[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

CRACKDOWN IN BURMA:VOA TALK SHOW



DATE=MAY 31, 1997

TYPE=ON THE LINE

NUMBER=1-00535

TITLE=CRACKDOWN IN BURMA

EDITOR=OFFICE OF POLICY - 619-0037



CONTENT=

THEME:           UP, HOLD UNDER AND FADE

ANNCR:           ON THE LINE -- A DISCUSSION OF UNITED STATES 
                 POLICIES AND CONTEMPORARY ISSUES.  THIS WEEK, 
                 "CRACKDOWN IN BURMA."  HERE IS YOUR HOST, ROBERT
                 REILLY.

HOST:            HELLO AND WELCOME TO ON THE LINE.  

                 IN 1990, THE PEOPLE OF BURMA VOTED 
                 OVERWHELMINGLY FOR A DEMOCRATIC CIVILIAN 
                 GOVERNMENT AND AN END TO MILITARY RULE.  THE 
                 MILITARY REGIME, CALLED THE STATE LAW AND ORDER 
                 RESTORATION COUNCIL, OR SLORC, ANNULLED THE 
                 ELECTION.  SINCE THEN, SLORC HAS ENGAGED IN 
                 SYSTEMATIC HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.  OVER THE PAST 
                 YEAR, ACCORDING TO THE MOST RECENT STATE 
                 DEPARTMENT HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT, BURMA'S 
                 "CITIZENS CONTINUED TO LIVE SUBJECT AT ANY TIME 
                 AND WITHOUT APPEAL TO THE ARBITRARY AND BRUTAL 
                 DICTATES OF THE MILITARY DICTATORSHIP." MOST 
                 RECENTLY, SLORC CRACKED DOWN ON SUPPORTERS OF 
                 NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY LEADER AUNG SAN 
                 SUU KYI TO PREVENT A MAY CEREMONY MARKING THE 
                 ANNIVERSARY OF THE 1990 ELECTIONS.  BECAUSE OF 
                 THE CONTINUING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, PRESIDENT 
                 BILL CLINTON HAS IMPOSED ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ON 
                 BURMA. 

                 JOINING ME TODAY TO DISCUSS BURMA AND U.S. 
                 POLICY ARE TWO EXPERTS.  GARE SMITH IS DEPUTY 
                 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEMOCRACY, 
                 HUMAN RIGHTS AND LABOR.  AND JONATHAN WINER IS 
                 DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR 
                 INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT 
                 AFFAIRS.  WELCOME TO THE PROGRAM.

                 GARE SMITH, A YEAR AGO, DURING THE ANNIVERSARY 
                 OF THE 1990 ELECTIONS, THE SLORC REGIME CRACKED 
                 DOWN ON THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY.  WHAT
                 HAS HAPPENED DURING THIS PAST WEEK IN BURMA?

SMITH:           WELL, UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE SEEING A REAL REPEAT 
                 OF THAT EXPERIENCE, BOB.  ON MAY 27TH AND 28TH, 
                 HUNDREDS, PERHAPS THOUSANDS OF SUPPORTERS OF 
                 AUNG SAN SUU KYI AND HER NATIONAL PARTY FOR 
                 DEMOCRACY SOUGHT TO COME TO HAVE THE SEVENTH 
                 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THEIR VICTORY AND THEIR 
                 WINNING SEATS IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY.  THE 
                 SLORC TOOK GREAT PAINS TO PROHIBIT THAT.  THEY 
                 PUT ROADBLOCKS UP ALL AROUND RANGOON, FENCED OFF
                 AUNG SAN SUU KYI'S HOME SO THE PEOPLE COULDN'T 
                 GET TO IT, AND ARRESTED, BY MY LAST COUNT, THREE
                 HUNDRED-SIXTEEN MEMBERS OF HER PARTY WHO HAVE 
                 NOW BEEN JAILED OR PUT IN WHAT THEY CALL "SAFE 
                 HOUSES" SO THEY ARE UNABLE TO TRAVEL AND UNABLE 
                 TO MEET WITH HER.

HOST:            THE SLORC REGIME FOR SOME TIME AT LEAST OFFERED 
                 AS A FAINT POSSIBILITY THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 
                 DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER, A 
                 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION AND SO FORTH.  HAS 
                 THEIR PAST BEHAVIOR OVER THIS YEAR DISSIPATED 
                 ANY HOPE FOR IMPROVEMENT ON THEIR PART?

SMITH:           WELL, I'D START BY SAYING THAT THIS IDEA OF A 
                 CONSTITUTION IS A TOTAL SHAM.  THEY HAVE A 
                 DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED LEGISLATURE AND THOSE ARE
                 AUNG SAN SUU KYI'S PEOPLE.  IN THE 1990 
                 ELECTIONS, THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY WON
                 392 SEATS OUT OF A POSSIBLE 485.  THAT IS AN 
                 OVERWHELMING VICTORY ANY WAY YOU COUNT IT.  
                 THOSE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DULY AND 
                 DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED IN FREE AND FAIR 
                 ELECTIONS.  THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO TAKE THEIR
                 SEATS.  IF THEY WANT TO FORM A CONSTITUTION OR 
                 REWRITE IT, THAT'S FINE.  THEY'RE THE 
                 DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES.  BUT FOR
                 HAND-PICKED MEMBERS OF SLORC TO WRITE A 
                 CONSTITUTION IS A FARCE.  WE SHOULDN'T ACCEPT IT
                 AND NOR WILL THE PEOPLE OF BURMA.

HOST:            JONATHAN WINER, IN YOUR AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, 
                 WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT BURMA?

WINER:           WHAT GARE HAD TO SAY IS VERY IMPORTANT IN 
                 FIGHTING NARCOTICS AND CRIME AS WELL, BECAUSE 
                 ONE OF THE REASONS THAT BURMA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
                 TWO-THIRDS OF THE WORLD'S OPIUM CROP -- AND IN 
                 FACT WOULD SUPPLY THE ENTIRE HEROIN DEMAND OF 
                 THE WORLD ON ITS OWN IF NOBODY ELSE IN THE WORLD
                 PRODUCED HEROIN -- IS BECAUSE ITS GOVERNMENT, 
                 LACKING POPULAR LEGITIMACY, BASICALLY BUYS 
                 SUPPORT AS IT CAN FROM THE TRAFFICKERS.  AND SO 
                 WHILE SLORC ITSELF IS NOT PARTICULARLY INVOLVED 
                 IN THE MECHANICS OF DRUG TRAFFICKING, THE DRUG 
                 TRADE IN BURMA IS AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF HOW 
                 THAT GOVERNMENT MAINTAINS POWER.  SO, IT'S 
                 INTIMATELY CONNECTED -- THIS LACK OF DEMOCRACY 
                 AND THE FACT THAT THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE, IN LARGE
                 PART, FOR THE WORLD'S HEROIN PROBLEM.

HOST:            THE POLICY OF ENGAGEMENT, WHICH HAS PEOPLE IN 
                 SOUTHEAST ASIA, IN ASEAN, PROMOTING CHANGE 
                 WITHIN BURMA BY ENGAGING THE GOVERNMENT.  
                 CRITICS OF THIS ADMINISTRATION HAVE SAID THAT 
                 PRESIDENT CLINTON OUGHT TO BE ENGAGING BURMA 
                 INSTEAD OF IMPOSING SANCTIONS.  WHAT HAS BEEN 
                 THE RESULT OF A POLICY OF ENGAGEMENT, WHETHER IT
                 BE ON THE PART OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER 
                 COUNTRIES IN IMPROVING HUMAN RIGHTS OR INDEED OF
                 ADDRESSING THIS TREMENDOUS DRUG PROBLEM?

WINER:           LET'S TALK ABOUT ENGAGEMENT WITH BURMA FOR A 
                 MOMENT.  THE U-N-D-C-P, WHICH IS THE U-N DRUG 
                 CONTROL PROGRAM, A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WITH 
                 SUPPORT MOSTLY FROM EUROPEAN FUNDERS, WENT IN 
                 AND TRIED TO DO A TEST PROJECT IN BURMA ON DRUG 
                 ERADICATION.  THE PROJECT'S STILL STALLED.  THE 
                 SLORC WAS NEVER ABLE TO SAY YES.  THERE'D BE ONE
                 OBJECTION, THERE'D BE ANOTHER OBJECTION.  YOU 
                 KNOW, THERE WAS ABOUT FIVE HUNDRED KILOS OF 
                 OPIUM SEIZED IN ALL OF BURMA, BY ALL BURMESE LAW
                 ENFORCEMENT, LAST YEAR.  THAT IS LESS THAN ONE 
                 HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL.  IN ANY 
                 REASONABLE COUNTRY, THE SEIZURE SHOULD BE TEN 
                 PERCENT, TWENTY PERCENT -- MINIMAL LAW 
                 ENFORCEMENT, FIVE OR TEN PERCENT.  THEY SEIZED 
                 LESS THAN ONE HALF OF ONE PERCENT.  THIS IS A 
                 COUNTRY WHICH, NO MATTER HOW ONE ENGAGES WITH 
                 THEM, THE GOVERNANCE HAS BEEN DEPENDENT ON A 
                 KIND OF STATE-SPONSORED CRIMINALITY, A KIND OF 
                 STATE-SPONSORED TERRORISM.  

HOST:            WHAT WOULD YOUR REACTION BE TO THEIR POTENTIAL 
                 EXCUSE THAT THEY DON'T CONTROL THE PART OF THE 
                 COUNTRY IN WHICH THE HEROIN IS PRODUCED?

WINER:           THE WAY IN WHICH THEY MAINTAIN CONTROL OVER ANY 
                 PART OF THE COUNTRY IS BY STRIKING DEALS WITH 
                 PEOPLE WHO CONTROL THAT PART OF THE TERRITORY. 
                 AND CONTROL IS MAINTAINED, IN PART, BY WHO CAN 
                 CONTROL THE REVENUE STREAMS FROM THE DOPE TRADE,
                 FROM THE PRODUCTION OF OPIUM.  SO THAT IS A 
                 TECHNIQUE, A TOOL THEY HAVE HAD TO USE TO 
                 MAINTAIN CONTROL BECAUSE THEY LACK THE POPULAR 
                 LEGITIMACY OF AN ELECTED GOVERNMENT.  SO, IT 
                 GOES TO THE CORE OF WHAT THEY'RE ABOUT.  IT'S 
                 NOT JUST A SIDELINE.

HOST:            GARE SMITH, IN TERMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES AND 
                 OTHER POLITICAL ISSUES, CAN YOU ADDRESS THIS 
                 QUESTION OF SO-CALLED ENGAGEMENT?

SMITH:           ABSOLUTELY.  I THINK JONATHAN HIT THE NAIL ON 
                 THE HEAD.  NEITHER THIS ADMINISTRATION NOR ANY 
                 OTHER ADMINISTRATION I CAN THINK OF IN THE 
                 UNITED STATES LIKES SANCTIONS.  WHEN YOU SEE 
                 SANCTIONS BEING IMPOSED, IT'S A LAST-DITCH 
                 EFFORT.  IT MEANS THAT, BASICALLY, BILATERAL 
                 DISCUSSIONS HAVE FAILED, MULTILATERAL ATTEMPTS 
                 HAVE NOT GOTTEN US TO THE POINT THAT WE WANT, 
                 AND THAT WE ARE REALLY LIMITED IN THE STEPS THAT
                 WE CAN TAKE.

HOST:            WELL, DID ANYTHING SPECIFIC TRIGGER THESE 
                 SANCTIONS?

SMITH:           WELL, THIS ADMINISTRATION AND SEVERAL 
                 ADMINISTRATIONS BEFORE IT HAVE DONE ALL THAT 
                 THEY POSSIBLY CAN DO TO WORK WITH THE SLORC.  
                 AND LET ME JUST PIGEONHOLE THREE SEPARATE 
                 CATEGORIES.  WE HAVE BILATERAL DIPLOMACY.  WE 
                 HAVE STRONGLY AND AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS, URGED 
                 THE SLORC TO RESPECT THE DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS, 
                 TO LET AUNG SAN SUU KYI AND THE NATIONAL LEAGUE 
                 FOR DEMOCRACY INTO POWER, TO RELEASE POLITICAL 
                 DISSIDENTS, TO STOP THEIR GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS 
                 VIOLATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATION OF WORKER RIGHTS,
                 THEIR SLAVE LABOR -- THERE'S CHILD LABOR IN 
                 BURMA -- TO NO AVAIL.  WE HAVE WORKED 
                 MULTILATERALLY WITH OUR ALLIES.  BEFORE THE 
                 UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY THERE HAVE BEEN 
                 RESOLUTIONS CONDEMNING BURMA.  BEFORE THE 
                 INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION, BEFORE THE 
                 UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.  ALL OF 
                 EUROPE, ALL OF THE WEST AND MUCH OF THE EAST -- 
                 BECAUSE THIS IS NOT AN EAST-WEST MATTER -- HAVE 
                 CONDEMNED THE BURMESE JUNTA.

HOST:            BUT HAS ANY OTHER COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION JOINED
                 THE UNITED STATES IN IMPOSING ANY KIND OF TRADE 
                 SANCTIONS?

WINER:           WELL, EVEN THE EUROPEAN UNION, WHICH ORDINARILY 
                 DOES NOT LIKE THE SANCTIONS ROUTE.  YOU'VE GOT 
                 FIFTEEN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, ALL OF WHOM HAVE 
                 THEIR NATIONAL AGENDAS [THAT HAVE] SAID BURMA IS
                 NOT ACCEPTABLE, THE BURMESE GOVERNMENT IS NOT 
                 ACCEPTABLE AND HAS IMPOSED SOME SANCTIONS, WHICH
                 IS VERY, VERY UNUSUAL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION.  
                 IT'S VERY REMARKABLE.  IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE 
                 PROBLEMS THAT DEMOCRACIES HAVE, HUMAN RIGHTS AND
                 RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL MAKE IT MORE 
                 DIFFICULT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS 
                 SOMETIMES TO MAKE ARRESTS.  WHY CAN'T YOU GO 
                 AFTER THAT GUY?  YOU KNOW HE'S GUILTY.  WELL, I 
                 HAVE TO HAVE THE EVIDENCE.  I HAVE TO HAVE THE 
                 WITNESSES.  I HAVE TO BE ABLE TO PROVE IT IN A 
                 TRIAL.  WELL, THE SLORC DOESN'T HAVE THAT 
                 PROBLEM.  THEY DON'T NEED WITNESSES.  THEY DON'T
                 NEED EVIDENCE.  IT'S AN AUTHORITARIAN REGIME.  
                 THEY CAN BASICALLY ARREST WHOEVER THEY WANT TO 
                 AS THEY DID WITH THESE MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRACY 
                 MOVEMENT OVER THE PAST NUMBER OF DAYS.  THE FACT
                 THAT THEY INTERDICT ALMOST NO HEROIN, THAT THEY 
                 ERADICATE ESSENTIALLY NO OPIUM, DEMONSTRATES 
                 THAT THIS REGIME DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THESE 
                 ISSUES.  IN FACT, IT IS ESSENTIAL TO THEM TO 
                 KEEP THESE THINGS GOING AS PART OF THEIR POWER 
                 BASE, WHICH IS WHY THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, LIKE 
                 THE UNITED STATES, LIKE SO MANY COUNTRIES, LOOKS
                 ON THE SLORC AS AN UTTERLY ILLEGITIMATE REGIME 
                 AND BURMA AS HAVING BECOME, UNFORTUNATELY, 
                 DESPITE ITS WONDERFUL PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING SO 
                 DAMAGED AND DESTROYED BY THIS, A PARIAH STATE.  
                 AND THAT, IN TURN, CREATES ECONOMIC SUFFERING 
                 FOR THE BURMESE PEOPLE.  THERE IS NO WAY OUT 
                 OTHER THAN THE WAY OUT OF DEMOCRACY.  

HOST:            WHY DO NOT THE COUNTRIES OF ASIA, SOUTHEAST ASIA
                 -- SPECIFICALLY THE MEMBERS OF ASEAN -- AGREE 
                 WITH YOU IN THIS RESPECT?  AS YOU KNOW, ASEAN IS
                 NOW CONSIDERING MEMBERSHIP FOR BURMA IN THAT 
                 ORGANIZATION.

SMITH:           WELL, THAT'S RIGHT.  AND WE HOPE THAT THEY WILL 
                 TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC 
                 TRAGIC EVENTS THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE DURING THE 
                 LAST WEEK IN THEIR CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER TO 
                 ADMIT BURMA.  WE HOPE THAT WILL BE A FACTOR AND 
                 THAT WILL INFLUENCE THEIR DECISION MAKING.  
                 WHETHER IT DOES OR NOT, THEY WILL HAVE TO DEAL 
                 WITH BURMA.  BURMA IS IN THEIR HEMISPHERE.  
                 WHETHER BURMA IS A MEMBER OF ASEAN OR WHETHER 
                 BURMA IS NOT A MEMBER, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO 
                 DEAL WITH THAT MILITARY JUNTA.  THEY'RE GOING TO
                 FIND OUT THAT A MILITARY JUNTA THAT UNDERMINES 
                 THE RIGHTS OF ITS OWN PEOPLE IS ALL THE MORE 
                 LIKELY TO UNDERMINE THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF
                 OTHER NATIONS AROUND AND THE PEOPLES OF OTHER 
                 NATIONS.  SO THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADDRESS 
                 THE ISSUE INCREASINGLY AS WE HAVE.  

HOST:            WELL, IT'S INTERESTING THAT AUNG SAN SUU KYI HAD
                 A VIDEO SENT OUT OF THE COUNTRY TO THE ASEAN 
                 MEETING IN WHICH SHE IS MAKING AN APPEAL TO THEM
                 APPARENTLY NOT TO ADMIT BURMA SO LONG AS IT 
                 SUPPRESSES THE PEOPLE.  AND ALSO I BELIEVE SHE 
                 HAS TAKEN A STAND ON ECONOMIC TRADE SANCTIONS, 
                 SAYING THEY SHOULD BE PLACED ON BURMA AND THAT 
                 WESTERN CORPORATIONS SHOULD NOT INVEST IN THERE 
                 BECAUSE IT'S ONLY ENRICHING THE REPRESSIVE 
                 ELITE.  THAT'S SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL BECAUSE IN MOST 
                 CASES YOU HEAR THE CASE BEING MADE THAT BUSINESS
                 PROGRESS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COUNTRY WILL 
                 SOMEHOW LEAD TO LIBERALIZATION.

WINER:           LOOK AT SOUTH AFRICA AND NELSON MANDELA.  NELSON
                 MANDELA WAS IN PRISON FOR DECADES.  AND 
                 ULTIMATELY, AS A RESULT OF THE MORAL POWER HE 
                 HAD AS A LEADER, AS A TRUE LEADER OF HIS PEOPLE,
                 AND NOW AS A DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED LEADER OF 
                 HIS PEOPLE, TOGETHER WITH MULTILATERAL 
                 SANCTIONS, WITH THE WHOLE WORLD RECOGNIZING THAT
                 APARTHEID WAS UNACCEPTABLE, YOU HAD A 
                 FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH AFRICA FROM 
                 A NON-DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY TO A MULTICULTURAL, 
                 MULTIRACIAL OPEN SOCIETY.  THAT IS THE 
                 TRANSITION THAT THE BURMESE PEOPLE DEMONSTRATED 
                 THEY WANTED SIX YEARS AGO AND THAT THE SLORC 
                 FRUSTRATES TO THIS DAY.  AND, I THINK IT'S THE 
                 PERSPECTIVE OF OUR PRESIDENT AND OUR SECRETARY 
                 OF STATE AND OUR GOVERNMENT THAT EVERY 
                 GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD HAS AN ETHICAL AND MORAL
                 OBLIGATION TO THE PEOPLE OF BURMA, FOR STARTERS,
                 TO HELP THEM WIN THEIR FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY.

HOST:            AS A MATTER OF FACT, I BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT WAS
                 ACTING ON AUTHORITY GIVEN HIM BY THE U.S. 
                 CONGRESS AND IMPOSING THESE SANCTIONS BECAUSE 
                 SLORC REFUSES TO DEAL WITH THE BURMESE PEOPLE.  
                 CAN YOU BE SPECIFIC, GARE SMITH, AND TELL US 
                 WHAT SLORC NEEDS TO DO TO HAVE THESE SANCTIONS 
                 REMOVED?

SMITH:           WELL, IT'S QUITE EASY, AND WE'VE MADE IT 
                 PERFECTLY CLEAR TO SLORC BEFORE THE SANCTIONS 
                 WERE EVEN ON THE PLATTER -- THE COHEN-FEINSTEIN 
                 AMENDMENT,  THE EXECUTIVE ORDER WAS SIGNED BY 
                 THE PRESIDENT ON MAY 20TH -- AND THAT IS, THEY 
                 HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT IN 
                 BURMA AND THEY BOW TO THE DEMANDS OF THE BURMESE
                 PEOPLE SO THAT THEY COULD HAVE THEIR OWN VOICE 
                 IN THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT, AS THEY ARE ENTITLED 
                 TO.

HOST:            IN OTHER WORDS, RECOGNIZE THE LEGITIMACY OF THE 
                 1990 ELECTION.

SMITH:           PRECISELY.  THAT WOULD CERTAINLY BE THE LARGEST 
                 STEP THAT THEY COULD TAKE.  THERE ARE CERTAINLY,
                 UNFORTUNATELY, A PLETHORA OF OTHER PROBLEMS THAT
                 WE ENCOUNTER -- CONTINUING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, 
                 DISSIDENTS ARE PICKED UP, LOCKED UP IN JAIL, 
                 DISAPPEAR, SOMETIMES KILLED.  THERE'S FORCED 
                 LABOR, PEOPLE ARE TAKEN UP OUT OF THEIR VILLAGES
                 AND MADE TO BUILD ROADS FOR THE SLORC TO EXPAND 
                 THEIR BASE AND THERE ARE ANY NUMBER OF PROBLEMS 
                 THAT WE WOULD ALSO HOPE COULD BE AMELIORATED.

HOST:            IN FACT, YOU ADDRESSED A NUMBER OF THESE 
                 PROBLEMS AT THE RECENT U-N HUMAN RIGHTS 
                 COMMISSION MEETING IN GENEVA, WHERE THERE WAS 
                 PASSAGE OF SOME STATEMENT ON BURMA, WAS THERE 
                 NOT?

SMITH:           THAT'S RIGHT.  WE HAD A VERY STRONG RESOLUTION 
                 THAT THE U-N HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION PASSED ON 
                 BURMA DEALING WITH THEIR FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE 
                 THE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE 
                 GOVERNMENT, LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT, FAILURE TO 
                 HONOR FUNDAMENTAL WORKER RIGHTS, FUNDAMENTAL 
                 RIGHTS.  AND I UNDERLINE THAT WORD, BECAUSE 
                 OFTENTIMES THESE KINDS OF DISCUSSIONS GET CAUGHT
                 UP IN AN EAST-WEST, NORTH-SOUTH DEBATE -- OH, 
                 THOSE ARE U.S. VALUES, THOSE ARE WESTERN VALUES 
                 BEING IMPOSED ON ASIA, WHICH HAS DIFFERENT 
                 VALUES, AND YOU SHOULD RESPECT OUR DIFFERENT 
                 VALUES.  THAT'S A REAL RED HERRING AND THAT'S 
                 SOMETHING THAT YOU NEED ONLY TO LOOK AT THE U-N 
                 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, WHICH HAS CHINA, HAS 
                 MALAYSIA, HAS DIFFERENT MEMBERS OF THE ASIAN 
                 COMMUNITY THERE.  THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF 
                 HUMAN RIGHTS WAS DRAFTED BY THREE INDIVIDUALS.  
                 ONE WAS ELEANOR ROOSEVLET, ANOTHER WAS A 
                 FRENCHMAN, ANOTHER WAS A CHINAMAN.  AND THOSE 
                 UNIVERSAL NORMS REFLECT ASIAN VALUES JUST AS 
                 MUCH, [JUST] AS STRONGLY AS THEY REFLECT WESTERN
                 VALUES.

HOST:            INDEED, DID SOME OF THESE ASIAN NATIONS VOTE FOR
                 THIS RESOLUTION AGAINST BURMA?

SMITH:           ABSOLUTELY.  THIS WAS NOT A CLOSE VOTE.

WINER:           THE UNITED STATES IS NOT THE ONE WHO ELECTED 
                 AUNG SAN SUU KYI TO RULE HER COUNTRY.  IT WAS 
                 THE BURMESE PEOPLE.  THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO 
                 BELIEVED THEY WANTED A DIFFERENT REGIME, A 
                 DIFFERENT RULE WHEN THEY WERE GIVEN THE CHANCE.

HOST:            ONE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE THAT SOMETIMES DOES NOT 
                 RECEIVE AS MUCH PROMINENCE AS THE SLAVE LABOR 
                 AND THE CHILD LABOR AND SUPPRESSION OF POLITICAL
                 RIGHTS, IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE ETHNIC 
                 MINORITIES IN BURMA?

SMITH:           THAT'S A VERY GOOD QUESTION.  THERE ARE A NUMBER
                 OF DIFFERENT ETHNIC MINORITIES.  THE ONE THAT 
                 MOST RECENTLY HAS SUFFERED IS THE KAREN, MANY OF
                 WHICH HAVE GONE ACROSS THE BORDER IN BURMA TO 
                 FLEE REPRESSION AND HAVE REFUGEE CAMPS ON 
                 THAILAND JUST OVER THE RIVER.  IN JANUARY, THERE
                 WERE RAIDS.  THE BURMESE WENT OVER THE BORDER 
                 AND BURNED A NUMBER OF THOSE CAMPS TO THE GROUND
                 AND MUCH MORE RECENTLY THIS MONTH A NUMBER OF 
                 PEOPLE HAVE DISAPPEARED.  THERE HAS BEEN SOME 
                 FORCED REPATRIATION.  THE FIGURES RANGE FROM A 
                 LOW OF FOUR-HUNDRED TO A HIGH OF TWO-THOUSAND 
                 PEOPLE BEING FORCED BACK FROM THEIR REFUGEE 
                 CAMPS IN THAILAND INTO THE REPRESSIVE HANDS OF 
                 THE SLORC AGAINST THEIR WILL.  THAT'S A TRAGEDY.
                 THERE'S NO OTHER WORD FOR IT.  IT'S A GREAT 
                 TRAGEDY AND ITS A VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS AND 
                 OUR CHARGE IN BURMA HAS MADE STRONG 
                 DENUNCIATIONS OF THAT AND WE'RE SPEAKING WITH 
                 THE THAI OFFICIALS ALSO.

WINER:           IT'S A VERY INTERESTING POLITICAL PHENOMENOM.  
                 ANY TIME YOU SEE REFUGEE FLOWS, IT'S A SIGN OF 
                 FAILED GOVERNMENT.  YOU DON'T HAVE REFUGEES 
                 WHERE GOVERNMENTS ARE FUNCTIONING, WHERE 
                 GOVERNMENTS ARE TAKING CARE OF THEIR PEOPLE.  
                 YOU ONLY HAVE IT WHEN A GOVERNMENT IF 
                 FUNDAMENTALLY FAILED.  THIS GOVERNMENT, THE 
                 SLORC, HAS FUNDAMENTALLY FAILED.  IT IS GOING TO
                 WIND UP IN THE DUSTBIN OF HISTORY  LIKE EVERY 
                 OTHER TOTALITARIAN REGIME THAT DOES NOT 
                 REPRESENT ITS PEOPLE.  AND THE WORLD COMMUNITY 
                 HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO PUSH THEM INTO THAT 
                 DUSTBIN SOONER RATHER THAN LATER BY MAKING IT 
                 IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO SUSTAIN THE ILLICIT 
                 CONTROL THEY HAVE OF THEIR COUNTRY.

HOST:            ONE ANALYST HAS SAID THAT THE UNITED STATES MAY 
                 BE MISGUIDED IN A JUST COLD STRATEGIC VIEW OF 
                 THINGS BY TRYING TO ISOLATE BURMA BECAUSE THIS 
                 WILL SIMPLY DRIVE BURMA FURTHER INTO THE ARMS OF
                 CHINA, CHINA SEEKING PORTS IN THE INDIAN OCEAN 
                 AND SEEKING ACCESS TO THE INDIAN OCEAN FROM 
                 BURMESE PORTS.  WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THAT KIND OF
                 ASSESSMENT?

SMITH:           CHINA IS GOING TO ACT IN CHINA'S BEST INTEREST 
                 AS IT ALWAYS HAS, AND [IT] WANTS THOSE PORTS.  
                 AND CHINA HAS WORKED WITH SLORC QUITE CLOSELY IN
                 THE PAST AND IS CONTINUING TO.  BUT CHINA WANTS 
                 TO BE ACCEPTED AS A MEMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL 
                 COMMUNITY AS A MAJOR PLAYER.  CHINA WANTS TO BE 
                 A MEMBER OF THE WORD TRADE ORGANIZATION.  CHINA 
                 WANTS TO HAVE A MEETING WITH PRESIDENT CLINTON. 
                 CHINA WANTS TO TAKE STEPS UP THE LADDER TO BE 
                 RECOGNIZED AS A POWER PLAYER, AND IF CHINA IS TO
                 BE RECOGNIZED AS A POWER PLAYER, IF CHINA IS TO 
                 BECOME A MEMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 
                 THAT IS RESPECTED, IT TOO WILL RECOGNIZE THAT IT
                 IS NOT IN BEIJING'S SELF-INTEREST TO PROP UP A 
                 DESPOTIC REGIME SUCH AS EXISTS IN BURMA.

WINER:           EVEN APART FROM LOOKING BEYOND THE BURMA-CHINA 
                 BORDER, DO YOU WANT AS YOUR NEIGHBOR-STATE 
                 GOVERNMENT, AS YOUR PARTNER A GOVERNMENT THAT 
                 LACKS POPULAR LEGITIMACY, WHICH COULD COLLAPSE 
                 FROM WITHIN AND CREATE GRAVE INSTABILITY AND 
                 GRAVE DISCONTINUITY IN YOUR RELATIONSHIP?  DO 
                 YOU WANT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH THAT UNPOPULAR 
                 GOVERNMENT?  I DON'T THINK ANY GOVERNMENT DOES 
                 OR SHOULD.  IT'S A VERY DANGEROUS APPROACH.  AND
                 IT CREATES GRAVE RISKS AND CHINA, LIVING NEXT TO
                 BURMA, CLEARLY RECOGNIZES THE NATURE OF THIS 
                 GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS ANY GOVERNMENT IN THE 
                 WORLD, WHATEVER IT CHOOSES TO DO ABOUT IT.    

HOST:            I'M AFRAID THAT'S ALL THE TIME WE HAVE THIS 
                 WEEK.  I'D LIKE TO THANK OUR GUESTS -- GARE 
                 SMITH, DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR 
                 DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND LABOR;  AND JONATHAN
                 WINER, DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR 
                 INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT 
                 AFFAIRS -- FOR JOINING ME TO DISCUSS U.S. POLICY
                 AND BURMA.  THIS IS ROBERT REILLY FOR ON THE 
                 LINE.