[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
[theburmanetnews] BurmaNet News: Ju
Reply-To: theburmanetnews-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [theburmanetnews] BurmaNet News: June 17, 2000
______________ THE BURMANET NEWS ______________
An on-line newspaper covering Burma
______________ www.burmanet.org _______________
June 17, 2000
Issue # 1555
The BurmaNet News is viewable online at:
http://theburmanetnews.editthispage.com
NOTED IN PASSING:
(1) " unprecedented punitive measures that are tantamount to the
imposition of global sanctions."
Yindee Lertcharoenchok describing the ILO's action to punish Burma
for using forced labor. (See THE NATION: FROM THE EDGE: ILO SETS
STAGE FOR BURMA SHOWDOWN)
``We cannot ban individuals from travelling, but every British
tourist who goes there should know that they have to exchange US$300
on arrival. Every one of these dollars will directly support the
regime. Anyone even thinking of going to Burma (Myanmar) should be
under no illusion as to what is happening there.''
John Battle, British Foreign Office Minister (See REUTERS: BRITAIN
URGES TOURISTS TO AVOID MYANMAR)
*Inside Burma
SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS: MORE DETAILS ON THE SHAN MASSACRE
SURFACING
CHIN HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION: CHRISTIAN CHURCH ORDER TO DEMOLISH
IN HAKA, CHIN STATE
ARNO NEWSLETTER MONTHLY: LAND CONFISCATED FROM THE ROHINGYAS TO BUILD
PAGODA AND MILITARY BASES
SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS: SHAN STATE: CONTINUATION OF FORCED
LABOUR IN FULL SWING, AMID REJECTION OF ILO RESOLUTION
*Regional
THE NATION: ASEAN SPLIT BY ILO MOVE ON FORCED LABOUR
THE NATION: BURMESE REFUGEES AT SALWEEN CAMP WILL BE RELOCATED
AP: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH CRITICIZES THAILAND FOR EXPELLING KAREN
*International
THE NATION: FROM THE EDGE: ILO SETS STAGE FOR BURMA SHOWDOWN
REUTERS: BRITAIN URGES TOURISTS TO AVOID MYANMAR
*Economy/Business
BUSINESS WEEK: LABOR STANDARDS WITH TEETH?
*Opinion/Editorials
THE NATION: EDITORIAL: THAILAND SHOWS ITS OWN MIND ON ILO VOTE
BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE: JOHN BATTLE'S SPEECH AT LEEDS UNIVERSITY,
LONDON
*Other
PD BURMA: CALENDAR OF EVENTS WITH REGARD TO BURMA
__________________ INSIDE BURMA ____________________
SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS: MORE DETAILS ON THE SHAN MASSACRE
SURFACING
16 June 2000
No: 6 - 5
(Reported by Maihoong)
S.H.A.N. has learned from recent refugees in Fang about the details
of the massacre in southern Shan State that was reported on 7 June
2000.
On 23 May, Capt. Than Aung of IB 246 (Kunhing), commanding a 90-100
strong column, made a patrol south of the Namzang-Kunhing road,
rounded 64 people working in the rice and sesame fields near the
deserted village of Hueypu, Hsaimong Tract, Kunhing Township and shot
everyone down in cold blood, said the refugees. (The 7 June report
says the incident occurred on 29 or 30 May in Kenglom where 62 people
were killed. The latest one is being supported by a separate
source).
The relatives of the victims discovered them when they went in search
of them in the fields later. It was also learned that one of the
porters made an appeal on their behalf and was shot along with the
ill-fated villagers. Others found in isolated fields were also shot
on sight.
"It was in revenge of the (9 May) ambush, when the Shan State Army
killed a number of soldiers that included some high ranking
officers," said the sources.
Most of the people who were relocated in Kunhing between 1996-98 were
permitted to engage in farming land 3 miles on each side of the road.
The victims were all from the relocated sites.
Names of some of the victims
CHIN HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION: CHRISTIAN CHURCH ORDER TO DEMOLISH
IN HAKA, CHIN STATE
June 14, 2000
On 12 June 2000 Chin Human Rights Organization CHRO received a report
from reliable source that the Burmese military junta State Peace and
Development Council SPDC had issued an order to demolish United
Pentecostal Church at Cherry Street, down town Haka, the capital of
Chin State in Burma. In addition, the minister of the church Rev.
Tin Hei is on trial at Chin State court. Now the citizens of Haka (
all denominations ) are trying to defend the church and the minister.
The report was confirmed by a pastor from the same denomination of
Rangoon who is now studying in United States. The pastor said that
they spent a good deal of money to get permission from the authority
and the Church was constructed after they got permission from
Ministry of Religion. The church building was completed in 1999.
In January 1999, six pastors including a woman minister were arrested
for erecting a cross on their mountain top in the town of Thantlang
which is 20 miles away from Haka. In july 1999 two pastors from the
town of Thantlang were arrested again for conducting Church council
meeting without permission from the army.
On 9 September 1999 United States Department of State, in accordance
with the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, released its
first Annual Report on Religious Freedom. The report provides
accurate documentation of the Burmese Army's systematic violation of
religious freedom in Burma. The United States State Department has
designated Burma, along with China, Iran, Iraq, and Sudan, as one of
five countries of particular concern for violations of religious
freedom.
Over 90 percent of Chins are Christians and religious persecution is
a major concern in Chin State.
____________________________________________________
ARNO NEWSLETTER MONTHLY: LAND CONFISCATED FROM THE ROHINGYAS TO BUILD
PAGODA AND MILITARY BASES
News and Analysis of the Arakan Rohingya National
Organisation, Arakan (Burma)
May, 2000
On 28 April 2000, a Major, the commander of the NaSaKa Area No. 5, in
collaboration with Aung Than Che and Saw Myint Aung, had confiscated
73 acres of land belonging to Maulvi Mohammed and Akthar Hussain,
both of them from the village of Auk Pruma (Kasarbil), a place about
12 miles north of Maungdaw town. The two collaborators are Buddhist
Rakhines of the village. Then Major ordered the Rohingya villagers
to 'contribute' for the building of a pagoda on the confiscated land.
He warned that if anybody refuses to provide money for the pagoda
would be seriously dealt with. For the purpose of funding, he has
divided the Rohingya families of the 12 village tracts of the Area
into three categories. The families in first category must pay an
amount of Kyats 5000, the second Kyats 4000 and third exempted from
payment. Major Kyaw Naing started collecting this so-called
contribution from 7 May 2000.
This is a continued process of the SPDC to change the face of the
Rohingya Muslim region in Arakan. In the township of Buthidaung, for
the purpose of demographic changes and military situation a total of
1,232 acres of Rohingya's land have been further confiscated making
the poor Rohingya villagers homeless, land-less and jobless. As a
result, during this rainy season, about 1070 families of those
uprooted people one about to flee to Bangladesh in the face of the
extremely difficult situation. The confiscated lands are: -Attwan
Ngatthay village 384 acres. Pale Taung village 320 acres. Dabru
Chaung village 528 acres.
____________________________________________________
SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS: SHAN STATE: CONTINUATION OF FORCED
LABOUR IN FULL SWING, AMID REJECTION OF ILO RESOLUTION
June 16, 2000
Amid total rejection of ILO resolution as " unfair, unjust and the
process flawed" by the Burmese foreign ministry yesterday, reports
coming in from Shan State indicated that the practice and
implementation of "forced labour" is still very much alive.
The SSA News reported that since 4th June 2000, the SPDC's 65th and
225th IBs from Mong Ton have been forcing the local people to work
for them without payment on the motor road construction between Mong
Kyawt and Mong Htar, in Mong Ton township. The forced labour is still
in full swing, as of 15th June 2000, without even a slightest sign of
completion or breaking the process. About 30 to 40 villagers have
been working on the construction of this motor road and those who
resisted are being arrested, fined and beaten up. Since most of the
villagers are farmers and it is the season to till the land and sow
the seeds, they are being hindered to go about with their routine
works. Besides, they also have to worry of the bad harvest, due to
the late planting caused by this unpaid forced labour.
The Junta's press release said that the ILO resolution was "most
regrettable that the resolution was adopted despite the goodwill and
cooperation demonstrated by Myanmar. It was taken in contravention of
the aims and objectives of the ILO and the measures in the resolution
far exceeded the authority of the ILO under its Constitution. It was
indeed a sad day for the ILO and a sadder day for the developing
countries that are the Member States of the Organization. Today
Myanmar is singled out for censure and a punitive action in an
arbitrary manner.Tomorrow it may be another developing country. Such
arbitrary actions could only impede the process of democratization
and would prolong rather than hasten the emergence of a democratic
society ".
___________________________ REGIONAL ___________________________
THE NATION: ASEAN SPLIT BY ILO MOVE ON FORCED LABOUR
June 16, 2000
Agencies
GENEVA - Thailand was reportedly the only Asean nation to abstain
when the International Labour Organisation (ILO) approved
unprecedented measures against Burma on Wednesday over the military
government's widespread use of forced labour.
ILO delegates agreed in a 257-41 vote, with 31 abstentions, to
invoke a special article in ILO rules against Burma that give the
country four months to prove its willingness to change - a move
fiercely opposed by Asian nations.
According to an informed source, Thailand was the only Asean
country not to vote against it.
The source said the Thai position would remain the same unless
Burma complies with the ILO's recommended ban on forced labour.
Before the vote, the Foreign Ministry instructed the Thai UN
representative in Geneva of Thailand's intention to abstain. As of
yesterday, no foreign ministry officials were available for
comment.
Burma has denounced the move as "most unfair, most unreasonable and
most unjust". The action was proposed by an ILO committed on
Friday, but was later opposed by Japan, China, Malaysia and India.
They and other Asian nations spoke out against the move on
Wednesday.
It was the first time the article had been used. In a compromise,
the resolution put off action until the ILO governing body meets in
November to review whether Burma is making serious efforts to stamp
out forced labour.
"The ILO and the world community have sent a loud and clear message
that we wil no longer tolerate horrific forms of forced labour. The
reported beatings, rapes and murders must stop," US Labour
Secretary Alexis herman said.
The resolution recommends that ILO members - governments, workers
and employers - "reviwe their links with (Burma) and take
appropriate measures to ensure (Burma) cannot take advantage of
such relations to perpetuate or extend the system of forced or
compulsory labour".
It slso refers the issue to a highlevel UN committed and agrees to
discuss it in special sessions at every future ILO conference until
Burma is shown to have stopped using forced labour. The ILO has no
mechanism to expel a member.
In Bangkok yesterday, Portuguese Ambassador Jose Tadeu Soares said
a long-delayed meeting between the European Union and Southeast
Asian nations would be held on June 26 in Lisbon with "no
conditions" placed on representatives from Burma's junta sitting a
the table.
The EU meeting wil pave the way for a ministerial meeting between
the two blocs to be held in Laos later in the year.
Soares described the decision to allow Burma to join the Joint
Asean-EU Consultative Committee as a "breakthrough" for cooperation
between the two groups.
Burma joined Asean in July 1997.
While members allowed Burma to join the consultative committee,
they have drawn up a comprehensive blacklist of some 200 of Burma's
military leaders, excluding diplomats, who are banned from
travelling to Europe.
The Portugese ambassador acknowledged a split within the EU about
how to handle Burma, deemed a pariah in the West for its poor human
rights record and widespread use of forced labour.
The Nation (June 16, 2000)
____________________________________________________
THE NATION: BURMESE REFUGEES AT SALWEEN CAMP WILL BE RELOCATED
June 16, 2000
MAE HONG SON - Thousands of Burmese refugees staying at a camp near
the Salween national park are to be relocated to another site as
part of efforts to stop Thai timber companies from exploiting their
cheap labour, provincial officials said yesterday.
The refugees, mostly ethnic Karen, will be relocated to Mae Lama
village in Mae Hong Son's Sobmoei district about five kilometres
from the original site, said Mae Sareang district chief Saowaraj
Yimrungreong.
The announcement came shortly after Saowaraj met the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees field officer, Stephen Sinclair-
Loutit.
The UNHCR has expressed concern for the refugees' safety, saying
there should be proper logistics so that aid workers can enter and
leave the premises in a tinely manner and that the refugees be
given an adequate supply of clean water, Saowaraj said.
About 100,000 Burmese refugees live in camps along the Thai-Burmese
border. Many have fled their homeland after fighting between rebel
armies and government troops.
____________________________________________________
AP: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH CRITICIZES THAILAND FOR EXPELLING KAREN
BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) _ The U.S.-based group Human Rights Watch
denounced the Thai government Friday for forcibly repatriating more
than 100 ethnic Karen refugees to Myanmar this week.
It said the Thai authorities expelled 116 refugees from Don Yang
refugee camp in the western Thai province of Kanchanaburi to
Myanmar's Mon state on Monday.
They were expelled after a provincial board established to process
refugee claims rejected their application to remain in the camp, the
human rights group said.
Many of the refugees had fled fighting between the Karen National
Union and the Myanmar army in 1997, but reported to the camp only
after border-wide registrations in 1998.
Their delay in reporting was crucial because Thai authorities only
allow entry to the camps to those deemed to be fleeing conflict.
``These narrow criteria fail to take into account all of the other
grave human rights abuses that cause refugees to flee Burma,
including forced relocation, arbitrary execution, forced labor, and
torture,'' said Human Rights Watch. Myanmar is also called Burma.
The Karen have been fighting Myanmar's central government for more
autonomy since the country became independent more than five decades
ago.
There are more than 100,000 Myanmar refugees, mostly Karen, in
refugee camps in Thailand. Provincial review boards like the one in
Kanchanaburi are reviewing the cases of 4,000 to 5,000 refugees.
Human Rights Watch said that many of the refugees marked for
expulsion from the Kanchanaburi camp Monday actually slipped out of
the camp beforehand, and the Thai government arbitrarily expelled
others who had not been screened.
Human Rights Watch called on the Thai government to suspend
deportations an unambiguous set of criteria consistent with
international standards is drawn up.
__________________ INTERNATIONAL __________________
THE NATION: FROM THE EDGE: ILO SETS STAGE FOR BURMA SHOWDOWN
June 17, 2000
DESPITE Burma's "tough fight to the very last minute", the
International Labour Organization (ILO) on Wednesday passed
unprecedented punitive measures that are tantamount to the imposition
of global sanctions on the Burmese junta for its practice of forced
and compulsory labour.
Although the regime is given a grace period of five months, its
Western critics and international labour unions are determined not to
let it off the hook when the ILO governing body meets on November 30
to review the matter.
Predictably, the Burmese delegation to the ILO categorically rejected
the punitive resolution, which was passed by a 257-41 vote with 31
abstentions. It called the action "most unfair, most unreasonable and
most unjust". Each of the 174 ILO country members has four votes, two
for the government and one each for employers and workers.
The measures adopted include a call on all ILO constituents -
governments, employers and workers - to review their relations with
Burma and for international organisations, including other UN
agencies, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, to
cease all activities which could abet the practice of forced labour.
The resolution also calls on the UN's Economic and Social Council or
the General Assembly to adopt recommendations directing international
agencies and UN member states to ensure that their involvement with
the Burmese junta does not include the practice of forced labour.
The voting on Wednesday was the culmination of a series of complaints
and ILO investigation in the late 1990s into the allegations
of "widespread and systematic" use of forced or compulsory labour in
Burma. An ILO technical team, which visited Burma on May 23-27,
confirmed the ILO Commission of Inquiry's 1998 findings that the
factual situation of forced or compulsory labour in Burma had
nevertheless remained unchanged.
The resolution had been fiercely opposed by not only Burma but also
its Asian allies - Japan and Asean countries - and other developing
countries, which feared the precedent of such punishment against
their own labour standards and practices. Indonesia, Malaysia, the
Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam went as far as proposing a counter-
draft calling for action to be deferred. The Asean document was
subsequently shot down.
As it turned out, Japan, China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri
Lanka joined Asean members and some Latin American countries -
Venezuela and Uruguay - and Zambia in Africa in voting against the
resolution. Surprisingly, Thailand abstained in the ballot.
Although international labour and human-rights activists viewed the
Thai stance as a split within the Asean grouping and a signal of
Thailand's growing discontent with its western neighbour,
Laxanachantorn Laohaphan, director-general of the Foreign Ministry's
International Organisation Affairs Department, told The Nation that
the Thai vote should not be taken out of context.
Asean, she said, has no tradition of bloc voting in any international
or UN forums, and Thailand has separated the two issues - Thai-
Burmese relations and allegations of forced labour in Burma. As the
next-door neighbour, the matter of forced labour is of Thailand's
concern as it could suffer from an influx of Burmese migrants, she
added.
"Each Asean member has different interests. Our voting is based on
our national interest. Asean, like the G-77 or NAM [Non-Alignment
Movement] does not have a bloc of voting that all members have to
conform to," said Laxanachantorn.
The senior Thai official believed Rangoon fully understood Thailand,
which was against tough sanctions against Burma and believed Burma
should be given more time to comply with ILO recommendations.
It remains to be seen how the Burmese generals in Rangoon will take
the tough punishment, which constitutes nothing other than a global
boycott of Burma.
According to one Asian diplomat in Geneva, the Burmese delegation had
informed Asean countries before the voting that Burma would consider
withdrawing from the ILO if it received sanctions despite its stated
commitment to cooperate with the ILO.
Japan in particular was very concerned with the Burmese threat and
the negative consequences as a result of Burma's further isolation.
In his statement after the voting, Japanese United Nations Ambassador
Koichi Haraguchi told the ILO conference that his government "frankly
was not happy with the resolution."
He asked Burma not to take "offence from the resolution" and urged
the regime to continue to cooperate with the ILO. Tokyo will
provide "good offices and other assistance" to help resolve the
issue, said the Japanese envoy.
Although exiled Burmese dissidents and Burma campaign activists are
satisfied with the ILO's further sanctions on the Burmese junta, the
Asian diplomat cautioned that Burma had in fact garnered more friends
in the vote.
"The analysis of the voting results shows that Burma was not so
isolated as previously thought," he said. Compared with last year's
voting on a similar resolution, this year the votes against Burma
decreased by 76 while the votes opposing the resolution increased by
14.
"Burma should be pleased that its support has expanded from last
year. It's not just Asean and China but the Asia-Pacific region," the
diplomat said.
But Western labour unions and Western countries, especially the
United States, which have harshly criticised the regime's bad human-
rights and labour records at various forums, including the ILO
conference, are convinced that by the end of the year some of the
penalties would be enacted.
Diplomatic battles for the real showdown in November have just begun,
and it will be a fierce fight by both opponents and proponents of
Burma sanctions.
BY Yindee Lertcharoenchok
____________________________________________________
REUTERS: BRITAIN URGES TOURISTS TO AVOID MYANMAR
LONDON, June 16 (Reuters) - Foreign Office Minister John Battle on
Friday urged British tourists to stay away from Myanmar, saying every
visitor helped fill the coffers of its military rulers.
Battle, citing what he called Myanmar's ``appalling record'' on
human rights and lack of democracy, said tourism was an important
source of revenue to a country which Britain has repeatedly sought to
isolate.
``Individuals can make a difference too. Burmese (Myanmar)
democratic leaders have made clear that they want tourists to stay
away from Burma,'' Battle said in a speech at Leeds University.
``We cannot ban individuals from travelling, but every British
tourist who goes there should know that they have to exchange US$300
on arrival,'' he said.
``Every one of these dollars will directly support the regime.
Anyone even thinking of going to Burma (Myanmar) should be under no
illusion as to what is happening there.''
Britain says human rights violations, particularly against ethnic
minorities, continues in Myanmar, including forced relocations,
killings and forced labour.
_______________ ECONOMY AND BUSINESS _______________
BUSINESS WEEK: LABOR STANDARDS WITH TEETH?
June 19, 2000
By Aaron Bernstein; EDITED BY ROBERT McNATT
For most of its 81 years, critics have derided the International
Labor Organization (ILO) as a toothless body that does little
besides publish reports that no one reads. Now the U.N. agency, run
by Director-General Juan Somavia, may be ready to grow a few baby
teeth. In mid-June, an ILO conference in Geneva will vote on whether
to sanction Myanmar (Burma) for forced-labor abuses under a never-
used clause in the ILO constitution.
If a majority of the ILO's 174 member countries agree, as seems
likely, the agency's charges of labor abuses could have new bite.
How so? The clause would allow the ILO to officially send the
charges to a wider audience of member governments and other U.N.
agencies.
It also would give governments legal cover to penalize the censured
country with trade or investment restrictions, says Thomas Niles, a
U.S. ILO delegate. This might temper further eruptions like those
last year in Seattle, where unions wanted the World Trade
Organization to enforce labor standards because of the ILO's
ineffectiveness.
_________________OPINION/EDITORIALS________________
THE NATION: EDITORIAL: THAILAND SHOWS ITS OWN MIND ON ILO VOTE
June 17, 2000
ON Tuesday, Thailand abstained from the crucial vote on measures
against Burma at the International Labour Organization (ILO) over the
regime's use of forced labour. It was a laudable decision that sent a
clear message to Rangoon what we have in mind.
The ILO's unprecedented measures call for diplomatic sanctions
against the junta if its practices have not improved by November 30.
In other words, Burma has five months to change the situation and
prove to the world forced labour does not exist inside the country.
The Burmese junta leaders have pledged to cooperate with the ILO
fully on this matter. Somehow, the ILO technical team, which visited
Burma recently, was not impressed and decided to press on further to
ensure Burma does not get away scot-free this time around.
Thailand's current position came after a careful consideration of
whether to vote in support of the sanctions or abstain. There was
strong public pressure for the Thai government to vote in support of
the measure along with 257 other ILO constituents. Thai
representatives from trade unions and employers were against Burma.
The Foreign Ministry debated the pros and cons of its decision, but
recognised it was likely to have far-reaching implications towards
Asean's overall position and Thailand's relations with Burma. After
some deliberation, the ministry concluded Thailand should stay away
from the voting so Burma can prove itself. If in the next five months
the use of forced labour has stopped, then Thailand will change its
position.
The ILO abstention also indicated support for Burma within the Asean
framework and international arena is no longer "automatic". In the
past, it has always been the Asean tradition for all members to vote
the same way, even if they disagreed with the decision. This kind of
hypocrisy is no longer tolerated. As a member of Asean, Thailand will
vote according to its principles. In the upcoming United Nations
General Assembly, we urge Thailand to follow this line of thinking
when the assembly deliberates later this year on the situation inside
Burma.
Thailand's position might not fit into the ordinary Asean pattern. It
should not. As the closest neighbour of Burma, Thailand has the
highest stake. The Burmese junta's tough political repression and
economic mismanagement only dive the people to flee the country.
Thailand is often their first choice of asylum.
The time has come for Asean to rethink its "unconditional" support of
Burma. Since its admission in July 1997, Burma has not done anything
to promote the unity of Asean. It has cited the Asean spirit as a
pretext to stop Asean from thinking aloud.
If Burma is serious about its membership in Asean, it must ban all
forms of forced labour and prove to the world it no longer practices
this horrible abuse. Thailand is willing to give its support if Burma
really follows its promises without wavering. Bangkok has no plans to
ostracise Burma - after all, it is our neighbour.
Thailand must be firm in its position. We do not have any ill-
intention to split Asean. But the group must not be held hostage by a
pariah member. As a nation, we must have the decency to follow our
own thinking, especially when democracy and civil society is so
strong. That's why the Thai public supports the decision, because it
reflects the democratic values of our country. Now it is our duty to
ensure the decision remains firm, unless Burma changes for the better
and becomes free of political oppression.
____________________________________________________
BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE: JOHN BATTLE'S SPEECH AT LEEDS UNIVERSITY,
LONDON
16 JUNE 2000
[Abridged]
In October 1998, a 12-year old girl in Karen state was taken with two
others to act as guides for regime troops. She was allegedly raped by
a major and managed to escape. But she was recaptured and raped again
and then shot dead. The major gave the girl's family compensation for
her death: one sack of rice, one measure of sugar, one tin of
condensed milk, and 100 kyat (about 20p).
This is just one of all too many shocking examples listed by Amnesty
International in a recent report about women in Burma.
Today I want to:
* set out for all to see the Burmese regime's appalling record on
human rights abuse and democracy;
* set out how the UK is taking the lead in putting international
pressure on the Burmese regime to change;
* undertake to keep up such pressure until the regime improves its
human rights record and enters into dialogue with democratic groups
in Burma.
To all appearances, Burma is among the most exotic destinations in
the world. It has so much to offer, from its age old pagodas and
colourful markets to its seductively tranquil pace of life. Burma has
a long history and tradition of Buddhist culture.
But the reality is that this country, inhabited by some of the
gentlest people in the world, has been governed since the sixties by
military regimes and that the current regime, in power since 1988, is
one of the most barbaric in the world.
When Burma gained her independence from Britain in 1948, few would
have believed that the country would slide to the point of economic
and social collapse that Burma has now reached under this brutal
military junta...
The situation on the ground in Burma, particularly for the ethnic
minorities there, is appalling. The NLD and other political groups
continue to work bravely for democracy, offering the hand of
partnership to those in authority. But that hand has so often been
pushed aside. Although no longer under house arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi
is left isolated, her principles and conviction her only defence
against the regime's thugs. The regime claims it respects
international human rights norms. Nothing could be further from the
truth.
...We are doing what we can to help these people through a variety of
channels. We are providing direct humanitarian assistance, working
closely with neighbouring countries on repatriation issues and
safeguarding the security of refugees.
British humanitarian assistance delivers vital relief to the region.
Our assistance to non?governmental organisations working on the
ground in Burma targets some of the poorest and most vulnerable
groups. Since 1996, we have provided more than one million pounds for
Burmese refugees in neighbouring countries.
This year alone we have allocated two hundred and seventy thousand
pounds to support the excellent work of the Burma Border Consortium
in providing humanitarian assistance to refugee camps in Thailand.
ECONOMIC SITUATION
Burma's economy is frankly a mess. Hardly surprising when the regime
devotes anywhere between 40 and 60 per cent of its budget to the
army.
Inflation in Burma is officially estimated at between 30 and 40 per
cent. But the basket used to produce this figure is unreliable. The
real figure is probably nearer 100 per cent.
For example, a 50 kilo bag of rice now costs between four and five
thousand Kyat, double the price of a year ago. The average family in
Burma spends about 80 per cent of its income on food.
There were budget deficits throughout the 1990s. Officially the
current deficit is about 3.5 per cent of GDP, although it's probably
greater because of off?budget, mainly military expenditure.
With a tax take of only 3 per cent, the lowest in the world, the
regime spends more than twice as much as it receives in tax. The
official exchange rate in Burma is one US dollar to six Burmese Kyat.
The market rate is one dollar to 330 Kyat.
Investment in Burma has dried up. New approvals in 1998/99 were only
5 per cent of those in the previous financial year. Major foreign
companies are pulling out. Toyota, and HSBC, are but two examples.
That's another vote of no confidence in the regime.
And even during the peak investment years of the early 1990s, all key
social welfare indicators worsened, suggesting that the investment
benefited only a very small elite in the country.
Burma's trade with all its key neighbours has declined rapidly in the
last two years. The country is in default with its outstanding loans
from both the World and Asian Development Banks.
It currently has some 270 billion yen in official debt to Japan, 130
billion of which is in arrears, representing a third of all non?
performing Japanese loans.
Before the Second World War, Burma was the world's largest exporter
of rice ? 3.3 million tonnes in 1938/39. In the early 1960s Burma
exported about one and a half million tonnes annually. Now Burma
exports less than 100,000 tonnes per year. The rice bowl of Asia can
scarcely feed its own people.
Britain has historically strong links with Burma. Which makes it all
the more difficult for us to stand by and watch the subjugation of a
nation by military despots who continue to ignore the people's
democratic choice. While that dreadful state of affairs remains, we
shall afford the regime no respite.
Robin Cook saw some of the suffering the Burmese people are enduring
when he visited a refugee camp near the Burma border in Thailand in
April. He said then that he could not forget the horrors he saw and
heard about.
The only comfort he could draw from the experience was that his harsh
criticism of the regime at the time drew a sharp reaction from them.
They were stung by his words. Which shows that our policy of
condemnation and pressure works. It reminds the regime that their
malignant incompetence is tracked by the wider world. And it gives
heart to Burma's downtrodden democrats. They can see that they are
not forgotten.
We shall continue to condemn the regime's dreadful human rights
record, and to press them to enter into substantive dialogue with
democratic groups, including ethnic minority leaders, to find a
political solution to the country's problems.
There will be no relaxation in the pressure we are mounting, the
measures we have taken and shall continue to take for as long as they
continue to hold out against political and economic reform.
Our policy recognises the need to sustain the Burmese opposition and
to resist the regime's efforts to wear down international resistance
to its undemocratic rule.
Through our Embassy in Rangoon we maintain very close contacts with
pro-democracy groups in Burma, including Aung San Suu Kyi and her NLD
party. We all value this important contact.
But it is not, as some have suggested, just about Aung San Suu Kyi.
Our policy rests upon the principle of the right of the Burmese
people to express a choice about who should govern them and how
governments are held accountable.
In failing to allow Aung San Suu Kyi and her NLD party to form a
government, the Burmese military regime are denying the people of
Burma those rights.
We are determined to keep up the pressure on Burma on every front,
bilaterally, regionally and multinationally, in whatever forum is
available.
Multilateral pressure is without doubt the most potent weapon at our
disposal. That is why Britain has been leading efforts to mobilise
the international community in a wide range of international bodies.
Burma's disgraceful human rights record is an affront to the United
Nations principles that it has undertaken to uphold.
In April, we again co-sponsored a strongly worded United Nations
Commission on Human Rights resolution, cataloguing the Burmese
regime's human rights violations. We did the same at the UN General
Assembly last November.
It is the responsibility of the Burmese government to respect their
international obligations, and to implement UN resolutions swiftly
and in full. We shall maintain the pressure to ensure that they do so.
Back in March the United Kingdom led the charge in condemning Burma
at the governing body of the International Labour Organisation. The
regime has consistently ignored the ILO's recommendations on stopping
forced labour, and that organisation's patience has snapped.
Two days ago, in an unprecedented move, ILO delegates voted to take
action to compel the Burmese regime to comply with ILO regulations on
forced labour.
This is the first time that such steps have been taken against a
member state in the history of the ILO, thus implicitly recognising
that Burma's behaviour in this respect is worse than any other labour
issue, anywhere, ever. International pressure does work.
Further evidence of this was seen in the regime's reaction to the
EU's tightened package of measures against Burma, announced in April
in a move spear-headed by the UK.
The EU now not only bans military exports, defence links,
non-humanitarian aid and high level bilateral visits, but has also
published a list of prominent regime measures for whom visas are
banned, and has frozen their funds in the EU.
We have taken unilateral measures too. We have withdrawn all
Government support for trade missions to Burma and actively
discourage British companies from doing business there. In March I
called in representatives of Premier Oil, the biggest British
investor in Burma, and told them we wanted them to withdraw from the
country as soon as lawfully possible. Our view is that a multi-
million pound investment in Burma's most important revenue generating
sector can only serve to prop up the military regime.
I was delighted to hear since then that two other major British
companies with a presence in Burma have reviewed their positions
there, with HSBC announcing their withdrawal and Standard Chartered
downgrading their operation in Burma.
Individuals can make a difference too. Burmese democratic leaders
have made clear that they want tourists to stay away from Burma. We
cannot ban individuals from going there ? unlike Burma, this is a
free country.
But every independent British tourist that does go there should know
that they have to exchange three hundred US dollars into Foreign
Exchange Certificates. Every one of these dollars will directly
support the regime, which is desperately short of foreign exchange.
Any tourist to Burma should only go with their eyes open to what is
happening there.
Not everyone agree with our policy on Burma, so the scope for further
international action is limited. For example, for trade sanctions to
be effective they have to be universal and we know that for now at
least, this is not achievable.
Some argue that because of this, we should introduce unilateral
sanctions. But experience has shown us that unilateral sanctions
don't work. And we are not in the business of empty gestures. We want
to take action that has a real effect.
Others would prefer us to move in the other direction, ease the
pressure and engage in dialogue with the regime. But the regime
refuses to engage.
They are in denial. They deny all human rights abuse allegations, and
yet refuse access to anyone wishing to investigate those allegations.
Judge Lallah, the United Nations Special envoy on human rights, has
never been allowed into Burma.
Mr De Soto, the UN's last Special envoy on Burma, got in only rarely.
I very much hope that Razali Ismail, the newly appointed Special
envoy, enjoys greater access. But the signs are not promising.
The Burmese have already delayed his first planned visit. He now
hopes to visit at the end of this month. Do not be surprised if we
see yet another postponement.
The World Bank, who accompanied Mr De Soto on his visit, did so
carrying an olive branch. Show signs of improvement on human rights,
they said, for example, release some political prisoners and allow
freedom of political expression, and in return you can start on the
road back towards developmental aid.
Nothing happened. Dialogue takes two, but the Burmese are simply not
prepared to engage. The Burmese do not talk to us, and until they do,
we shall remain firm. So where do we go from here?
Let the regime be in no doubt that we will not relax the pressure.
We will work unilaterally, regionally, multilaterally, through the
EU, the UN, through any and all appropriate fora, to drive home to
the Burmese regime that they will not be allowed to get away with it.
They are going to have to change. The winds of democratic reform are
sweeping the ASEAN region. Burma cannot remain immune.
We want an end to the human rights abuses, and a return to democracy.
Until those changes occur, Burma cannot be welcomed back into the
international fold. As long as the denial continues, so will the
isolation.
In the meantime, we as a Government, and as democratic people in
Britain, will continue to keep the spotlight on the situation in
Burma - underlining and challenging the human rights abuses, engaging
with our partners in the EU, the UN and the wider international
community to increase the pressure on the Burmese military to respect
democracy. Next Monday sees the birthday of Aung San Suu Kyi. Her
courageous lifelong struggle and endurance are supported throughout
the world. Three weeks ago was the tenth anniversary of the election
won by the National League for Democracy. They are still prevented
from taking office. These anniversaries will be remembered and
commemorated until there is justice and peace for all Burmese people,
and democracy is properly restored.
_____________________ OTHER ______________________
PD BURMA: CALENDAR OF EVENTS WITH REGARD TO
BURMA
May 30th- June 15th : 88th Session of the International Labour
Conference, Geneva
June 18th : Fundraising benefit at the Royal Court
Theatre, London
June 19th : Aung San Suu Kyi's birthday and Burmese
Women's Day
June 22-23rd : Burma Donor Meeting, Dublin
June 24th : Burma Solidarity Meeting, Dublin
July 7th : Commemoration of bombing of student union and
shooting in 1962
July 19th : Martyrs Day (Official)
July 24-25th : 33rd ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (AMM),
Bangkok
July 27th : 7th ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), Bangkok
July 28-29th : 33rd ASEAN Post Ministerial Conferences
(PMC), Bangkok
August 8th : 12th Anniversary of the 8-8-88 uprising
September 18th : Anniversary of SLORC Coup, 1988
September 24th : National League for Democracy formed
1988
October 26-28th : the 50th Congress of Liberal
International, Ottawa
October : 104th Inter-Parliamentary Conference, Jakarta
November 2-17th : 279th Session of the Governing Body and
its committees, Geneva
________________
The BurmaNet News is an Internet newspaper providing comprehensive
coverage of news and opinion on Burma (Myanmar).
For a subscription to Burma's only free daily newspaper, write to:
strider@xxxxxxx
You can also contact BurmaNet by phone or fax:
Voice mail or fax (US) +1(202) 318-1261
You will be prompted to press 1 for a voice message or 2 to send a
fax. If you do neither, a fax tone will begin automatically.
Fax (Japan) +81 (3) 4512-8143
________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How about a flat, no-fee long distance rate of 6.7¢ per min. -
or less? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you rates which
fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!
http://click.egroups.com/1/3820/6/_/713843/_/961256625/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
theburmanetnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx