Description:
"For those of us interested in the spread and consolidation of
democracy, whether as policy makers, human rights activists, political
analysts, or democratic theorists, there is a greater need now than
ever before to reconsider the potential risks and benefits of
federalism.
The great risk is that federal arrangements can offer opportunities
for non-democratic ethnic nationalists to mobilize their resources.
This risk is especially grave when elections are introduced in the
sub-units of a formerly non-democratic federal polity—as they were
in the USSR and the former Yugoslavia—prior to democratic
countrywide elections and in the absence of democratic countrywide
parties.1 Of the nine states that once made up communist Europe,
six were unitary and three were federal. The six unitary states are
now five states (East Germany has reunited with the Federal
Republic), while the three federal states — Yugoslavia, the USSR,
and Czechoslovakia — are now 22 independent states. Most of postcommunist
Europe?s ethnocracies and ethnic bloodshed has occurred
within these post-federal states.
Yet in spite of these potential problems, federal rather than unitary
is the form most often associated with multinational democracies.
Federal states are also associated with large populations, extensive
territories, and democracies with territorially based linguistic
fragmentation. In fact, every single long-standing democracy in a
territorially based multilingual and multinational polity is a federal
state.2
Although there are many multinational polities in the world, few of
them are democracies. Those multinational democracies that do
exist, however (Canada, Belgium, Spain and India), are all federal.
Although all these democracies have had problems managing their
multinational polities (and even multicultural Switzerland had the
Sonderbund War, the secession of the Catholic cantons in 1848),
they remain reasonably stable. By contrast, Sri Lanka, a territorially
based multilingual and multinational unitary state that feared the
?slippery slope? of federalism, could not cope with its ethnic divisions
and plunged headlong into a bloody civil war that has lasted more
than 15 years..."
Source/publisher:
The Burma Fund (Technical Advisory Network of Burma, WP 02/02)
Date of Publication:
2002-00-00
Date of entry:
2007-06-10
Grouping:
- Individual Documents
Category:
Language:
English, Burmese
Local URL:
Format:
pdf
Size:
228.11 KB