[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
VOICING MY THOUGHTS: Nudge Burm
- Subject: VOICING MY THOUGHTS: Nudge Burm
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 19:04:00
Subject: VOICING MY THOUGHTS: Nudge Burma towards democracy
Editorial & Opinion
VOICING MY THOUGHTS:
Nudge Burma towards
democracy
National League for Democracy leader Aung
San Suu Kyi has urged the foreign
community, and in particular Asean, to do
more to help the people of Burma.
RANGOON -- The democratisation process in
Burma can be accelerated if the international
community -- the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (Asean), in particular --
increases pressure on the military regime.
The junta continues to frustrate the will of the
people by refusing to honour the results of
the 1990 parliamentary elections, which the
opposition National League for Democracy
(NLD) won by a landslide (obtaining 392 of
the 485 parliamentary seats).
Human rights activists and many NLD
members and supporters are languishing in
Burmese jails while the junta, which calls itself
the State Peace and Development Council
(SPDC), continues to harass, intimidate and
repress pro-democracy advocates.
We in the opposition cannot allow any
authoritarian government to hijack the
elections and are determined to continue with
our struggle.
We believe that support from Asean -- which
comprises Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia,
Philippines, Singapore, Brunei, Laos and
Vietnam and which Burma recently joined -- is
crucial to our quest for democracy.
If Asean can persuade or put pressure on the
present regime to convene the Parliament
that was elected by the people, this could be
the first step towards democratisation.
While some countries are very active in
helping hasten this process, the Asean
countries are not. Indeed, quite a few Asean
governments -- though not the public -- justify
not helping by invoking the argument that
democracy is a Western concept and that
Asian values must be upheld.
We do not accept the notion that democracy
is a Western value. To the contrary,
democracy simply means good government
rooted in responsibility, transparency, and
accountability. No authoritarian system can
assure good government because there is no
accountability. The government can get away
with whatever it does.
Asean also invokes the principle of
non-interference with the internal affairs of
member-countries, though not with a clear
conscience. Rather, they are afraid that there
may be some aspects of their countries that
might invite criticism. Our position is that if
they have problems that invite legitimate
criticism, let there be criticism. If not, they
have nothing to fear.
Because of its policy of non-interference,
Asean has rejected calls from other
governments outside the region to nudge the
Burmese government into allowing greater
freedom for its people.
Instead, it has opted for a non-confrontational
''constructive engagement'' stance in relation
to Rangoon. This has not worked.
This policy of non-interference is just an
excuse for not helping. In this day and age,
you cannot avoid interference in the matters
of other countries.
For example, many Asean countries are
investing in Burma. Is that not interference in
our internal affairs? How can they say they
will get involved in economic matters but not
in politics. Economics and politics are
unquestionably closely related.
Foreign investment has provided Burma's
military junta with legitimacy and propped up
the regime. Among Asean countries
Indonesia is the biggest investor in Burma
and was its strongest supporter during the
time the military regime sought international
respectability through gaining admission into
Asean.
It is time for a new initiative on the part of the
Asean members to impress on the junta the
need to open a dialogue with the NLD.
Asean members must recognise that it is the
military regime that is being inflexible and not
the NLD, as the government's propaganda
asserts. We have bent over backwards to
make dialogue possible.
But the military regime does not want
dialogue because they think that dialogue
would be the beginning of the end for them.
That would not be the case, because real
dialogue should be acceptable and beneficial
to everybody, including the military regime.
The military's current position of simply
clinging to power by instilling fear among the
people through force is not good for the
country or for them. A negotiated settlement
is a far better option for everyone.
BY AUNG SAN SUU KYI
The Nation