[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
THE BURMESE ECONOMY
BURMESE ECONOMY AND THE WITHDRAWAL OF EUROPEAN TRADE
PREFERENCES
===========================================================
Stefan Collignon
The purpose of this report is to assess the impact of the
temporary withdrawal of the scheme of generalized trade
preference for Burma (Myanmar) as has been decided by the
EU Council of Ministers in March 1997. The European Union's
Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) envisions
suspension in the following cases: Practice of any form of
forced labour. Export of goods made by prison labour.
Inadequate controls on the export or transit of drugs
(illicit substances) or of money laundering.
There is ample evidence that each of these practices
applies to Myanmar. However, the withdrawal of GSP is not
automatic, but subject to a political assessment. Other
countries have taken the lead. Thus, since 1991 the US
government has not granted GSP preferences to imports of
Burmese origin and has declined to renew its bilateral
textile and garment trade agreement. Suspending trade
preferences for Burma by the European Union should take the
following considerations into account:
What impact will it have on the Burmese economy?
What impact would it have on the political regime in
power?
What impact would it have for the long term transition
to a democratic regime in Burma?
In this report I will concentrate on the economic side
of the assessment.
=======================================================
The European Union is sending strong signals to SLORC that
the "constructive engagement" approach is no longer
supported, and without significant reform, both economic
and political, the EU is not prepared to endorse the SLORC
regime.
=======================================================
The country
==============================
Burma is a large country in Southeast Asia, in surface
equivalent to Spain, Portugal and Austria, with a
population of 45 million, slightly less than Spain and
Austria. It is surrounded by the Indian Ocean, Bangladesh,
PR China, Laos and Thailand. With 140 ethnic groups, Burma
is the country with the largest ethnic concentration in the
world (one group per 5000 sq km the equivalent of a French
department). Politically, it became a British colony in
1886 and attained independence in 1948 under the leadership
of General Aung San, who was assassinated in 1947. The first
independent democratic government under U Nu proved
unstable and incapable of dealing with the ethnic issue. It
was replaced in a coup d'etat by General Ne Win in 1962,
who nationalized most of the economy and set the country on
the "Burmese way to socialism". During this time, Burma
became one of the most isolated countries in the world. In
1988, a general uprising by the impoverished population was
violently repressed by the army. Approximately, 2000 to
3000 people were shot dead in the streets.
Subsequently, the army set up a military junta called SLORC
(State Law and Order Restoration Council) which has ruled
the country since then. Although the government held fairly
free elections in 1990, it never recognized the result
which gave 82 per cent majority of the seats to the
opposing National League for Democracy (NLD) led by Aung
San Suu Kyi, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 and
daughter of the Independence Hero. In fact, she was put
under house arrest for six years and her freedom is still
heavily constrained to this day.
Economic growth and standard of living
===========================================================
Foreign visitors arriving in Burma often notice a visible
improvement in apparent signs of wealth in the major
cities, particularly Rangoon and Mandalay, since 1988. This
is manifested in the substantial construction boom between
1988 and 1991, although it has somewhat faltered since
then. However, as soon as one leaves the larger cities, the
situation becomes different. Poverty is widespread and
infrastructures like roads and railways are derelict. In
fact, despite apparent improvements, sustained economic
growth is still not taking place.
After the military coup of 1962 with widespread
nationalization and the embarkation of the "Burmese way to
socialism", growth became volatile and per capita income
stagnated. Negative growth lead to hunger riots in 1967 and
a change in policies: East-European-style industrialization
were to improve economic growth. This inward-looking,
import-substituting development strategy turned out to be a
disaster, despite significant investment in heavy industry.
Growth rates fell and real standards of living did not
improve. In 1974, antigovernment riots sparked by UN
General Secretary U Thant's burial again led to a change in
policy (though not in the political regime). The internal
rice price was raised, the agricultural sector expanded,
and growth resumed at a decent rate, supported by loans
from international donors and agencies. In fact, some
observers argue that economic growth only started after
Myanmar began to accept Overseas Development Aid (ODA).
However, the boom of the late 1970s and early 1980s, but
more importantly because of the grossly overvalued exchange
rate and other incompetent policies. The Burmese government
started to lose foreign currency reserves at a rapid rate.
Contrary to other South East Asian countries, the state run
economy in Burma did not have the flexibility to adjust to
the new environment. With the official real exchange rate
being hopelessly overvalued, competitive exports went
illegally over the border to neighboring countries. At
first, the economic deterioration was masked by substantial
foreign borrowing. Burma's foreign debt rose from US $4
billion in 1988. To alleviate this problem, the government
obtained "least developed country" status in 1987. In the
mid-eighties, the bubble burst: per capita income fell by
22 per cent from 1986 to 1988. Keeping with the established
pattern, this deterioration in living standards again led
to widespread public riots and military repression by the
newly formed SLORC. Given the new government's human rights
record, it was immediately considered as an outcast by the
world. ODA was stopped by industrial countries and the
SLORC was forced to open its economy in order to attract
foreign investment, despite a fundamental xenophobic
attitude. This new development strategy ("open door"
policy) has recently produced some improvements in economic
growth rates. But even with a growth rate of nearly 19 per
cent in the budget year 1995-96, per capita income has just
caught up with the long term trend over the last quarter
century with an abysmal growth rate of 1.12 per cent p.a.
Thus, Burma is far from joining East Asian dragons or
tigers. There is no evidence of a fundamental break in the
growth dynamics of Myanmar.
Today, Myanmar must be counted as one of the poorest
countries in the world. The World Bank ranks Myanmar as the
41st poorest country without indicating GNP data. The UNDP
Human Development Index gives a real GDP per capita of US $
595, calculated at purchasing power parities; it classifies
the country in the "low human development" group (index
0.385) on position 111 out of 160 countries. However, even
this index seems overstated, for evidence in the rural
areas of northern Burma does not coincide with the high
literacy and educational values which keep the index from
falling. Life expectancy seems to be in line with all
developing counties, but the percentage of population with
access to health services, safe water and sanitation is
only half of this standard. The UNDP Human Development
Report shows 16.7 per cent of the total population living
below the poverty line. this situation is also responsible
for the increasing number of economic refugees into
neighboring countries. Two hundred thousand Burmese are
estimated to work illegally in Thailand. According to Asia
Watch, 20,000 Burmese women were forced into prostitution
in Thailand alone during the last two years, but many more
are working in Burma.
Estimating growth and national income is precarious in
Myanmar. Government and information policies are opaque,
statistics often distorted, This report primarily uses
World Bank statistics for the legal economy. However, the
black market economy not only continues to exist in
Myanmar, despite some liberalization, but data are
fundamentally biased by the illicit narcotics economy. The
French Observatoire Geopolitique de la Drogue estimated
that drug revenue from 2800 tons of opium (producing 200
tons heroin) would yield an illegal income between US $ 2
and 8 billion, which compares with official foreign
exchange reserves of $ 200-300 million and a GDP of $ 1.460
million and a GDP of $ 1.460 billion at the unofficial
exchange rate and $ 26.953 billion at the official rate.
This compares with opium production of 400 tons at the end
of the 1950s and 800-900 tons in 1987. Other estimates
calculate annual narcotic incomes of US $ 1.2 to 1.5 bn,
equivalent of 12-15 per cent of GDP. In any case, Myanmar
is the world's largest opium producer, responsible for
nearly all of the heroin consumed in the United States and
a large portion of Europe's narcotic trade.
To Continue.
News and Information Bureau, All Burma Students league
************************( End )****************************
+=====================================+
| A B S L |
+-------------------------------------+
| All Burma Students League |
| 3, Krishna Menon Marg |
| New Delhi - 110011 |
| Ph : 91-11-3017172/3016035 |
| Fx : 91-11-3793397 |
| Email : shar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
+=====================================+