[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
EDITORIAL: EU sanctions against Bur
- Subject: EDITORIAL: EU sanctions against Bur
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 19:58:00
Subject: EDITORIAL: EU sanctions against Burma welcome
Editorial & Opinion
EDITORIAL: EU sanctions
against Burma welcome
The European Union has passed its verdict
on the situation in Burma by renewing its
1996 sanctions against the country. The EU
foreign ministers expressed deep concern
at the lack of a positive response from the
State Peace and Development Council
(SPDC) to their call for promotion of
democracy and human rights and for
national reconciliation.
The new sanctions, which will begin this
weekend, will now include bans on transit
visas for military authorities and entry visas
for tourism officials. As such, armed forces
officers and members of the SPDC cannot
enter EU member countries to go on to
third countries.
This is the first response by the West since
the deterioration of the political situation
inside Burma, particularly since the bridge
standoff between the SPDC and the
National Democracy League of Aung Sann
Suu Kyi in July. Since then the overall
condition has worsened with more
intimidation and political suppression, and
over 200 members of the opposition party
have been arrested, though some were
released early this week.
Burma's admission to Asean has become
the biggest headache for the grouping. As
the oldest dialogue partner of Asean, The
EU has been very generous in providing
assistance to Asean since it forged the
partnership in 1977. The EU remains one
of the most active partners despite the
lackadaisical attitudes of some key
dialogue partners in recent years.
Although the EU has widened the
sanctions, it remains conciliatory towards
Asean because the ongoing stalemate on
bilateral relations is not a cause celebre.
Thailand, which is the coordinator for the
Asean-EU dialogue, has been working
painstakingly to break the deadlock since
July last year, but neither side has budged.
Thailand has been caught in the middle,
trying to accommodate each side's
requests. Asean has argued that Burma, as
a full member, should be part of the 1980
bilateral cooperative agreement, but the EU
refuses to admit the pariah state on
grounds of gross human-rights violations
and continued political suppression.
In this context the latest EU position
allowing Burma one-time participation in
the much-delayed 13th Asean-EU Joint
Cooperative Committee, to be held here
later this year, is considered an act of
goodwill. Doubtless it is also due to the
EU's respect for Thailand's effort and
contribution. However, when the next
meeting comes around in the next 18
months in an EU member country it will be a
different ball game. Burma's participation
will hinge on improvement in its
human-rights record. There will be no more
excuses.
The EU also wants to broaden the
cooperative framework of the Asia-Europe
Meeting (Asem). If overall Asean-EU ties
continue as chilled as they are today, it will
have far-reaching repercussions on future
Asem cooperation. It is not worth rocking
the boat.
Apart from the EU, international pressure
will come from the UN resolution on the
situation in Burma expected to be passed
early next month. The draft is near
completion and awaits input from Alvaro de
Soto, an assistant UN secretary-general
who is currently on a four-day visit to
Burma. His visit came about after long
negotiations between the SPDC leaders
and the UN. Rangoon has rejected a
proposed visit by UN special envoy Ismail
Razali, a former president of the UN
General Assembly, for a fact-finding trip on
the treatment of Suu Kyi by the Burmese
junta.
But there is one last caveat, whatever the
EU decision entails and the UN resolution
details: SPDC brutality and violation of
human rights cannot be condoned.
The Nation