[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
BP: Editorial: The fight for
- Subject: BP: Editorial: The fight for
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 08:12:00
June 8, 1998
Editorial
The fight for a
drug-free zone
At least 150 nations, including 30 of their presidents and prime
ministers, will speak at a three-day, special session of the United
Nations General Assembly. Special night sessions have been
added just to accommodate the speakers. The topic is drugs,
and the organiser is the eight-year-old UN International Drug
Control Programme. The outcome will be a call for reduced drug
demand and supply by 2000.
It is difficult to avoid cynicism over the anti-drug programmes.
Statistics and the view from the street both indicate the same
dreary pessimism. There are 190 million people using illicit drugs
worldwide. The criminal syndicates are mushrooming, laundering
billions of dollars through governments like Burma or banks using
the latest Internet technology to keep ahead of the law. Nations
remain left behind by the new, international criminal working
across borders.
This depressing view has convinced several prominent old men
and women to call on the special UN meeting to stop the war on
drugs. The former UN secretary-general, the former Dutch
premier, the former presidents of Colombia and Bolivia - these
are a few who have signed a protest letter to the UN conference.
They want a change in policy. The current course, they claim, is
not cost-effective.
This is all very well, but however sincere these former leaders
may be now, they are misguided. Let us remember, first, that
they are speaking about our children and our country. Demands
to liberalise or even to abolish drug laws may make sense to
some. They probably would not have a daughter hooked on
heroin. They probably do not live in a neighbourhood where the
local drug dealer is terrorising their son for not paying for his
latest amphetamine bill.
The UN has been most helpful in fighting the war on drugs. It
had both aid and advice for Thailand when we began our
crop-substitution programme almost 30 years ago. Thailand
once was ridiculed around the world for our corrupt authorities
who helped peddle narcotics. Now, we are often cited as a
success story. Our farmers grow potatoes for McDonald?s and
flowers for Mother?s Day - not opium for traffickers.
But the UN has grown less dynamic in recent years. Its drug
programmes, like many other UN projects, have been hurt
chiefly by stifling bureaucracy and lack of funds. In a way, the
whole United Nations is on a sort of trial at the conference which
begins this evening. It has to be tough and realistic, and the
conference documents probably will achieve that. But the UN
must also prove it has an important place in combatting illegal
drugs trafficking.
The sponsoring UNDCP has been showing signs of life that are
highly unusual in the United Nations. Undersecretary-General
Pino Arlacchi, the agency?s executive director, has been both
articulate and active. In the past six months, he has formulated a
plan to eliminate illicit drug crops in 10 years. He cites Thailand
and Pakistan as the proof that crop substitution and other plans
can succeed.
Our prime minister, Chuan Leekpai, is staying home to look after
the economy. But Thailand will be well represented by Bhichai
Rattakul, the deputy premier and former foreign minister. He is
expected to launch a call for a drug-free zone in Southeast Asia.
That means Asean must agree to step up its efforts - and that, in
turn, means that Burma and Cambodia will have to be
convinced, or shamed, into halting cooperation with drug barons.
The Thai call, for all the difficulties it faces, is certainly realistic
and principled. Making the country, and the region, free of drugs
will be no easy task. But setting the goal is a good idea. Two
decades ago, it would have been ridiculous to talk of a drug-free
zone. Today, it is a goal that, with hard work, we can meet.
© The Post Publishing Public Co., Ltd. All rights reserved 1998
Contact the Bangkok Post
Web Comments: Webmaster
Last Modified: Mon, Jun 8, 1998