[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
NEWS - for Refugees, only Uncertain
- Subject: NEWS - for Refugees, only Uncertain
- From: Rangoonp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 21:52:00
Subject: NEWS - for Refugees, only Uncertainty Is Certain
Rights-Burma: for Refugees, only Uncertainty Is Certain
Inter Press Service
10-FEB-99
CHIANG MAI, Thailand, (Feb. 10) IPS - Hundreds of
thousands of Burmese refugees huddle in front of fires in
secret hideouts across the border in Thailand or in camps
overseen by Thai authorities, their future hanging in
painful
suspense.
Most of them are unsure if winter will be spent in
relative
safety on Thai soil or if they will be pushed back into
Burma,
to face the dry season onslaught of the Burmese army.
Abandoned by the international community and persecuted
by their own government, the only hope for these
refugees,
most of whom belong to ethnic minority groups, are
non-governmental organizations who offer some material
help inside, and sometimes outside, the few refugee camps
along the border.
Their plight is bringing international bodies like the
United
Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) into harsh
scrutiny, for their lack of response to the refugee
problem
along the Thai- Burma border.
Critics contrast this to the UNHCR's high-profile
involvement
with Cambodian refugees in the past two decades.
"I am writing to express my concern over the protracted
silence of the United Nations High Commission for
Refugees
in Bangkok in the face of ongoing abuse of Burmese
refugees by the Thai Government, army and police force,"
said "an overlooked refugee from Burma" in one of several
letters criticizing the UNHCR published in a
Bangkok-based
English daily.
Of primary concern, the letter states, is "the issue of a
lack of
recognition and protection for these refugees" by UNHCR.
"The UNHCR's 'indifference' is a direct reflection of the
lack
of geopolitical interest of the international community
and
donors in Burma," says an NGO activist working with
refugees.
This, he adds, is reflected in what critics say is
UNHCR's
ineffectiveness, unclear mandate, diplomatic paralysis,
and
neglect that seem to have plagued its work with Burmese
refugees.
But UNHCR officials in Bangkok say otherwise, saying its
wider presence on the border will allow it to become more
familiar with refugees from Burma. "Whereas we have long
familiarity with other groups who have crossed the
borders
with Laos and Cambodia, we are not so familiar with those
entering Thailand from Myanmar (Burma)," said Rob
Burrows, a spokesman, in reply to written questions from
IPS.
While the United States and many European nations have
been very vocal in condemning the Burmese government,
NGO workers say they do not consider the country as
politically important as Yugoslavia or Iraq and hence
have
done little to help the victims of the regime's policies.
Following the toppling of the Pol Pot regime by the
Vietnamese army-backed rebel forces, thousands of
Cambodians crossed over into Thailand. After an initial
period of confusion the UNHCR set up some of the largest
refugee camps of their kind anywhere in the world
catering
to more than 300,000 people.
Because of its political significance at that time, as
William
Shawcross notes in his book "The Quality of Mercy," "so
keen were the Western donors to provide money for
UNHCR's work in Thailand, that refugees there had more
dollars per head spent on them than refugees anywhere
else
in the world."
For Thailand too, the refugee camps were useful both for
the
revenues they brought to the economy and the
ego-political
purpose they served, since successive Thai governments
have seen Cambodia as a buffer against "communist
threats"
from Vietnam.
In the case of Burmese refugees however, the record of
both
the UNHCR as well as the Thai government has been very
different, critics say.
While till the mid-80s influxes of Karen, Mon, Karenni
and
other ethnic minority groups fleeing attacks by the
Burmese
army were tolerated by the Thai government, it tightened
entry when more than 7,000 Burmese student activists fled
across the border after a bloody suppression of the 1988
pro-democracy uprising.
The Thai government's crackdowns on Burmese refugees
further intensified after closer economic ties were
established between the two countries in 1992.
In the early nineties, initially some students, under the
aegis
of the UNHCR, were granted "refugee" status. But soon
Thai
authorities decided that using terms like "temporarily
displaced persons" and "illegal migrants" suited their
interests better, giving them greater flexibility
vis-a-vis the
fleeing Burmese.
The UNHCR showed no real interest on the Thai-Burma
border, critics say. It was only in 1992 that for the
first time
UNHCR officials went to the border to assess situation in
the
camps.
"UNHCR's apparent lack of interest in the border refugees
was interpreted by the Thai government as confirmation
that
the ethnic minorities were not really refugees, and the
Thai
classification, 'temporarily displaced', went
unchallenged,"
says "Unwanted and Unprotected: Burmese Refugees in
Thailand," a recent report by the human rights NGO, Human
Rights Watch.
As a result, there has been little supervision of the
regular
'forced' repatriation by the Thai army of thousands of
Mon,
Shan, Karen and Karenni refugees and Burmese students, it
said.
This has in turn reinforced UNHCR's policy of not
annoying
its host government, and to maintain its offices in
Bangkok,
and more recently in Mae Hong Son, Tak and Kanchanaburi
provinces along the Thai-Burma border.
Early this year it was allowed to open these three new
offices, ostensibly to enhance the agency's role in four
areas: witnessing admission, assisting Thai authorities
in
registration, assisting in the relocation of temporary
shelters
and helping Burmese displaced persons with safe return.
Burrows said UNHCR has been granted by the Thai
government an "expanded role" at the border with Burma.
"We envisage our main tasks at present to observe the
Royal Thai Government's process of admission to persons
fleeing fighting or the consequences of civil war," he
says.
But few expect any long-term solutions for the displaced
Burmese, given the UNHCR's narrow definition of
"refugees"
-- taken usually to mean only those with a well-founded
fear
of persecution owing to political beliefs -- and given
Thailand's refusal to ratify the 1951 United Nations
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.
"There is a lot of fear amongst refugees regarding
UNHCR's
new screening process on the border," says an activist
working with refugees who did not want to be named. "When
they ask questions about where people are coming from,
there is a genuine fear of being forcibly repatriated,"
she
added.
Still, Burrows said that though Thailand is not a
signatory to
the convention on refugees, the government has granted
temporary asylum to some 1.4 million refugees and
displaced persons since 1975. "For that it deserves due
credit."