[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Comments: Question to Freedom Fight (r)
- Subject: Comments: Question to Freedom Fight (r)
- From: BURMAJAPAN@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 21:07:00
Subject: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
Only the Press and the President changed their name from Rebels to
Terrorists. What terror did they spread ??
In a message dated 97-05-01 17:38:49 EDT, you write:
>Subj: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
>Date: 97-05-01 17:38:49 EDT
>From: Winston_Lee@xxxxxxx
>Reply-to: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Conference reg.burma)
>To: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Recipients of burmanet-l)
>
>Subject: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
>
>There is a clear cut between people who are "armed" & those who are not.
>
>Now, unless the author was trying to parallel those <outside Burma fighting
>peacefully in non-violent way for a good cause> to armed Shinning Path or
>bloody Sinn Fein from Northern Eire ...
>
>I absolutely agree with Lisa. There aint no comparison whatsoever.
>Extremist is extremist whether supported by common people or those who are
>privileged. Likewise, terrorism shouldnt be encouraged in a good cause at
>any time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>Subj: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
>>Date: 97-04-28 23:43:49 EDT
>>From: lb252689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Reply-to: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Conference reg.burma)
>>To: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Recipients of burmanet-l)
>>
>>From: Lisa Booth Brooten <lb252689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: RE: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru (fwd)
>>
>>It is dangerous to equate the situation in Burma with the TUPAC-AMARU,
>>which is not, as I understand it, supported by a majority of the Peruvian
>>people, and for however noble their reasons, was acting with violence
>>against innocent people to make their point. Also -- wasn't Fujimori
>>elected?