[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
NEWS - Burmese Reshuffle Maintains
- Subject: NEWS - Burmese Reshuffle Maintains
- From: BurmaJapan@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:42:00
Burmese Reshuffle Maintains Unity among Military Rulers
AP
17-NOV-97
BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) During Gen. Ne Win's decades-long
rule of Burma, he
had a simple method for periodically reorganizing his
government: the purge.
Whenever other generals became too powerful or popular,
Ne Win jailed them or
banished them to the borderlands. He retained power, but
he also created enemies
who either plotted against him or joined the democratic
movement.
The top four generals who rule Burma today are more
clever than that.
On Saturday, they dissolved the sinister-sounding SLORC,
the State Law and Order
Restoration Council, which has ruled since September
1988, and replaced it with
the State Peace and Development Council.
Burmese democracy activists-in-exile said generals Than
Shwe, Maung Aye, Khin
Nyunt and Tin Oo had done nothing more than give the
government a more palatable
name while furthering military rule.
They did, however, manage to achieve more than that. In
one sweep, they brought
younger blood into the ruling body, broke up empires
built by some of their rivals
and essentially retired the old guard apparently without
alienating them. The latter
move could have created a rift in the government large
enough to bring it down.
The military leaders answer to no one and almost never
explain their decisions to
outsiders, but the changes appear to have been carried
out in a way in which no
one loses face or leaves embittered.
Ne Win, who ruled from 1962 to 1988, rarely carried out a
major change so
smoothly.
Life probably will be harder for the country's democratic
movement, led by Nobel
laureate Aung San Suu Kyi. By keeping most military
officers relatively happy, it is
less likely that the disgruntled among them will break
ranks and push for
democratic reforms.
In moving former SLORC members into ceremonial posts on a
14-member advisory
board, the leadership broke up a logjam in the upper
echelons of the military that
had denied younger officers upward mobility.
The new makeup of the regime also consolidates power held
by the top four, who
are all in their 60s. Their new supporting cast is from
the next generation. Most are
in their early 50s, with a few in their 40s.
With little known about the younger council members, it
is unclear whether there
might be any reformers among them, but it isn't likely.
The generation gap gives the top four an added dimension
of authority; age and
seniority are important in Burmese culture. The new
council members also are
beholden for their new positions.
The former SLORC members were contemporaries of the top
four. Having held their
positions for many years, several had built up virtual
fiefdoms in the ministries they
controlled.
Stories of payoffs to SLORC members for business deals
were common, and there
were corruption investigations involving the SLORC
forestry minister and commerce
minister's underlings.
Some corruption in Burma's military is unavoidable, as a
general's salary is only
about 3,500 kyats a month, or about $140 on the
widely-used black market
exchange rate. But analysts said some SLORC members
apparently had amassed
enough wealth to displease the top four generals.
In Ne Win's day, that would have been a one-way ticket to
jail or some jungle
outpost fighting guerrillas. Such humiliations and
hardships turned some officers
against him.
The four generals have appeared more adept at ruling than
Ne Win by maintaining
military unity while at the same time overhauling their
government. They also were
able to sign cease-fire agreements to end ethnic
insurgencies.
But despite attempts to attract foreign investment,
Burma's economy is
deteriorating. Inflation is about 40 percent and the kyat
is plummeting. The
international community also is increasingly turning
against the regime because of
its repressive rule and alleged complicity in the drug
trade.
The top four generals have learned a few lessons, but it
remains to be seen whether
they are clever enough to deliver the "peaceful and
prosperous nation" that they
have promised the people of Burma.
EDITOR'S NOTE Bangkok-based correspondent Robert Horn has
been covering
Burma and Southeast Asia for The Associated Press since
1995.