[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Burma vs. Conservative ideologies (r)
- Subject: Burma vs. Conservative ideologies (r)
- From: MSoe9872@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 21:59:00
Subject: Burma vs. Conservative Ideologies Part III....indiana
more info about Burma studies Group: http://www.student.ipfw.edu/~soem01
Burma vs. Conservative Ideologies Part III....indiana
From 1980s to 1990s, most of the ministers, G.Ms ( General Managers ) and
M.Ds are military officers and they worked in government's departments
and corporations during BSPP, SLORC, SPDC's administrsation. No room and no
chair is available for non-uniform people who are really public-spirited
because BSPP, SLORC, and spdc believed military management and administration
would reform its economy in Burma. It was really ridiculous. No country has
this kind of stupid management and administration for 37 yrs. Here had
problems. E.g, Colonel Tun Myint was appointed as a General Manager for
Health Department by BSPP, and he tried the best what he can do with his
military experience. However, he could not utilize his military skills in
medical field to improve. That was not his fault. That was BSPP's
mismanagement and misadministration. They appointed a wrong person to manage
this department.The only result was a lot of professors and specilists in
medical field were leaving Burma, and no medicine was available in public
hospitals. No finding and no improvement were coming out in this department.
Now, we could see that spdc still want another stupid operation for
Burma. How many years they want to operate Burma as an experimental field.
Schizophrenic generals still believe their way to totalitarianism is better
than others. They believe their dogs are playing very good rather than
others because of their dogs. We can also see this kind of attitude among
Burmese people because most of them were growing up under BSPP, and they
thought they know better than others.
They need resolving issues with others and dealing with change. Don't give
an unreasonable pretext that Burma is OK. If their fact is based and
calculated on government employees, that might be right. Alomst 50 million
people are living in Burma, we need to deeply consider their current life
style, living standard, and moral development in society. Military leaders
should accept the moral development. Every society has a moral order that is
, a shared view of right and wrong. Without moral order a society soon would
fall apart. People would not know what to expect from themselves and one
another, and socil relationships would be impossible to maintain.
And also, we need to consider price unstability in all goods and services,
super highway inflation ( $ 1=370 kyats ), money supply, production power,
economic activities, unbalance export and import situation, infrastructure (
don't compare 1998 with 1962, compare with neighbour countries. Don't look at
your own room, look at your outside what they have ), unemployment rate,
future generation, Health and Education sectors in Burma.
Military generals should figure out how to get more active involvement and
creativity from their own people. Military way to market economy have been
almost 40 years.
Do they still want to go?
((((((((((((((( Consider!!!!!!! Restructure or Die? )))))))))))))))))))))
Msoe
Indiana University
Burma Studies Group