[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

BurmaNet News: March 28, 2001



______________ THE BURMANET NEWS ______________
        An on-line newspaper covering Burma 
         March 28, 2001   Issue # 1765
______________ www.burmanet.org _______________

INSIDE BURMA _______
*Sydney Morning Herald: Talk of Political Transition Suggests 
Breakthrough Is Nearing
*Shan Herald Agency for News: Junta intelligence officer--Little 
breakthrough expected during April talks
*KNPP: Karenni villagers flee the Burmese junta's dry-season military 
operation
*Shan Herald Agency for News:  Shan traditional festival banned
*Karen Human Rights Group: Thaton District?SPDC Using Violence Against 
Villagers to Consolidate Control

REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL _______
*AFP: Disappointing government response to forced labour in Myanmar--ILO 

*ILO: Developments concerning the question of the observance by the 
Government
of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29)
*Bangkok Post: Reshuffle Looming to Tailor Personnel to Foreign Policy

ECONOMY/BUSINESS _______
*RCR Wireless News: Myanmar GSM Service Begins 

OPINION/EDITORIALS_______
*Bangkok Post: Burma to Test Thaksin's Resolve
*Myanmar Times : Unfounded Accusations Hurled at Myanmar

OTHER______
*Rakhine Conference in America


__________________ INSIDE BURMA ____________________



Sydney Morning Herald: Talk of Political Transition Suggests 
Breakthrough Is Nearing 


March 28, 2001

By Mark Baker

The head of the military regime in Burma has spoken publicly for the 
first time about plans for political transition, a fresh sign that 
secret talks are progressing on a return to civilian rule.

In a speech marking Burma's armed forces day, General Than Shwe also 
offered cautious praise for democracy, but said the country would need 
to move forward with caution to avoid instability.

While the general did not refer directly to the democracy leader Ms Aung 
San Suu Kyi or to her talks with senior military intelligence officers 
over the past six months, a government spokesman said: "It's going very 
well." 

There are growing expectations a more detailed announcement may be 
imminent after it was confirmed that a United Nations special envoy, Mr 
Razali Ismail - asked to postpone a visit to Rangoon earlier this month 
- was expected back in Burma within the next fortnight.

Observers said the remarks by General Than Shwe, on such an important 
day in the Burmese calendar, reinforced speculation that significant 
progress was being made towards solving the 10-year standoff between the 
regime and Ms Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy. "For the number 
one guy in the Government to use the words political transition in a 
major speech on an occasion like this is very significant," one 
Rangoon-based analyst said.

The Herald revealed earlier this month that Ms Suu Kyi had held at least 
12 meetings at her Rangoon residence with the powerful deputy chief of 
military intelligence, Major-General Kyaw Win, and that the general had 
told close associates they were discussing the framework for a 
transitional administration.

Sources said yesterday that Ms Suu Kyi, who won the 1991 Nobel Peace 
Prize, was still refusing to talk publicly about the progress of her 
talks with the regime. One said: "She remains totally tight-lipped about 
it all, and she's not even talking to her own people about what is going 
on."

Burma has been ruled by military regimes for almost 40 years, and Ms Suu 
Kyi has spent most of the past decade under house arrest since the 
generals refused to recognise her group's landslide victory in elections 
in 1990.

During his speech in Rangoon yesterday General Than Shwe praised the 
success of democratic countries in achieving economic development.



___________________________________________________





Shan Herald Agency for News: Junta intelligence officer--Little 
breakthrough expected during April talks

27 March 2001

A military intelligence officer remarked recently that he did not think 
the  upcoming regional level talks between Rangoon and Bangkok would 
amount to  much, according to a source from Tachilek.

The officer from MI-24 (Tachilek branch), whose name is withheld here to 
 protect the source, said on Friday (23 March), Given the fact that  Gen 
 Thein Sein will have to refer everything back to the top, I don't 
suppose  there'll be any significant decisions.

The Regional Border Committee (RBC) will meet on 2-4 April and 
co-chaired  by Maj- Gen Thein Sein, Commander, Triangle Region Command 
(Eastern Shan  State) and Lt-Gen Wattanachai Chaimuenwong, Commander, 
Third Regional Army  (northern Thailand) in Kengtung.

The gate on the Burmese side of the Friendship Bridge between Tachilek 
and  Maesai, Chiangrai, is still welded and Joint patrols by Burmese and 
Wa  troops west of Tachilek to prevent attacks by Shan State Army of 
Yawdserk  are being carried out each night, said the source.

Foodstuffs for Tachilek such as chicken, fruit and vegetables are being  
transported from Kengtung each day.


___________________________________________________



KNPP: Karenni villagers flee the Burmese junta's dry-season military 
operation

Destruction of villages, farms and hunting the Internally Displaced 
Persons (IDPs) is a crime against humanity



Contacts: Abel Tweed, Doh Say
Tel: 66 53 611 691
E-mail: ooreh@xxxxxxxxxx

March 23, 2001

Seventy-six Karenni villagers fled the junta's dry-season military 
operation and reached Thai border this evening. The villagers are 
originally from Daw Tamakyi, Dee Mawsoe Township, Karenni State. On Feb 
22, 2001, 105 Karenni villagers reached the Thai soil. The total number 
being 181 Karenni villagers from more than ten villages have reached in 
since the last month.

The Burmese junta started its annual dry-season military campaign 
against the Karenni Army (KA) and the Karenni villagers including those 
who have been hiding in the jungle since it carried out a forced 
relocation program in 1996. 

"We were forced to leave our village and hide-outs by the Burmese 
soldiers for Thailand," said Khu Sa Reh, 60, the head of Daw Sa village. 
" We were fleeing oppression, forced labour, and military operation by 
the Burmese soldiers," concluded Khu Sa Reh.

The fighting between the junta's troops and the KA is going on both on 
the border and deep inside Karenni State. There have been several 
clashes along the Karenni-Thai border between the junta's troops and the 
KA since the beginning of this year.

"Destruction of villages and farms, hunting the Internally Displaced 
Person (IDPs) is a crime against humanity," said Aung Than Lay, Prime 
Minister of the Karenni Government. " There will be more Karenni 
civilians on Thai soil if the junta does not stop its uncivilized and 
inhuman activities. 
The Karenni Government in exile calls for the International Community to 
stop the regime from its inhuman activities both in Karenni State and 
Burma. It also calls for the International Community to put more 
pressure on the regime to enter the tripartite dialogue to solve the 
problems which are related to ethnic issues and a move towards a 
democratic system. 


The Karenni Government was founded in 1946 and it has been leading the 
Karenni National Resistance Movement against successive military regimes 
of Burma since 1948.  


___________________________________________________



Shan Herald Agency for News:  Shan traditional festival banned


March 24, 2001

Reports coming from the north said military authorities at a northern  
border district had issued an order prohibiting the Shan celebration of 
the  Leun-hsi (Fourth Lunar Month or Tabaung in Burmese) two weeks ago. 

On 10 March, the district peace and development council of Muse, 
opposite  Ruili of Yunnan and 110 miles north of Lashio, made a 
proclamation banning  the customary celebration in the whole valley of  
Mao aka Shweli aka Ruili. 

In future, it was to be observed by the Shans with simpe temple visits 
and  alms-giving, according to the order.

The order was followed by intensive public relations by the local  
departments, namely, Nasaka (Border Control Unit), Administration, 
Police,  military Intelligence and drug agency exhorting the local 
populace to  attend the entertainments by the official mobile theatrical 
troupe. 
"It was to ensure that the people went only to the festivities organized 
by  junta officials," said a source. "In the past the local people had 
often  ignored the military-supported concerts."

The Leun-hsi, that falls on 8 March this year, is held throughout Shan  
State every year. It is regarded as a Poy Hpi-pang (Festival invited by 
the  gods).





___________________________________________________



Karen Human Rights Group: Thaton District?SPDC Using Violence Against 
Villagers to Consolidate Control 

[Abridged] 

March 20, 2001 / KHRG #2001-U2


In an effort to drive a wedge between the villagers in northeastern 
Thaton district and the resistance forces of the KNU/KNLA (Karen 
National Union / Karen National Liberation Army), the SPDC continues to 
intimidate villagers with violence, threats and military retaliation. 
Information sent by KHRG field researchers indicates that in Bilin 
township, east of the Bilin River spanning the border of Mon and Karen 
States, soldiers are using innocent villagers in a campaign to gain 
complete control over the villages and defeat KNLA opposition forces. 
They are capturing and torturing civilians, forcing them to work for the 
army and committing many kinds of abuses. Interviews by KHRG have 
documented stories of exploitation and violence in Bilin township, 
fuelled by ongoing SPDC attempts to gain both military and financial 
advantage. 

One SPDC strategy is to terrorise the villagers over any allegation of 
ties to the opposition army, no matter how spurious. A KHRG field 
researcher reports that in November 2000, SPDC troops abducted and 
tortured several villagers accused of having ties to the KNLA. The Light 
Infantry Battalion #1 soldiers entered Lah Soe Ko village in the 
nighttime, tied each of the accused villagers to a partner and brought 
them to Kyu Kee. The SPDC was acting on information given to them by the 
DKBA [Democratic Karen Buddhist Army - a Karen splinter group aligned 
with the SPDC] about which villagers were working with the KNU. Two men, 
Pa G--- and Pa K---, were tortured by the soldiers in an attempt to 
coerce them into revealing the whereabouts of Pa G---Æs father, a health 
worker with the KNU. Battalion Commander Myint Lwin pressed the blade of 
his knife to their skin, nearly drawing blood, and pounded their 
stomachs with a large pestle. At first the men were able to prevail in 
their attempts to protect Pa G---Æs father, but the CommanderÆs efforts 
soon proved unbearable and the villagers led the soldiers to the manÆs 
house. On arrival in Pa G---Æs fatherÆs village, the soldiers found only 
a one-legged villager, whom they captured and brought back to Dta Meh 
Kee village. The SPDC troops then burned down three village huts, 
destroying the belongings of three families. They also confiscated 
medical supplies and equipment. 

In another incident in November 2000, SPDC soldiers coerced three 
villagers into revealing the locations of KNLA personnel. They suspected 
that the three men, who had been captured to work as porters for the 
army, had information about KNLA operations and whereabouts. The SPDC 
tortured the villagers Pa M---, A--- and Saw L---. The Battalion #1 
soldiers bound the menÆs heads, beat them and poured gallons of water 
down their throats. The villagers were then forced to lead the troops 
through the jungle to a KNLA camp, where the SPDC shot at the KNLA 
soldiers. 

In their ongoing efforts to cut ties between the Bilin township 
villagers and the KNLA, the SPDC uses threats and extortion to achieve 
their goals. One example documented by KHRG was in Noh KÆNeh village. 
Light Infantry Battalion #1 demanded large sums of money from the 
villagers because they claimed a KNLA officer is married to one of the 
village women. The village had to pay 50,000 Kyat the first time and 
40,000 Kyat in a subsequent visit. If the villagers cannot come up with 
the money, the SPDC officers threaten to relocate their village to an 
area closer to an SPDC army camp. The Noh KÆNeh villagers call the 
battalion officer "Pa Set Daw", meaning "one who stabs people with his 
knife", because he is known to torture villagers by pressing his sharp 
knife blade against their skin to convince them to give him information. 
Such extortion is not just for strategic reasons; it appears that 
financial gain for the officers is an equally compelling motive on their 
part, because during torture money is frequently extorted from the 
villagers. 

The township is also home to many seemingly random acts of violence 
perpetrated by SPDC soldiers, including rape. One 18-year-old village 
girl named Naw B--- was raped in her home by the SPDC during the 
June-October 2000 rainy season. While commonly committed, villagers 
donÆt dare report incidents like this to officials due to their fears of 
retaliation. 

The SPDC use the Karen villagers in the region as tactical pawns in 
their war against the KNLA. With every SPDC casualty or setback, a price 
is exacted on the civilians. If a soldier steps on a landmine, the 
villagers pay. If there is fighting with the KNU, homes may be ransacked 
and burned. If any of the troops are wounded in battle, the village 
might be fined, threatened or even destroyed. One less violent example 
occurred recently in Htoh Kloh Hta village. After a DKBA soldier was 
wounded in the area, SPDC and DKBA troops visited the village and 
demanded 200,000 Kyat, a very large sum by villagersÆ standards. 
Although the villagers have scarcely the resources to feed their own 
families, they paid out of fear of the consequences if they refused.  

Reports continue to surface from the area about an SPDC conscripted 
militia group composed of local villagers. Tha Gka Hsa Pa 
("Anti-insurgency Group") units operate in PaÆan, Kyaikto and Thaton 
townships. According to Karen sources, this group may have begun with 
KNU/KNLA members who defected to the other side in the 1970s or 1980s. 
Many of its members are unarmed and function primarily to point out KNU 
sympathisers to SPDC and DKBA forces. They are meant to divide the Karen 
community as much as to protect the SPDC army and its interests. A 
villager interviewed by KHRG says that each village has to have four or 
five members in this militia. Karen villagers are lured onto this 
"security force" by SPDC offers that their families will be exempted 
from portering and other forms of forced labour, and the possibility of 
being issued a weapon (though most are not given weapons until they have 
been with the force for several years). The soldiers can then work on 
their fields in the day and perform their security duties at night. In 
July 2000, KNLA forces captured three Tha Gka Hsa Pa soldiers and took 
them to their camp. After having their weapons confiscated they were 
released, only to be jailed by the SPDC on their return. Over the years 
KHRG has also received reports from Thaton District and other parts of 
Karen State about an SPDC-run militia group called Pyitthu Sit 
("PeopleÆs Army"), but it is unclear what if any relationship exists 
between the Pyitthu Sit and the Tha Gka Hsa Pa. Pyitthu Sit recruits are 
taken from villages and are given rudimentary military training, 
outfitted with basic weapons and ordered to guard the village. The 
village usually has to meet training expenses and supply food to the 
soldiers. Their only real military use seems to be serving as occasional 
cannon fodder in attacks on the KNLA. The use of these militia forces 
serves as another strategy to turn Karen against Karen, and is 
reminiscent of the Nazi use of Jews to police themselves during wartime 
Germany and similar divisive tactics used by dictatorships worldwide. 

Villagers in Bilin township face great difficulties providing their 
families with enough food because of the actions of the SPDC army. They 
continue to grow their hillside rice crops, but whenever SPDC patrols 
come close, they flee into the jungle. The combination of working under 
this cloud of fear and being kept away from their work by forced labour 
projects allows them little time to properly maintain their crops. The 
amount and severity of forced labour tends to depend on each villageÆs 
distance from an SPDC army camp. But all villages have to send people on 
a regular basis to be unpaid army porters, workers or messengers and are 
forced to work making thatch roofing shingles, constructing camps or 
maintaining roads. This leaves them little time to work on their crops. 
Consequently the villagers, particularly the men, have to flee when 
troops visit the area. They live in fear of being captured and forced to 
work for the army. Many families have fled their villages entirely, 
seeking refuge in the surrounding jungle. Around 15 to 20 households 
have already done so from each of the villages of Baw Naw Po Kee, Ther 
Khaw Doh Kee, Ther Gkee Pu and Pleh Po Hta. Many villagers prefer this 
unpredictable life away from their villages and food sources to the 
constant threat posed by visits by the SPDC and DKBA troops.  

In order to minimise the use of villages as KNLA resources, the SPDC 
have sporadically used forced village relocation to consolidate the 
Karen in selected SPDC strongholds. This also provides the army with a 
large, easily accessible pool of forced labourers. This can be 
accomplished first by oral or written demands, and later by burning and 
destroying the villages, driving some villagers to relocation sites and 
others to escape into the jungle. In recent years, they have destroyed 
the villages of Htee Mu Kee, Nya Po Kee, Kwih Lay Pu, Wah Tho Klah, Ther 
Rer Kee and many others.  




___________________ REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL___________________
				


AFP: Disappointing government response to forced labour in Myanmar--ILO 

GENEVA, March 28 (AFP) - Government responses to International Labour 
Organisation (ILO) recommendations to abolish forced labour in Myanmar 
have been disappointing, the organisation said Wednesday. 

 In an unprecedented move last November, the ILO called on its members 
-- workers and employers' groups, and countries -- to review their ties 
with Myanmar and take steps to ensure their ties did not help continue 
or extend forced labour. 

 Lord Bill Brett, from ILO's executive council, said that "the primary 
responsibility lay on governments" who have taken no action. He also 
denounced the secret diplomacy that some have indulged in. 

 The ILO asked recently to visit Myanmar to give an objective evaluation 
of the regime's efforts to counter the problem. 

 The US view is that ILO's presence in Yangon would be useless because 
of concealment by the Burmese authorities. 

 "The offer of technical cooperation still stands," said ILO chief Juan 
Somavia. "It remains to be seen whether the ILO is following a positive 
direction or is heading for a dead-end," he added at ILO's annual 
meeting in June. 

 Somavia said Myanmar's minister of labour, General Tin Ngwe, had sent 
him a letter last month saying it would continue to take measures to 
ensure forced labour was illegal both "in law and in practice". 

 Denmark, speaking on behalf of the EU, supported ILO's move to check 
the situation at first hand. While Yangon had announced several measures 
to put an end to forced labour, the EU was alarmed by information that 
the practices continued, they added. 

 Japan hailed Myanmar's action but said results were not yet evident. 



___________________________________________________




ILO: Developments concerning the question of the observance by the 
Government
of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29)


INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GB.280/6(Add.1)
280th Session

Governing Body Geneva, March 2001



Addendum

1. Since document GB.280/6 was finalized, the Office has received a 
number  of additional communications from member States, national 
employers' and workers'  organizations, an international organization, 
and a non-governmental organization. To enable  the Governing Body to 
get as complete a picture as possible, these communications are  
summarized below.

2. The Government of Canada indicated that copies of the Conference  
resolution had been sent to Canadian provincial and territorial 
governments and to national  workers' and employers' organizations. The 
Government had also sent a letter to major  Canadian business 
associations informing them of the Conference resolution and  Canadian 
policies with respect to Myanmar. In 1988 Canada suspended diplomatic 
and commercial  relations with Myanmar, along with support for Canadian 
firms doing business in the  country, including export programmes and 
commercial promotion. Support for multilateral assistance through 
international financial institutions was also withdrawn,  and bilateral 
aid was suspended. In August 1997, the Canadian Government had announced 
selective economic measures against Myanmar, which remain in force. 
These include  withdrawal of trade preferences and the introduction of 
export controls that effectively  limit exports to those of a 
humanitarian nature. The Government also issued a statement  urging the 
Canadian business community to refrain from entering into further  
investment agreements or commercial ventures in Myanmar until 
improvements were evident.  

3. The Government of Japan communicated the following points via its  
Permanent Mission. The relationship between Japan and Myanmar did not 
contain any element that  contributed directly or indirectly to forced 
labour in Myanmar, nor did any development  assistance do so. Japan 
hoped that an early solution would be attained on the question of  
forced labour in Myanmar, and that a constructive dialogue towards that 
objective between  the Government of Myanmar and the ILO would start 
soon.

4. The Government of New Zealand indicated that it had recently reviewed 
 the country's bilateral relationship with Myanmar and no element of 
that relationship had  been identified that would perpetuate or extend 
the system of forced labour in Myanmar. The  Government intended to keep 
the relationship under review. It had forwarded copies of  the 
Conference resolution to the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions and the 
New Zealand  Employers' Federation.

5. The Government of Portugal indicated that its trade with Myanmar took 
 place within the framework of the WTO and the EU. It was difficult 
within the framework of  the WTO to take measures against another member 
State for violations of fundamental  worker rights. The EU had suspended 
Myanmar from its system of trade preferences because  of the forced 
labour situation. The EU continued to observe the situation in  Myanmar 
with concern, and would discuss the question of forced labour in Myanmar 
and the  Conference resolution at a meeting of the EU Council in March.

6. The Government of Belgium indicated that although its bilateral  
relations with Myanmar were extremely limited, it had invited ministers 
of departments having  relations with the country to examine measures 
that could be taken in support of the ILO  action and to prevent these 
relations being used to maintain the system of forced labour. The 
possibilities for economic sanctions were limited because bilateral 
trade  was minor, and also because trade policy was mainly handled at 
the EU level. In July last  year, the Government of Belgium had 
communicated to the president of an oil company  its strong reservations 
regarding the policy followed by that company, which pursued  its goals 
without taking account of the situation in Myanmar. For ethical reasons, 
 the Government had ended a contract for the supply of fuel with the 
same company. It had  also introduced an ethical clause preventing 
suppliers to the Belgian State from carrying  out activities in 
countries that were guilty of certain human rights violations, although 
the  introduction of this clause had yet to be approved by the European 
Commission. The  Government gave its assurances that during its next 
term as president of the EU, later this  year, the EU's position would 
be carefully examined in the light of the situation on the  ground in 
Myanmar.

7. The Government of Kuwait stated that it had no direct or indirect  
cooperation with the Government of Myanmar, and indicated that it had 
communicated the Conference resolution to its employers' and workers' 
organizations. The Government of  the Seychelles indicated that it was 
studying the situation and would revert in due course. 

8. The Dutch trade union federation Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging 
(FNV)  indicated that it had no relations with the regime in Myanmar. It 
had requested the Dutch Government to provide it with information on 
Dutch companies with trading  interests in Myanmar, on the total value 
of trade between the two countries, as well as  details of imports which 
may have been made with the use of forced labour. Further  action would 
be taken on the basis of an analysis of this information, as soon as it 
is  received. The federation had also requested the Dutch Government to 
develop concrete  proposals for a review of its own and/or EU relations 
with Myanmar on the occasion of the  next EU discussion round on these 
relations. It had asked the Dutch Government to  inform it of such 
proposals, with whom it would discuss them if appropriate. 

9. The Fiji Trades Union Congress indicated that it supported the ICFTU  
position, but did not have any further information to provide at this 
stage. 

10. The All Pakistan Federation of Trade Unions indicated that it had 
urged  the Government of Pakistan to implement the spirit of the 
Conference resolution, and had  circulated the resolution widely to the 
news media in order to inform public opinion about  the situation in 
Myanmar.

11. The Swedish Employers' Confederation indicated that the content and  
implications of the Conference resolution had been discussed at a 
meeting of the South-East  Asia advisory board of the International 
Council of Swedish Industry. The Confederation's  full membership of 
45,000 companies had been informed via its newsletter of its  support 
for the Conference resolution, and companies that had any commercial 
relations with Myanmar were asked to review these relations. The 
International Council of  Swedish Industry had communicated the content 
of the Conference resolution to relevant associations of companies.

12. The United Nations Industrial Development Organization indicated 
that  in reference to its activities in Myanmar it was not aware of any 
non-compliance with the  Conference resolution.

13. The non-governmental organization Images Asia, which had provided a  
representative to testify before the Commission of Inquiry at its formal 
hearing of  witnesses  and which had cooperated closely with the 
Commission's visit to the region in 1998,  transmitted a report dated 3 
March 2001 on forced labour in the Rakhine state of Myanmar. The  report 
referred to the situation in northern Rakhine state in December 2000. 
The report  indicated that orders to stop the use of forced labour had 
been transmitted by the  Government of Myanmar to the civilian 
authorities in the state, and village leaders had  been requested to 
organize mass public meetings to announce the change in policy. Such  
information had also been placed on official notice boards, and it had 
been declared that  neither civilian nor military authorities were 
entitled to demand compulsory labour, and that in  case of 
non-compliance, complaints should be filed with the Court, which would 
take appropriate  action. The report claimed, however, that the Myanmar 
military, especially local battalions, were  showing no willingness to 
implement these instructions. The military was continuing to requisition 
 labour under threat of "dire consequences". As a result, while there 
had been a temporary  reduction in labour demands in some areas, this 
was only slight, and there were allegations that it had  been 
accompanied by an increase in extortion and arbitrary taxation.

Geneva, 22 March 2001.



___________________________________________________





Bangkok Post: Reshuffle Looming to Tailor Personnel to Foreign Policy

March 27, 2001


Berlin posting likely for soft-line critic


Achara Ashayagachat 


Cabinet is likely to endorse a major Foreign Ministry reshuffle to ease 
the way for the government's policies, ministry sources said. 

Surapong Jayanama, director general of the East Asian Affairs 
department, is expected to become ambassador to Germany, replacing Kasit 
Piromya, who will become an adviser to Prime Minister Thaksin 
Shinawatra. 

Mr Surapong was critical of Thai Rak Thai's "soft policy" towards Burma 
and strongly advocated the closure of borders in retaliation of Burmese 
violations of Thai sovereignty. 

The hardliner will be replaced by Krit Garnjana-goonchorn, director 
general of Department of Treaties and Legal Affairs, who is known for 
his gentle approach and strong principles. 

Mr Krit, secretary to former premier Prem Tinsulanond, is expected to 
concentrate on dealing with border problems with regional neighbours. 

The lawyer will be replaced by Thana Duangratana, ambassador attached to 
the ministry and acting chief of the minister's office.  

Mr Thana is a former deputy director general of the treaty and legal 
affairs department and former minister at the Thai embassy in France. 

Rathakit Manathat, deputy ministry spokesman, will replace Mr Thana as 
chief of the minister's office.  

Coming just a month after Surakiart Sathiarathai's appointment as 
Foreign Minister, the reshuffle was a surprise to officials who expected 
a "mini-reshuffle" after the departure of Kobsak Chutikul, director 
general of the economics department. 
Spokesman Pradap Pibulsonggram will take over Mr Kobsak's job and be 
replaced by Norachit Singhasenee, ambassador to the ministry. He was 
chief of the minister's office under former foreign minister Surin 
Pitsuwan. 






_______________ ECONOMY AND BUSINESS _______________
 


RCR Wireless News: Myanmar GSM Service Begins 

March 23, 2001



 
  NEW DELHI, IndiaùGSM service has been launched in the major cities of 
Myanmar, after many delays. Last year, the military regime licensed 
Sky-Link Communications of the Virgin Islands to set up a GSM network 
supporting 135,000 lines.    The government announced in March last year 
that it intended to launch a GSM network in the country, starting in 
Rangoon and Mandalay in two months, with a further six towns to be 
covered by the end of 2000. But the service was delayed for various 
reasons. 

  Reports reaching here said the capacity available is 70,000 lines and 
30,000 lines respectively for Rangoon and Mandalayùtwo major cities of 
Myanmar. Other towns that will have access to GSM include Myitkyina, 
Moulmein, Bhamo, Taunggyi, Sittwe and Prome.  

  A GSM phone in Myanmar officially costs about US$1,000.  



_______________OPINION/EDITORIALS_________________



Bangkok Post: Burma to Test Thaksin's Resolve

March 28, 2001

Knajana Spindler


There's a popular joke doing the rounds of Rangoon's goons these days. 
"If you throw a stone into Thailand you will hit a drug dealer." Of 
course, the Burmese military junta is not the only beneficiary from the 
tide of drug money pouring across the border from the sale of 600-700 
million ya ba tablets a year in Thailand. A significant chunk of that 
money comes back into Thailand into the hands of big business. Cement, 
petrol, pick-up trucks, luxury consumer goods-all the suppliers of these 
types of goods benefit from the huge fountain of drug money piling up 
across the border, fed, as Prime Minister Thaksin so eloquently put it 
recently, "by the tears of the Thai people".

The prime minister says he's determined to solve this scourge, ranked by 
most observers as Thailand's number one national security problem. But 
while one doesn't doubt Mr Thaksin's sincerity, there is a huge policy 
disconnect between his desire to solve the problem and the policy 
options being promoted by his defence and foreign ministers.

The policy disconnect appears to operate at several levels. For a start, 
both the minister of defence and the minister of foreign affairs share a 
common "let's promote business" policy, combined with the familiar 
attractions of a personal diplomatic style.

This is the first critical issue Prime Minister Thaksin must address. 
Following the elevation of a professional soldier, Gen Surayud 
Chulanont, to the position of army commander-in-chief, the Thai military 
has progressively withdrawn from interference in matters of foreign 
policy, preferring to leave them to their rightful authors, the Ministry 
of Foreign Affairs. This withdrawal was welcomed by former prime 
minister Chuan Leekpai's foreign affairs team, who succeeded in building 
a reputation of leadership within Asean for a more activist foreign 
policy that tried to address in a more realistic manner the policy 
tensions within Asean, rather than ignoring them as had been the 
tradition.

So who is in control of Thailand's overall relationship with Burma? 
Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai will be meeting his Burmese 
deputy counterpart in Chile later this week and will be in Rangoon at 
the end of April for an Asean foreign ministries informal "retreat", the 
latter being the operative word. At the same time, both Defence Minister 
Gen Chavalit Yongchaiyudh and Mr Thaksin have made various noises about 
visiting Rangoon.

Mr Surakiart expects to talk about fisheries and border trade and will 
reiterate the principle of Thailand's bilateral relations. Fresh from a 
visit to China, Mr Surakiart will also want to give some real life to 
China's apparent agreement to enter into a trilateral agreement with 
Burma and Thailand on drug suppression.

But who is kidding who? The Burmese economy is in terrible shape and 
apparently the junta is highly dependent on and attracted by the drug 
money. Moreover, nobody should be mislead by the so-called dialogue 
taking place in Rangoon between the junta and the democrats. According 
to Burma expert Bertil Lintner of the Far Eastern Economic Review: "The 
word 'dialogue' doesn't exist in the Burmese dictionary. They don't know 
what it means."So where does this leave the hard-pressed Thai military? 
Should it follow Gen Chavalit's facile instructions to "just turn up and 
smile" at next week's critical Regional Border Committee meeting in 
Kengtung, the first such meeting for two years? Should it follow Gen 
Chavalit's instructions to open all border crossings, which will please 
big business but also facilitate drug trafficking?The Thai military is 
deeply concerned. It sees no sincerity of purpose behind Burmese words 
and actually favours sealing all borders with Burma and imposing martial 
law in border areas. Big business or national security? What's it to be, 
Mr Prime Minister?

Kanjana Spindler is Assistant Editor, Editorial Pages, Bangkok Post





___________________________________________________




Myanmar Times : Unfounded Accusations Hurled at Myanmar

[BurmaNet adds?The Myanmar Times maintains that it is not owned by the 
regime but credible news reports indicate it reflects or promulgates the 
views of Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt.]

The Bangkok Post in its 8 March 2001 issue expressed in its Opinion & 
Analysis section that: 

Commander of the Third Army Lt. Gen. Wattanachai Chaimen-wong could find 
himself transferred in a special mid-year round of military postings and 
transfersö and that This is the follow up to the recent visit to Myanmar 
of Gen. Pat Akanibutr, Deputy to Defence Minister Gen. Chavalit 
Yongchiyndh and that Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt in a private  meeting with Gen 
Pat Akanibutr expressed disapproval of Lt-Gen Wattanchai.

Furthermore, The Defence Minister?s aides are said to be considering 
whether the meeting and discussions of the Joint Regional Border 
Committee would proceed smoothly if Thailand were to be represented by 
Lt-Gen Wattamachai as head and are contemplating whether it would not be 
prudent to replace him with another.The Bangkok Post and other 
rumour-mongers are certainly running amok with unfounded accusations. 
One report says that the bomb sabotage of the Thai Airways (737-400) 
flight at Don Muang Airport last Saturday was certain to be related to 
the fact that Myanmar military forces were hard hit in skirmishes at the 
Myanmar-Thai border last month. 

It also said that Commander of the Third Thai Army Lt-Gen Wattanachai 
and some senior military officers are ready to wager large sums of money 
that Myanmar secret agents in Thailand were surely involved in the 
bombing of the Thai Airways passenger plane.As a matter of fact, Gen. 
Pat Akinibutr came to Yangon to attend the funeral of Secretary-2 Lt-Gen 
Tin Oo and a meeting with Secretary-1 Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt. To discuss the 
case of Gen.Wattanachai was not on his itinerary. The newly-elected 
Government headed by Prime Minister Thaksin has now assumed power in 
Thailand and General Chavalit Yongchaiyudh has been assigned the cabinet 
post of Minister of Defence. And it is the new Defence Minister?s 
prerogative to reorganise the Thai Military Forces, order new postings 
and transfer as he sees fit. But those harbouring ill will against our 
country have deliberately tried to confuse the issues and exacerbate the 
situation by linking the moves made by the Defence Minister with the 
sugges! ted meeting of the Joint Border Regional Committee.

With regard to the blow-up of the Thai Airways passenger plane blame was 
laid on the Wa armed group, the United Wa State Army (USWA). But now 
they have changed their tune and claim that it was the work of Myanmar 
secret agents in Thailand wreaking vengeance for losses suffered by 
Myanmar forces in border skirmishes.This is a case of ôpost hoc ergo 
propter hocö û a kind of irrational thinking where something that occurs 
before a certain event is taken to be the cause of that event, 
irrespective of time and place. No person in his right senses would give 
credit to such a wild act of mud slinging.An official investigation was 
made and more than 50 airline and airport staff were questioned. The 
resulting report said that according to a reliable source, there is a 
possibility that the bombing may have been ôaimed at discrediting the 
new director of the Thai Airways Cargo Department and the airline?s 
president. 
The Thai Police stated that: the attack could have been sparked by last 
month?s management reshuffle of eight vice-presidents which angered many 
of the managers. Thai Police General Sant in his report to Defence 
Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Chavalit Yongchaiyudh said that 
conflict between Thai Airways and the Airports Authority was the most 
likely motive.This was reported on the front page of the Bangkok Post. 
Yet in the Opinion & Analysis section of the inner pages, the 
correspondent who wrote it went out of his way to make bricks out of hay 
to further incite General Wattanachai, the general in command of the 
border areas, by claiming that without a doubt, the bombing must have 
been the work of Myanma secret agents.We must therefore be aware that 
there are bound to be some ulterior motives behind these blatant lies 
and improbable scenario.  

We are left with very little doubt that the Thai newspapers with their 
sly innuendoes, exaggerated reports and gross untruths are attempting to 
increase tensions between the two countries or to even totally disrupt 
them. We would do well to think about who is really instigating the 
mercenary editors, reporters and correspondents of Thai newspapers such 
as the Bangkok Post and the Nation.We also need to take heed of other 
media organizations and news agencies that are intent on creating 
misunderstanding between the two countries. To warn the people of this, 
I have therefore highlighted the fact that the Bangkok Post is in the 
same category as the VOA, BBC, RFA and DVB, in fabricating news and 
broadcasting rumours to suit their own purposes. In Thailand some 
persons in authority, to serve their own interests and gain recognition, 
have time and again made false allegations against Myanmar. This is 
certainly not the first time.  

False reports were made to the effect that:

On 30 December 2000, Myanmar soldiers killed 6 villagers from Suan Peng 
Village, which lies 15 kilometres west of Bangkok. Later a revised 
report was made that these villagers had died at the hands of KNU 
insurgents active in the area.öThe Wa Armed Group in a bid to 
assassinate Prime Minister Thaksin was responsible for the bombing of  
the Thai Airways jet liner. And again that it was the work of Myanmar 
agents in Thailand.öIt makes one wonder whether flinging unfair and 
unfounded accusations left, right and center is an ingrained habit of 
some Thai officials. Very soon, they might begin to say something 
far-fetched such as that the collapse of the Thai economy was due to 
Myanmar machinations and not to the Asian currency crisis. 


"The Myanmar Times" Vol.3 No.55, 


______________________OTHER______________________





Rakhine Conference in America 

[Abridged]

March 19, 2001

On March 17, 2001 with extensive
discussion, 21representatives from all over the United
States, Canada, and Sweden has decided the
Arakan-Rakhine conference will be held in New York
City, New York State, on July 7 and 8, 2001
(tentatively). 

The conference is designed to build friendships and
mutual trust among Rakhine whereas invited scholars,
experts, activists, and individuals can facilitate
broader ideas and compressive provision for Rakhine
national interests, media networking, and information
sharing. Importantly, the conference is to give wider
opportunities to explore higher educational accesses
and financial access in grants and aids for Rakhine
refugees in India, Bangladesh, and Thailand as well as
for Rakhine organizations. 

In addition, the substantial goals of this conference
is to provide greater arrangement to create a
subcommittee to conduct an international Rakhine
conference cooperating with other organizations and
individuals that enable to execute national interests
and politics in democracy and human rights. Moreover,
making sponsors for Rakhine refugees in India to come
to the US and Canada is also one of the priorities to
carry out. 


For more information, contact: 
nyinyilwin8@xxxxxxxxx
e-mailakoo@xxxxxxxxx
 m_aung@xxxxxxxxxxx
 


Communication and Information Subcommittee (USA)






________________


The BurmaNet News is an Internet newspaper providing comprehensive 
coverage of news and opinion on Burma  (Myanmar) from around the world.  
If you see something on Burma, you can bring it to our attention by 
emailing it to strider@xxxxxxx

To automatically subscribe to Burma's only free daily newspaper in 
English, send an email to:
burmanet-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to The BurmaNet News in Burmese, send an email to:

burmanetburmese-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


You can also contact BurmaNet by phone or fax:

Voice mail or fax (US) +1(202) 318-1261
You will be prompted to press 1 for a voice message or 2 to send a fax.  
If you do neither, a fax tone will begin automatically.

Fax (Japan) +81 (3) 4512-8143


________________


Burma News Summaries available by email or the web

There are three Burma news digest services available via either email or 
the web.

Burma News Update
Frequency: Biweekly
Availability: By fax or the web.
Viewable online at http://www.soros.org/burma/burmanewsupdate/index.html
Cost: Free
Published by: Open Society Institute, Burma Project

The Burma Courier 
Frequency: Weekly 
Availability: E-mail, fax or post.  To subscribe or unsubscribe by email 
celsus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Viewable on line at: http://www.egroups.com/group/BurmaCourier
Cost: Free
Note: News sources are cited at the beginning of an article. 
Interpretive comments and background
details are often added.

Burma Today
Frequency: Weekly
Availability: E-mail
Viewable online at http://www.worldviewrights.org/pdburma/today.html
To subscribe, write to pdburma@xxxxxxxxx
Cost: Free
Published by: PD Burma (The International Network of Political Leaders 
Promoting Democracy in Burma)




________________

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less. 
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01