation of military
dictatorship, it is still oppressively ruling against the will of the people
by resorting to various kinds of trick and shamelessly using lies and deceits.
It is a common knowledge to the world that the military dictatorship has
been perpetrating wide-spread violations of human rights by the use of
unjust laws, orders and powers, without any sense of justness.
2. Up until now, the SLORC military clique is still in default of honouring
the results of May 1990 elections and has been continuing, by force, its
sham National Convention which is absolutely against the will of the
people. Ruthlessly, the SLORC has been oppressing the National League
for Democracy (NLD), out of spite, for boycotting its sham National
Convention beginning from November 28, 1995. Moreover, it has been
arbitrarily arresting and torturing the NLD members of parliament-elect
and refusing to take the offer made by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the
NLD for political dialogue.
3. Though the SLORC has concluded cease-fire agreements with 14 armed
ethnic organizations and is attempting to reach similar agreements with
the rest, a case-fire, without a possibility to resolve the political problems
by political means, has no chance to lead to genuine and lasting peace in
the country. As it is done by the SLORC without the real intention of
gaining national reconciliation but just to drive a wedge between the
ethnic nationality and pro-democracy forces and to gain a temporary
respite from the political crises it is facing, genuine national reconciliation
is still out of sight.
4. The SLORC's evil system of arbitrary market economy is benefiting
only senior military officers, their relatives and a handful business people,
while the large majority of the people have to bear daily the affliction of
rising prices and raging inflation.
5. As the ASEAN countries' relation with Burma after giving it an
observer status, in accordance with the constructive engagement policy,
is like promoting the SLORC one-sidedly without benefiting the people
in any way, the SLORC has become more efficient in perpetrating
oppression and arbitrary acts. Moreover, it is now able more than ever to
defy the international pressure.
6. On behalf of the people of Burma, we would like to appeal to
governments, the NGOs and international community:-
- To condemn the constructive engagement policy of the ASEAN;
- To make effort for imposing economic sanctions on the SLORC
military junta;
- To abstain from making investment in Burma;
- To suspend financial assistance to the SLORC military junta;
- To boycott the visit Myanmar (Burma) Year.
7. For the achievement of democracy, we would like to urge the entire
people of Burma to make utmost effort for:-
- The realization of the results of May 1990 elections;
- Opposing the SLORC's National Convention;
- Supporting in all possible ways, the NLD led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi;
- Working together with us for the early emergence of a political dialogue
participated by the pro-democracy forces led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi,
the forces of ethnic nationalities and SLORC.
8. We, the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, would
like to affirm, on this occasion of the Eighth Anniversary of the 8888
Uprising, that we will eternally respect and honour the heroes of
democracy who had valiantly sacrificed their lives and the people who
had bravely participated in the pro-democracy uprising, and pledge that
we will struggle on, without rest, until democracy is achieved for Burma.
Council of Ministers
NCGUB
**********************************************************
AP: BURMESE DEMOCRACY LEADER URGES BOYCOTT
August 8, 1996
CANBERRA -- Burmese democracy leader Dr. Sein Win Thursday urged
businesses to withhold investment from his homeland until the military
junta restores civilian rule and ends human rights abuse, reports The
Associated Press.
Win joined about 200 protesters outside the Burmese Embassy on the
eighth anniversary of the democratic uprising against military rule in
Burma.
'We appeal to the international community not to invest in Burma at this
time,' said Win, who heads the National Coalition Government of the Union
of Burma, a government-in-exile based in Washington. 'Stop the
investment, it is time to stop the suffering in Burma.'
The coalition claims to be the legitimate government of Burma, where
power has been held by the State Law and Order Restoration Council since
it canceled the 1990 election of the National League for Democracy led by
Aung San Suu Kyi.
Win is Aung San Suu Kyi's cousin.
A report released by Amnesty International this week claimed the Burmese
military was responsible for widespread human rights violations against
the country's ethnic minorities, including summary executions, torture
and rape.
The spirit of the Aug. 8, 1988 uprising that was overthrown by generals
loyal to the government gave birth to the organized movement for
democracy, he said. Thousands of protesters were killed when the military
suppressed the uprising.
Win will meet Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Deputy Prime
Minister Tim Fischer later this month to discuss Australia's stance on
Burma's military regime.
'What we would like to see is that Australia leads in human rights and
democracy,' Win said.
**********************************************************
VOA: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT ON BURMA
August 8, 1996
Thursday marked the eighth anniversary of an uprising against military rule
in Burma. The issuance of a new report of human rights abuses in burma
coincides with Thursday's anniversary.
A new report by Amnesty International accuses Burma's ruling military
of widespread persecution of ethnic minorities.
In its report, the London-based human rights group says ethnic
minorities continue to be subjected to torture, rape, and summary
execution, despite government truces with ethnic guerrilla
groups. Amnesty international says thousands of people have been
driven from their homes and pressed into forced labor during the
burmese military's counterinsurgency operations in the eastern
shan and mon states and in the southern tenasserim division.
The report takes its accounts from interviews with Burmese
refugees who fled to Thailand. The 14-page report was issued in
conjunction with the eighth anniversary of the popular uprising
against military rule in Burma.
According to these accounts, forced labor is a common practice in
minority areas. The report says civilians, including young girls
have been forced to work as porters for the soldiers. It says
they were tortured and mistreated if they could not carry the
heavy loads of supplies and ammunition.
It also alleges there has been an increasing use of forced labor
on public works projects, such as rail lines.
Various ethnic groups have been fighting for autonomy
ever since Burma's independence in 1948. Ruling governments,
including the current military junta in Rangoon, have tried with
little success to bring the ethnic insurgences under control.
however, the current government says it has reached ceasefires
with most of the rebel groups.
There has been no direct comment from the Rangoon government on
the Amnesty International report. However, a commentary in
state-run newspapers Wednesday said there is no forced labor in
Burma, only what was described as "work contribution." The
commentary was issued in response to a US embassy economic
report in Rangoon, which also alleges a sharp rise in the use of
unpaid labor.
Accusations of human rights abuses in Burma continue to plague
the economic sector eight years after the 1988 uprising.
Democracy activists, including Aung San Suu Kyi, continue to urge
foreign businesses to resist inducements by the Rangoon
government to invest in Burma, and have called on tourists to
boycott the campaign to visit Burma.
*********************************************************
AP DOW JONES: SINGAPORE SEES OPPORTUNITIES
August 8, 1996
SINGAPORE -- Singapore trade officials reckon the divestment by
multinational corporations from Burma offers up a short-term
investment opportunity for Singapore companies.
'A lack of foreign competition (in Burma) is helping Singapore
companies,' said a senior trade officer at the Singapore Trade Development
Board (TDB), the government's trade promotion arm, in a recent telephone
interview with AP-Dow Jones.
'It gives a bigger chance to smaller players,' the officer said.
U.S. and European companies like Pepsico Inc. and Heineken NV have
already pulled out of Burma, which is threatened by an economic boycott
because of the military government's human rights record.
But in the long run investment and economic growth in Burma will take
off only if there is major investment from multinational corporations to
upgrade the country's infrastructure, the Singapore TDB says.
'The question of providing the supporting infrastructure remains,' the
trade officer said.
Singapore, the second biggest investors in Burma after the U.K., will have
sunk around U.S.$700 million into the country by the end of the year, the
officer said. Singapore has invested U.S.$604 million in Burma to date.
The Singapore government hopes to boost investment further and remains
committed to a policy of constructive economic and political engagement
with the Burmese government, in line with approach of fellow members of
the Association of South-East Asian Nations (Asean).
***********************************************************
AP: NORWAY'S IMPORTS FROM BURMA UP 45% SAYS REPORT
August 8, 1996
OSLO -- Norway's imports from Burma increased by 45% in the first half
of 1996, in spite of Norway's sharp criticism of Burma's military junta,
a newspaper report said Tuesday.
Norway's total imports from Burma amounted to 5.1 million kroner,
mostly timber, cork and furniture, and will reach 13 million kroner by
the end of the year, said the newspaper Aftenposten.
'We would certainly have preferred the tendency to be the opposite. On the
other hand there is no ban on trading with Burma,' Foreign Ministry
spokesman Ingvard Havnen was quoted as telling the paper.
The government has, however, urged Norwegian businesses to sever all
contacts with Burma.
Norway has for years supported the Burmese opposition politician Aung
San Suu Kyi, who in 1991 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize by the Nobel
Committee, which is appointed by the Norwegian parliament.
Official relations with the Burmese regime reached a state of nearly
freezing when a former Scandinavian honorary consul in Burma, James
Leander Nichols, died in prison in June. Nichols was a close friend of Suu
Kyi.
Norwegian officials and human-rights organizations contend he died as a
result of brutal treatment in prison.
***********************************************************
FEER: INVESTORS HAVE STATE, INFRASTRUCTURE WOES
August 8, 1996 (Far Eastern Ecconomic Review)
by Gordon Fairclough
KANBAUK, Burma -- French oil company Total SA's rain-soaked base
camp in southern Burma is ringed with guard posts and double
barbed-wire fences. In the center are two underground bunkers. 'In case of
rocket attack,' explains operations manager Jean-Claude Ragot. 'We lost
five people last year. We have to be careful.'
The workers were killed by guerrillas fighting Rangoon's military
government. Now, crews travel with army escorts as they lay the
groundwork for a 670-kilometer pipeline that will carry natural gas
from wells in the Andaman Sea to a power plant in Thailand.
The troops won't protect Total against attacks from another direction,
though: Europe and its human rights groups, who say pipeline revenues
will prop up Burma's repressive regime, reports the Far Eastern
Economic Review in its latest edition published Thursday.
The French oil company faces more than political risks as it builds
Burma's biggest foreign-investment project. Its odyssey also reveals the
myriad daily challenges that crop up as companies do business in one of
Asia's least developed countries. Total has had to build its own roads,
airfield and wharf. It has also had to bridge two large rivers in order to
bring in its heavy equipment and supplies.
Total, and other companies investing in Burma, are pioneers braving one
of the region's last commercial frontiers. Infrastructure is antiquated and
inadequate, and there's little hope that multilateral lenders will finance
improvements if Burma's politics don't change. The country's 45 million
people are among the world's poorest and least educated - only one in four
children completes primary school. National income is less than $300 per
person. And the government continues to dominate much of the economy -
despite assurances that it has abandoned socialism for the free market.
Investors plunge in anyway, although many find there's more pain than
gain. Among the intrepid are Western oil companies and mining firms,
staking their claims to the country's natural riches. Southeast Asian
businessmen have put their money into hotels, real estate and light
manufacturing. Japan's big trading companies have also set up shop,
gambling that Burma will become the next low-cost production base for
their country's labour-intensive industries.
What spurs them on? 'The country has potential,' says Satoru Takahashi,
chief representative in Rangoon of Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. 'They have
many natural resources and cheap labor.' Indeed, Burma used to be one of
Asia's wealthiest countries. The fertile Irawaddy Delta was the region's
rice bowl. The country also has gas, teak and minerals. But the generals
who rule Burma drove the economy into the ground during 26 years of
socialist isolation.
Now, they've reversed themselves and opened the doors to foreign
investors. 'We can't industrialize without the help of the developed
countries,' says Set Maung, an economic adviser to the government. 'We
need their technology. We need their capital. That is why we are trying to
attract as much foreign investment as possible.'
To that end, the State Law and Order Restoration Council (Slorc), as the
junta calls itself, promulgated a liberal foreign-investment law in 1989.
It has approved more than $4 billion in investment projects, much of it in
oil and gas. It has also allowed private commercial banks to set up shop,
and says the banks may form joint ventures with foreign partners. The
generals have also given more economic freedom to Burma's farmers and
small-time entrepreneurs.
The resulting uptick in economic activity has created thousands of new
jobs. High-rise buildings are springing up in downtown Rangoon, where
the streets are clogged with private cars and taxis. New shops, restaurants
and hotels abound. But there are nevertheless serious doubts about whether
Burma is on its way to becoming an Asian tiger.
The World Bank and Asian Development Bank say recent reforms don't go
far enough. And a U.S. Embassy report released in August says Burma's
economic growth 'may prove unsustainable in the medium and long terms'
unless investment in infrastructure and education rises.
The country's policies certainly don't seem to be putting it on a trajectory
toward improvement. The fiscal conservatism, high investment and small
state sectors that characterize Asia's success stories are nowhere to be
found. Private investment as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) has
been declining since 1990, and only a tiny number of state enterprises
have been privatized. Burma's government keeps spending far more than it
earns. The deficit in the year ending March 31, 1995, was more than 6%
of GDP.
The generals spent more than 45% of the 1995 budget on defense. And that
doesn't include purchases of foreign hardware, such as Chinese tanks and
artillery, which aren't accounted for in government statistics. Meanwhile,
the proportion of spending which goes to education, health and other social
services, at 22.8%, has been falling since 1991.
The government pays for its spending spree by printing money, running up
the arrears on its foreign debt, and borrowing from domestic banks. In
fact, Burmese banks lend more than 80% of their money to the government
and state enterprises. Private borrowers are crowded out.
'There's still a socialist mentality,' notes one Sino-Burmese businessman
who has returned to the country. He and his family fled in the 1960s after
the military government nationalized all they owned.
The state firms get better access to utilities and government permits. In
addition, state firms and government agencies dominate Burma's
international trade.
The state sector accounts for more than half of Burma's exports and more
than a third of its imports. The government already monopolizes trade in
rice, teak and many minerals. And these days, foreign exchange-hungry
state agencies are buying up Burma's beans and pulses - among the main
agricultural exports - to sell overseas. Private traders, whose work was
made legal in 1989, complain they're being forced out of business.
'Government ministries and departments have an easier time getting the
export licences,' says one elderly trader. 'They are the traders now.'
With little in the way of capital and few opportunities to take advantage of,
prospective Burmese businessmen don't have much of a chance to rise.
That's bad news for foreign investors who might have sought independent
partners. 'The private sector is very small. So most negotiating is done
with the government,' says Kosuke Ito, Rangoon general manager of
Japanese trading company Nissho Iwai. 'The government says it will
privatize, but is still seeking its own business, so there is a conflict.'
***********************************************************
NATION: THAILAND, BURMA LINK PACT FOR COOPERATION
August 8, 1996
RANGOON - The joint signing of a memorandum to the third
Thai-Burmese Joint Commission attests to the tireless effort that
resulted in mutually-acceptable solutions being reached on some
issues of common concern, Burmese Foreign Minister U. Ohn Gyaw
said yesterday.
However, he added, both sides should not be content with what has
been achieved but should give attention to further enhance the
two countries' potential.
He said he was confident that of ficials concerned will continue
their contacts and work together to explore new areas of
cooperation. He hoped that such cooperation will be a benefit to
the people as well as lead to greater regional cooperation.
Deputy Prime Minister Amnuay Viravan said that his meetings with
the Burmese leadership have confirmed the store of goodwill and
friendship that will pave the way for expansion of neighbourly
cooperation between the two countries.
Amnuay, also foreign minister, hoped that the issues both had
agreed to continue pursuing will be implemented and that the new
areas of cooperation, identified during the meeting, will be
pursued for the benefit of both sides. Amnuay and U Ohn Gyaw
concluded their three-day meeting by signing the memorandum,
which covered cooperation in culture, tourism and tourism
promotion in border areas.
Also covered is technical and economic cooperation that includes
training courses for future members of the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations that will be organised by the Thai
Foreign Ministry in September, and finance, transport and
communication linkages between the two coumtries. The memorandum
also includes the issue of border checkpoints. The second meeting
of the Thai-Burmese Joint Working Group on Border Checkpoints
held in Rangoon from July 31 to Aug 1 concluded with an agreement
that key border checkpoints would soon be upgraded to
international crossing points once the Agreement on Border
Crossings between the two countries becomes effective.
Other issues of cooperation includes investment, forestry,
energy, narcotics, aviation, banking and others.
On the issue of fisheries, the Thais proposed that Burmese
officials participate in the Thai-Burma Coordination Office in
Ranong province, which was recently established umder the
supervision of the Supreme Command to solve problems related to
illegal fishing in Burmese waters.
Thailand also asked Burma not to use force against Thai fishermen
illegally fishing in Burmese waters and to promptly inform Thai
officials of any arrests. However, Burma will maintain the use of
force but only under stringent rules and procedures and only when
there is no other alternative.
The meeting also made significant progress on many issues, such
as the restoration of the Moei-Thaungyin river bank, on which
they expect to reach a solution through a flexible rpproach.
Amnuay had earlier said that he asked Burmese officials to be
flexible in their approach to solving various issues.
Burma has been concerned that extending the river bank by Thais
would affect the flow of the river and cause increased erosion on
the Burmese side.
Amnuay said that both sides could engage in work on their river
banks to prevent soil erosion but should inform one another
before starting any work.
Both also agreed to open the border checkpoint at Mae
Sot-Myawaddy on a permanent basis for trade and tourism.
Thailand hoped that the Tachileik Kyaington Road improvement
project, for which the government has offered a soft loan of
Bt300 million, will be implemented soon.
During a bilateral meeting betweenAmnuay and Burmese leader Gen
Than Shwe, the prime minister and president of the ruling junta,
known as the State Law and Order Restoration Couneil, the general
encouraged Thailand to develop the Dawei deep sea port. According
to an official, the Italthai Company recently signed a memorandum
of understanding to conduct a feasibility study, which is
expected to be completed in six months.
On border issues, a working group comprised of officials from
both countries will meet to address the problem of undefined
borders in order to prevent future conflicts. Both share a common
border of 2,400 kilometres.
********************************************************
----------------------------------------------------------
BURMANET SUBJECT-MATTER RESOURCE LIST
BurmaNet regularly receives enquiries on a number of different
topics related to Burma. If you have questions on any of the
following subjects, please direct email to the following volunteer
coordinators, who will either answer your question or try to put you
in contact with someone who can:
Campus activism: zni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boycott campaigns: [Pepsi] ai268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Buddhism: Buddhist Relief Mission: brelief@xxxxxxx
Chin history/culture: [volunteer temporarily away]
Fonts: tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
High School Activism: nculwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
History of Burma: zni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
International Affairs: Julien Moe: JulienMoe@xxxxxxx
Kachin history/culture: 74750.1267@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Karen history/culture: Karen Historical Society: 102113.2571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mon history/culture: [volunteer needed]
Naga history/culture: Wungram Shishak: z954001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Burma-India border [volunteer needed]
Pali literature: "Palmleaf": c/o burmanet@xxxxxxxxxxx
Resettlement info: refugee_help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rohingya culture volunteer needed
Shan history/culture: Sao Hpa Han: burma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shareholder activism: simon_billenness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Total/Pipeline Dawn Star: cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tourism campaigns: bagp@xxxxxxxxxx "Attn. S.Sutcliffe"
volunteering: refugee_help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
World Wide Web: FreeBurma@xxxxxxxxx
[Feel free to suggest more areas of coverage]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BurmaNet News is an electronic newspaper covering Burma.
Articles from newspapers, magazines, newsletters, the wire
services and the Internet as well as original material are published.
It is produced with the support of the Burma Information Group
(B.I.G) and the Research Department of the ABSDF {MTZ}
The BurmaNet News is e-mailed directly to subscribers and is
also distributed via the soc.culture.burma and seasia-l
mailing lists. For a free subscription to the BurmaNet News, send
an e-mail message to: majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx
For the BurmaNet News only: in the body of the message, type
"subscribe burmanews-l" (without quotation marks).
For the BurmaNet News and 4-5 other messages a day posted on Burma
issues, type "subscribe burmanet-l"
Letters to the editor, comments or contributions of articles should be
sent to the editor at: strider@xxxxxxxxxxx
*****************************************************************