[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

OPINION: SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST STATE

Subject: OPINION: SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST STATE VIOLENCE

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BF0D37.3CD4BAC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

OPINION: SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST STATE VIOLENCE


I have never say that violence will solve problems. Must less a =
political
one. But you must differentiate between "state violence" and =
"self-defense".

Do you sincerely think the PLO will reach the stage of what it is today =
by
civil-disobedience or non-violence activities? The same is also true =
with
the IRA.

But this is not to say that violence has to be promoted. This tool and
instrument have been there for a long time and the oppressed people will
continue to use it, so long as civil governance and democratic system =
are
not in place. You earnestly wouldn't like to face your opponent with a =
bare
hand, when he is armed to teeth and also merciless and brutal.

What I wanted to point out is that the use of self-defense is an act of
desperation but at times, could change the power equation or balance of
power. This in turn could foster the atmosphere of dailogue, if the
adversary started to think he'll be losing more without negotiation or a
political settlement. Of course, apart from self-defense, a combination =
of
other activities - such as politcal activities within the legal fold,
economic sanctions, armed resistance and so on - would also be needed to
reach a more balance of power stage. Only after this could we start a
meaningful dailogue for lasting solution not before. If we start a =
dailogue
from an inferior position, we'll never be able to cut a fair deal and =
would
end up losing more than we expect.

Forging unity has always been the most difficult task within the =
opposition
camps. As stated previously, the democracy movement has never possessed =
a
unified command domestically and abroad activists of all stripes. Just =
look
at the armed resistance groups. They are divided into two main =
categories,
cease-fire and those still waging active resistance. On the level of =
"real
politik" within the country, the NLD and non-Burman political parties =
such
as SNLD etc. have failed to motivate the electorate to pressure the =
ruling
military clique, up till now.

The point is that however much we like all opposing groups to toe the =
line
of DASSK, there will still be such groups like the recent hostage-takers
which no one can control.

I have no argument that dailogue is the most appropriate way to achieve
durable and lasting solution to this deeply divided society. As for
devastation, it is already there for all strata of the so-called Union =
of
Burma. It could not be darker than midnight.




------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BF0D37.3CD4BAC0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV align=3Djustify><FONT face=3DArial size=3D3><STRONG>OPINION: =
SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST=20
STATE VIOLENCE</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Djustify>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Djustify>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Djustify><FONT face=3DArial><FONT size=3D3>I have never say =
that violence=20
will solve problems. Must less a political<BR>one. But you must =
differentiate=20
between "state violence" and "self-defense".<BR><BR>Do you sincerely =
think the=20
PLO will reach the stage of what it is today by<BR>civil-disobedience or =

non-violence activities? The same is also true with<BR>the =
IRA.<BR><BR>But this=20
is not to say that violence has to be promoted. This tool =
and<BR>instrument have=20
been there for a long time and the oppressed people will<BR>continue to =
use it,=20
so long as civil governance and democratic system are<BR>not in place. =
You=20
earnestly wouldn't like to face your opponent with a bare<BR>hand, when =
he is=20
armed to teeth and also merciless and brutal.<BR><BR>What I wanted to =
point out=20
is that the use of self-defense is an act of<BR>desperation but at =
times, could=20
change the power equation or balance of<BR>power. This in turn could =
foster the=20
atmosphere of dailogue, if the<BR>adversary started to think he'll be =
losing=20
more without negotiation or a<BR>political settlement. Of course, apart =
from=20
self-defense, a combination of<BR>other activities - such as politcal =
activities=20
within the legal fold,<BR>economic sanctions, armed resistance and so on =
- would=20
also be needed to<BR>reach a more balance of power stage. Only after =
this could=20
we start a<BR>meaningful dailogue for lasting solution not before. If we =
start a=20
dailogue<BR>from an inferior position, we'll never be able to cut a fair =
deal=20
and would<BR>end up losing more than we expect.<BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<DIV align=3Djustify><FONT face=3DArial><FONT size=3D3>Forging unity has =
always been=20
the most difficult task within the opposition<BR>camps. As stated =
previously,=20
the democracy movement has never possessed a<BR>unified command =
domestically and=20
abroad activists of all stripes. Just look<BR>at the armed resistance =
groups.=20
They are divided into two main categories,<BR>cease-fire and those still =
waging=20
active resistance. On the level of "real<BR>politik" within the country, =
the NLD=20
and non-Burman political parties such<BR>as SNLD etc. have failed to =
motivate=20
the electorate to pressure the ruling<BR>military clique, up till=20
now.<BR><BR>The point is that however much we like all opposing groups =
to toe=20
the line<BR>of DASSK, there will still be such groups like the recent=20
hostage-takers<BR>which no one can control.<BR><BR>I have no argument =
that=20
dailogue is the most appropriate way to achieve<BR>durable and lasting =
solution=20
to this deeply divided society. As for<BR>devastation, it is already =
there for=20
all strata of the so-called Union of<BR>Burma. It could not be darker =
than=20
midnight.<BR><BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BF0D37.3CD4BAC0--