[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Part 2 (SHATTUCK 4/1 REMARKS TO HOU
- Subject: Part 2 (SHATTUCK 4/1 REMARKS TO HOU
- From: moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 16:32:00
>Funding Programs
>
>Mr. Chairman, in addition to designing and implementing mechanisms to
>coordinate U.S. democracy and human rights policy within the Department,
>between agencies, and among our allies, my bureau also is responsible
>for oversight of specific programs designed to promote democracy and,
>when necessary, to respond rapidly to democratization and human rights
>crises. These efforts often evolve from recommendations by policy
>mechanisms such as the Human Rights and Democracy Core Group. Many are
>in countries where USAlD does not have a resident mission and where
>specific, targeted assistance can have an immediate human rights impact.
>Others are directed at human rights crisis situations where my bureau
>can act quickly and flexibly. USAID and the State Department regional
> bureaus are integral parts of the process by which these high-impact
>democracy and human rights programs are allocated.
>
>My bureau, together with the Department of State regional bureaus and
>USAID, exercises oversight over that portion of Economic Support Funds
>(ESF) devoted to building democracy and promoting human rights. Funds
>are administered in one of three ways; 1) through the management of the
>new Human Rights and Democracy Fund; 2) through the co~-management with
>the regional bureaus of Regional Democracy Funds; and 3) through the
>administration of specific projects within these regional funds.
>
>Established in FY 1998, the Human Rights and Democracy Fund (HRDF) is in
>many ways the programmatic complement to the Core Group's policy focus.
>As a funding instrument, the HRDF enables the U.S. to respond to human
>rights or democratization crises, and is used primarily when no other
>appropriate sources are available. By responding rapidly and decisively
>to emergencies as they develop, the fund enables the United States to
>minimize human rights abuses. For example, deploying teams of human
>rights monitors into an area where abuses are occurring can help deter
>further atrocities and gather reliable information upon which to base
>further action.
>
>Funding is considered on a case-by-case basis. I review program
>proposals put forth by an intra-bureau program committee and consult
>with other relevant bureaus and agencies. Congress is notified of
>allocation decisions in those cases when specific programs have not been
>included in the Congressional Presentation Document.
>
>In FY 1998, the Administration requested $8 million for the Human Rights
>and Democracy Fund. In FY 1999, we have requested $9 million.
>
>In addition to the HRDF, my bureau oversees the administration of a
>series of Regional Democracy Funds that provide elections~-related
>assistance; encourage criminal justice reform and judicial training;
>support the establishment of truth commissions and other national
>reconciliation efforts; and promote the development of civil society,
>especially independent media institutions, the growth of human rights
>organizations, and women's political participation. Whereas the Human
>Rights and Democracy Fund focuses primarily on countries emerging from
>catastrophe or conflict, the Regional Democracy Funds tend to focus more
>on countries in transition to democracy. Another important difference is
>that the Regional Democracy Funds are designed to respond flexibly to
>ongoing policy developments, while the Human Rights and Democracy Fund
>addresses immediate or emerging issues. The Regional Democracy Funds
>thus are able to provide more intensive and in-depth non-emergency
>technical assistance, whereas the Human Rights and Democracy fund is
>better suited to respond to crises in regions where Regional Funds may
>be limited.
>
>An interagency group, chaired by my bureau, and including the regional
>bureaus and the USAID Democracy Center, manages regional democracy finds
>in the Middle East, Africa, East Asia and the Pacific, South Asia, and
>Latin America and the Caribbean. In consultation and cooperation with
>USAID we recommend projects based on proposals submitted by our
>embassies, our Washington offices, or U.S. democracy-promotion NGOs. The
>Assistant Secretaries of the regional bureaus and I then jointly make
>final recommendations to the Under Secretary for Security Affairs.
>
>Most of these projects are implemented through agreements with U.S. NGOs
>undertaken by USAID's Center for Democracy and Governance and its field
>missions, or through memoranda of agreement with the Department of
>Justice for training and technical assistance In the event that no other
>U.S. agency is able or willing to carry out a particular agreement, my
>bureau's Program Office has the ability to work directly with U.S. NGOs~
>Our partners in the regional finds currently include the National
>Endowment for Democracy and its four institutes; the International
>Foundation for Electoral Systems; Yale University; and the Asia
>Foundation.
>
>For FY 1999, we are requesting a total of $39.75 million for the
>Regional Democracy Funds: $4 million for the Middle East, $15 million
>for Africa, $5 million for East Asia and the Pacific, $2.75 million for
>South Asia, and $13 million for Latin America and the Caribbean.
>
>Translating Policy and Programs into targeted Assistance
>
>Mr. Chairman, I now would like to offer some examples of how we have
>translated these policy and funding mechanisms into assistance to those
>countries emerging from catastrophe and conflict as well as to those in
>transition from authoritarian rule. These stares often require our help
>to facilitate or consolidate fragile democratic processes, sometimes on
>an emergency basis.
>
>In Bosnia, the Democracy Core Group has recommended finding three
>efforts critical to the Dayton peace process. The United States
>coordinates support for the peace process with our European partners.
>For example, we have developed a strategy, supported by the European
>Union, that was announced at last fall's US-EU summit and has tightened
>economic assistance conditionality and linked it to the turnover of
>indicted war criminals.
>
>Through the Human Rights and Democracy Fund, the United States provides
>assistance to the Annex Six Human Rights Commission, the human tights
>arm of the Dayton peace process ($1.25 million in FY 1998). Our aid has
>permitted an internationally-appointed Human Rights Ombudsperson to
>investigate cases of human rights violations, and a Human Rights
>Chamber, composed of eight international and six Bosnian judges, to
>adjudicate the cases and offer legally-binding judgments.
>
>Through the Human Rights and Democracy Fund, the United States also
>supports the International Commission on Missing Persons, a major U.S.
>initiative to support the peace and reconciliation process in the former
>Yugoslavia ($2 million in FY 1998). Currently chaired by Senator Bob
>Dole, the Commission applies political pressure to the regional parties
>in the former Yugoslavia to expedite resolution of missing persons
>cases; provides assistance to families of the missing; and supports the
>exhumation process and identification of remains where possible.
>
>Finally, the Human Rights and Democracy Fund supports the International
>Criminal tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ($1.27 million in FY 1998).
>Established in 1993, the tribunal is mandated by the ~UN Security
>Council to investigate and prosecute persons who committed war crimes,
>crimes against humanity, genocide, and other serious violations of
>international humanitarian law in the former Yugoslavia. The Dayton
>Agreement binds the parties to cooperate with the tribunal and transfer
>indictees.
>
>Funds ($275,000) have permitted the U.S. to deploy to the Hague a team
>of international attorneys and translators to review on an urgent basis
>the backlog of dossiers of alleged war criminals provided by the
>Bosnian, Croatian, and Serbian governments, helping the tribunal decide
>whether any should be prosecuted internationally. We also provide
>support ($400,000) that furnishes translation assistance and have funded
>($1 million) the construction of a second courtroom so that the tribunal
>can handle simultaneous trials of the many new indictees who have been
>brought into custody over the last year.
>
>Working through the Human Rights and Democracy Core Group, my bureau has
>helped coordinate the Administration's commitment to bring to an end the
>genocide, civil conflicts, and human rights abuses in the Great Lakes
>region of Africa. During her 1997 trip to Africa, the Secretary
>announced a $30 million ($23 million in ESF) Great Lakes Justice
>Initiative, which is designed to help build institutions for the rule of
>law, human rights, and ethnic reconciliation in order to end the reign
>of impunity and cycle of violence in Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic
>Republic of Congo. The importance of this Initiative was underscored by
>the President in his speech last week in Rwanda. The United States is
>undertaking this and other efforts in the region in coordination and
> consultation with our African partners, other donors and NGOs.
>
>The Great Lakes Justice Initiative will work in partnership with
>Africans to identify and fund projects that reform the courts,
>prosecutors, police, and prisons; build institutional capacity; and
>train personnel. It also will assist professional associations,
>universities, and other components of civil society to formulate
>improved laws and practices and support reform in governmental
>institutions of justice. Finally, it will address the role of the
>military by providing technical assistance to increase adherence to
>international human rights standards in the military court system and
>facilitating the demobilization of child soldiers.
>
>U~.S. human rights and democratization funding in the region is not
>limited to the Great Lakes Justice Initiative. Through the Africa
>Regional Democracy Fund ($500,000 in FY 1997), the United States is
>providing support to the office of the United Nations High Commissioner
>for Human Rights to establish the UN investigative team in the
>Democratic Republic of the Congo and enlarge the human rights monitoring
>operations in Rwanda. We also are working with our partners in Europe to
>coordinate assistance to the International War Crimes Tribunal for
>Rwanda so that it may conduct speedier trials and establish a witness
>protection program.
>
>In coordination with the State Department regional bureaus, my bureau
>also provides assistance to countries in transition from authoritarian
>rule or countries moving toward broader democratic participation. In
>Mexico, for example, the Latin America and the Caribbean Regional
>Democracy Fund ($700,000 in FY 1997 and $1 million in FY 1998) augments
>other U.S. Government support of NGO programs that combat pre-election
>fraud and promote free and fair elections. Justice reform also remains
>an important objective. The United States will sponsor an exchange
>program that brings together senior Mexican and U.S. judges; provide
>technical assistance to strengthen court management and reduce caseload
>backlogs; and support NGO activities to increase protection of victims'
>rights. The U.S. also is providing assistance to local-level officials
>and NGOs to manage resources and stimulate local democracy under the
>Mexican Government's plan to decentralize governance. Finally, the U.S.
>is providing technical assistance to support reform of the Mexican
>Congress by improving independent Congressional budget oversight and
>legislative skills.
>
>In Liberia, the Africa Regional Democracy Fund ($1 million in FY 1997)
>facilitated the successful completion of the first competitive
>multi-party elections since the end of the civil war. The July 1997
>elections were considered credible and fair by both international and
>domestic observers, and have paved the way for Liberia to establish a
>viable, democratic system of government.
>
>In Yemen, the NEA Regional Democracy Fund ($275,000 in FY 1997)
>supported a wide-ranging technical assistance program during the
>highly-successful April 1997 parliamentary elections. Through grants to
>the National Democratic Institute and the International Foundation for
>Electoral Systems, the fund helped train elections officials, provided
>technical assistance on ballot design, and supported election-day ballot
>monitoring.
>
>The Bureau also administers a grant ($1 million in FY 1997) to the Yale
>Cambodia Genocide Program, which was initiated in 1994 through an Act of
>Congress. The program assembles evidence concerning the leadership of
>the Khmer Rouge and provides documentation of genocide, war crimes, and
>crimes against humanity. It has established a Documentation Center in
>Cambodia, which conducts research and provides the public with a record
>of the horrors of the Pol Pot Regime. Although the events of last July
>were a major setback to the international effort to promote a stable and
>democratic Cambodia, programs such as this will help Cambodians continue
>their struggle to overcome the catastrophic results of Kh~mer Rouge
>rule.
>
>The Regional Democracy Funds also are intended to provide
>issue~-specific assistance for activities in several countries in a
>given region~. In FY 1997, for example, my bureau directed $500,000 to
>the Asia Foundation for a program that helps women in Cambodia,
>Indonesia, Laos, Mongolia, the Pacific Islands, the Philippines, and
>Thailand challenge economic, social, and political discrimination.
>Working with women activists, women's NGOs, human rights groups and the
>media, the program supports the training of women to conduct public
>education campaigns on women's rights; the design of country-specific
>action plans targeted toward the removal of discriminatory laws and
>policies; and the holding of regional conferences to share successful
>strategies. In addition, the program supported the work of local groups
>and activists to combat violence against women.
>
>My Bureau also is funding the development of an ASEAN human rights
>network ($500,000 in FY 1997). This program will assist the efforts of
>the ASEAN Human Rights Working Group to develop more formal and
>regularized mechanisms for human rights cooperation in the region. It
>also supports efforts to develop effective national human rights
>organizations and strengthen existing human rights NGOs in ASEAN
>member-states as part of an overall strategy to increase the attention
>of ASEAN governments to human rights.
>
>Assistance to Those Opposing Authoritarian Rule
>
>Mr. Chairman, most of our efforts to promote human rights and democracy
>focus on those countries most likely to make the transition to full
>partnership in the international system~. But we also are working to
>assist those who seek to promote democratic progress and human rights in
>authoritarian countries. In these cases, our focus is on supporting NGOs
>that seek to facilitate a peaceful transition to democracy and legal
>institutions that may one day create a foundation for the rule of law.
>
>In the case of Cuba, the United States is providing assistance to
>U.S.-based NGOs to support individuals and organizations that promote
>peaceful democratic change and the strengthening of civil society ($1.~5
>million in FY 1997 and $2 million in FY 1998). Funded programs
>disseminate information to the Cuban people, support the development of
>civil society, and assist human rights groups and victims of
>state-sponsored repression. Programs are conducted pursuant to the
>authorities and purposes of the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 and the
>Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996.
>
>In Burma, my bureau directly administers Economic Support Funds ($2.5
>million in FY 1997 and $5 million in FY 1998) that are divided between
>democracy-buildin~g assistance through a grant to the National Endowment
>for Democracy and humanitarian assistance through the International
>Rescue Committee and World Concern Development Organization. Supported
>activities include pro~-democracy work by such organizations as the Free
>Trade Union of Burma; efforts by the National Coalition for Democracy to
>focus international concern on Burma; the publication of pro-democracy
>journals; and the broadcast of independent voices via radio.
>
>In China, there are major obstacles to the development of a justice
>system that protects and promotes the rights of the individual. As our
>most recent human rights report noted, China's Constitution provides in
>theory for an independent judiciary. In practice, however, the judicial
>system is subject to the "policy guidance" of the Chinese Communist
>Party and continues to deny defendants basic legal safeguards and due
>process because authorities attach higher priority to maintaining public
>order and suppressing political opposition than to implementing and
>enforcing legal norms. Security police and personnel have been
>responsible for numerous human rights abuses. Arbitrary arrest and
>detention remain major systemic problems.
>
>Yet China has made some progress on legal reform. Legislation passed in
>recent years includes a number of laws with a potentially positive
>impact on citizens' rights~. For example, the revised Criminal Procedure
>Law, which came into effect in January 1997, provides for a defendant's
>right to legal counsel, an active legal defense and other rights
>recognized in international human rights instruments. If fully
>implemented, the law would bring China's criminal law system closer
>toward compliance with international norms. The recent commitment by the
>Government of China to sign the International Covenant on Civil and
>Political Rights also is a positive step. Accession to the Covenant
>requires the Chinese to adhere to international standards on torture,
>arbitrary detention, fair trial, and freedom of expression and
>association, to name but a few. It creates a tool with which the
>international community can measure the Chinese Government's commitment
>and adherence to international standards.
>
>To facilitate promotion of the rule of law in China, the United States
>proposes to use Regional Democracy Funds to implement the October 1997
>~summit agreement between the United States and China to cooperate on
>rule of law issues. This ~agreement, reached between President Clinton
>and China's President Jiang Zemin, presents an opening to improve basic
>legal institutions in China -- the judiciary, the administrative
>process, the legal profession, law schools and legal information
>systems~.
>
>Proposed activities include expanded exchanges of legal experts,
>training of judges and lawyers, the exchange of legal materials, sharing
>ideas about legal assistance for the poor, working on administrative
>procedure reforms, and strengthening commercial law and arbitration. No
>U.S. funds would directly fund institutions of the Governme~nt of China.
>For the most part, they would go to U.S. governmental and
>non-governmental actors with a proven track record of promoting the rule
>of law, including in China. Many of these organizations have expressed
>interest in such a project. For example, the American Bar Association,
>whose exemplary work in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union has
>made significant contributions to the rule of law in that region, has
>proposed to launch a similar program on China.
>
>Not only will the initiative create significant opportunities for
>improving China's legal ~~system, it also will further a broad range of
>American interests and values. I must emphasize, however, that these
>programs are not a replacement for our human rights policy on China. We
>will continue to pursue vigorously our human rights objectives in China
>through existing diplomatic and policy tools. That said, I feel that
>rule of law activities can make a significant contribution to the
>improvement of Chinese legal institutions in a way that, over time, is
>likely to improve the legal protections guaranteed to all Chinese
>citizens.
>
>Conclusion
>
>Mr. Chairman, my testimony today has focused on the variety of policy
>and funding mechanisms that my bureau has developed in order to enable
>the United States to respond quickly to a variety of humanitarian, human
>rights and democratization problems and crises. But it would be a
>mistake to conclude without reviewing briefly my bureau's other, equally
>important activities, about which I have recently testified before the
>House International Relations Committee.
>
>The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor has as one of its
>primary missions the spotlighting of human rights abuses in all
>countries of the world. It does so primarily through the preparation and
>release of the annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. We
>disseminate these Reports in 193 countries to governments, media and
>citizens. We express our positions vigorously and publicly~. Almost
>daily, the Department speaks out on human rights. Speaking truth to
>power is always an important weapon against oppression and injustice~.
>
>But it is only one weapon. Our arsenal for promoting human rights
>objectives is an increasingly broad one. We employ it actively. It
>includes both traditional diplomacy and a range of new approaches that
>we continue to expand and develop.
>
>We support INS Asylum Officers and Immigration Judges by providing them
>with expert advice on human rights conditions and recent political
>developments overseas. For the past year we have placed our emphasis on
>improving the quality of this information, particularly by strengthening
>our "Profiles of Asylum Claims and Country Conditions Reports" and by
>paying increased attention to issues of religious persecution. In the
>coming year, we plan, for the first time, to create a full-time
>permanent staff that will have responsibility for both commenting on
>asylum applications and preparing the annual Country Reports on Human
>Rights Practices. We believe having the same professional staff work
>year-round on issues of persecution and mistreatment will strengthen
>both our advice to asylum adjudicators and our annual Reports.
>
>We support the efforts of free trade unions around the world to become
>more effective defenders of worker and human rights. Free trade unions
>played a critical role in promoting and defending democracy in the Cold
>War era. They play an equally important role today by working to
>eliminate child labor and bring about more equitable distribution of
>economic benefits. In line with the administration's Model Business
>Principles~, my bureau supports the joint efforts of union and employer
>groups to promote the adoption of corporate codes of conduct that
>strengthen democratic values in the workplace.
>
>We work closely with non-governmental organizations to promote core
>human rights principles, including religious freedom and women's
>rights~. During my tenure, I have facilitated broad and regular
>communication between the human rights community and the Department of
>State. The Advisory Committee on Religious Freedom Abroad is only one
>example of that effort.
>
>Through bilateral measures, we address democracy and human rights
>concerns in all our relationships. In addition to assistance programs
>and diplomatic engagement, we employ a wide variety of other measures,
>including sanctions and restrictions on international financing, arms
>sales and visas. The President, the First Lady, the Vice President, and
>the Secretary of State all repeatedly raise specific human rights cases
>and our work to promote democracy in their meetings with foreign
>leaders~. For example, President Clinton has raised human rights and
>democratization concerns at every stop during his trip to Africa,
>emphasizing particularly his commitment to strengthen international
>efforts to prevent genocide. Secretary Albright's deep personal
>commitment to these issues makes her a particularly forceful and
>effective advocate. She has instructed our ambassadors on dozens of
>occasions to raise specific human rights issues with their host
>governments.
>
>Finally, we work closely with Congress to coordinate our efforts and
>develop a consensus on the best means and direction for United States
>policy in the field of human rights, democracy and labor. I would like
>to offer my thanks to the Members of Congress and in particular to the
>Members of this Committee for their strong support of our efforts to
>promote and protect human rights and democracy around the world. Your
>support has been bipartisan and bicameral, and we have worked together
>to address the challenges of the post-Cold War world. Our goal is to
>expand the community of democratic nations so that the world will be
>better-equipped to confront the dangers and challenges of
>under~development, conflict, catastrophe, or authoritarian rule.
>
>Thank you.
>
>(end text)
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>