A Shan replies to Okkar's "It's a s (r)

[OKKAR66127@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 98-02-03 05:08:46 EST, brelief@xxxxxxx wrote:


>  Hmmm,
>    Being of somewhat advanced years, and a little behind the times as we
>  are here in the Shan States,  I must say the Na Wa Ta has stooped to new
lows
> in pursuing the success of "Visit Myanmar Year".
 
>   Since it would appear Na Wa Ta has plenty of women to go around,
>  perhaps Okkar might kindly spare a few to minister to needy patients
>  admitted to my clinic.
>  For that matter, since they are now switching tactics with foreign
visitors,
>  they might
>  consider doing the same vis-a-vis the other national races.  Rather than
>  pushy gun-toting soldiers that rape and rob us,  I reckon a couple of
> battalions of freshly ripened strumpets might win more friends among we
> Shan...
 
>    As an aside, though, it would appear from Myanmar Airways most recent
> troubles that the offer of free travel with them is most ill-advised.
> But then the Burman has always been clever.  In big, developed
> countries, when there is a plane crash, usually hundreds die.  Myanmar
> Airways stick to using the F-27, so that when there is a calamity of the
> sort that occurred last week in Sandoway,  the number of unfortunates
> remains in the low double digits.
 
> Regards from the cool, green hills.
 
> from Khun Seng Kahm
 
> http://www2.gol.com/users/brelief/Index.htm

Dear friends,

     I will not be able to do my personal responses to BurmaNet, MAYKHA and
even in SCB for some unpredicted time in the future because of my very very
personal problem. It means that there will be no person to respond you
personally unless another one more person has the courage to respond you
personally.

     But I will try to find the way to respond you without hurting anybody. If
I find it you will see my responses again. 

Okkar

----------------------------

I will always try to help and never try to harm others.