Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries)
Individual Documents
Description:
"With the upper and lower houses unable to reconcile differences over draft amendments to the Peaceful Assembly and Procession Law, the Amyotha Hluttaw Speaker announced last week that lawmakers would hash out their disagreements in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.
Eight points of disagreement between the two chambers remain, under sections 4(f), 12, 14(a) and 25, as well as four sub-clauses of Section 10.
The upper house Speaker said the move to debate the contended articles in the Union parliament, announced on September 15, was at the suggestion of lawmaker U Aung Kyi Nyunt (NLD; Magwe 4), a member of the Amyotha Hluttaw Bill Committee.
The MP said the main point of contention was over a clause supported by the Amyotha Hluttaw, which parliamentarians in the lower chamber stripped out, that would make it illegal to incentivise individuals to join a protest.
?The Amyotha Hluttaw approved the clause that [prohibits] any powerful organisations or people from ordering people to protest by giving them money and [prohibiting] people from accepting that money also. The Pyithu Hluttaw abrogated that clause,” he said..."
Swan Ye Htut
Source/publisher:
"Myanmar Times"
Date of publication:
2016-09-19
Date of entry/update:
2016-09-20
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
Executive Summary:
"ARTICLE 19 welcomes the newly elected National League for Democracy?s (NLD) initiative to reform protest laws in Myanmar. The speed with which the proposed Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Bill (the Bill) was put before the Parliament is a welcome sign of the government?s intention to reform laws that have demonstrably been used to restrict the right to freedom of expression and the right to assembly.
At the same time, we encourage the government to pause and consult widely with civil society on the Bill before proceeding further in the Parliament. In particular, the consultation should assess whether and how provisions in the Bill could be used intentionally or otherwise to continue past repression of protesters. ARTICLE 19 is particularly concerned that the current Bill:
• Includes provisions that are not necessary in a democracy;
• Includes provisions that are vaguely written and could be used arbitrarily to restrict freedom of expression; and
• Includes criminalisation and prison sentences for peaceful protest.
The Bill will be a step forward from the current Right to Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law, as amended in 2014. However, it continues to include criminalisation and vague provisions that ARTICLE 19 raised concerns about in 2014. and which have been used to criminalise and imprison hundreds of peaceful protesters over the past two years.
ARTICLE 19 recommends that the Government:
• Pause the parliamentary process and consult with civil society broadly, with the aim of returning a revised bill. This consultation should in particular consider the potential ramifications of the Bill?s provisions, testing their need in a democracy and identifying whether they can be used arbitrarily. Consultations should be guided by the ?joint practical recommendations for the management of assembles”, issued by the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association and the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions;1
• Consider how criminal actions potentially committed during protests, such as destruction of property or violence, could be better dealt with by using criminal laws of general application, rather than specific laws for protesters only. Based on this considerations, return a revised bill;
• Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which the Myanmar Government agreed in recommendations accepted during the November 2015 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council. While ratifying, begin to engage more thoroughly with the international human rights system, for example by inviting the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association to Myanmar to support in the development of this Bill.
In the following analysis, ARTICLE 19 highlights the priority concerns regarding the Bill, with recommendations based upon international human rights law and standards."
Source/publisher:
Article 19
Date of publication:
2016-05-16
Date of entry/update:
2016-06-29
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf pdf
Size:
193.94 KB 1.47 MB
more
Description:
Summary:
"While the country is more open than
before, the people?s rights are being
neglected. They can arrest you at any time under these laws. There is no
guarantee.
?Pang Long, attorney, Rangoon, January 2016
The past five years have been a time of liberalization and change in Burma. The abolition
of prior censorship and a loosening of licensing requirements has led to a vibrant press,
and the shift from formal military rule has emboldened civil society.
The change has not been without conflict, however, and, under President Thein Sein, those
who embraced the new freedoms to vocally criticize the government or military too often
found themselves arrested and in prison. The
backlash against critics was facilitated by a
range of overly broad and vaguely worded laws
that violate internationally protected rights
to expression and peaceful assembly, some dating from the British colonial era, some
enacted under successive military juntas, and others the products of reform efforts, or
ostensible reform efforts, by the Thein Sein government.
This report examines how Burmese governments have used and abused these laws and
the ways in which the laws themselves fall far short of international standards. It sets forth
a series of concrete recommendations to the new Burmese government, led by Aung San
Suu Kyi?s National League for Democracy (NLD), aimed at dismantling the inherited legal
infrastructure of repression..."
Source/publisher:
Human Rights Watch
Date of publication:
2016-06-29
Date of entry/update:
2016-06-29
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Burma/Myanmar laws which have been used in political cases and are in need of amendment (commentary), Human Rights Watch Reports on Burma/Myanmar, Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to opinion and expression (commentary), Freedom of opinion and expression: - the situation in Burma/Myanmar - reports, analyses, recommendations, Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries)
Language:
English, Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Local URL:
more
Description:
" Burma?s parliament should amend a proposed law on public protest to better protect rights to peaceful assembly and free expression, Human Rights Watch said today. The Peaceful Processions and Peaceful Assembly Act improves upon existing Burmese law, but retains criminal penalties and contains overly broad and vague restrictions on speech contrary to international standards..."
Source/publisher:
Human Rights Watch
Date of publication:
2016-05-27
Date of entry/update:
2016-05-28
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
"...It is the right of the students who are now under detention to seek and obtain bail. Even if the government may claim that those under detention are not students, these individuals were only participating in peaceful protest, which is the right of every Burmese citizen. So, whether those in detention now are students or not, it is the responsibly of the court to recognise their constitutional rights and, at the very least, release them on bail.
Any further detention of the students will curtail their prospect of further education, for which they have worked hard; it will destroy their future. Perhaps, this is what the government wishes for those that it has kept under detention.
The AHRC strongly condemns the government actions and calls upon the government of Burma to release the students unconditionally. The AHRC also calls upon the international community to work closely with the government of Burma and ensure that the students are released. The AHRC further urges the governments to withdraw sections of the National Education Law against which the students have been protesting."
Source/publisher:
Asia Human Rights Commission
Date of publication:
2015-04-08
Date of entry/update:
2015-04-24
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
"The Asian Human Rights Commission has documented that an increasing number of peaceful protesters are being arrested and jailed under the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Act. Citing the maintenance of peace and tranquility in the country, and ensuring the upcoming 2015 election remain peaceful, authorities, especially Administrative Officers, have filed cases against numerous peaceful protesters under this Act.
The Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Act was enacted in December 2011 and the regulations relating to the law passed in July 2012. In a statement issued on 24 September 2013, the AHRC had noted:
?? contrary to its title and as proven in practices over the last two years, far from enabling the exercise of rights to assemble and demonstrate the law does precisely the opposite by requiring people to request permission for events from local police stations, who can arbitrarily approve or decline such assemblies as they see fit. The section is quickly becoming notorious as more and more people who are declined permits to rally-without rhyme or reason-and then do so nonetheless are prosecuted.”
In June 2014 the law was amended; however, no regulations to the amended law have been passed to date. This has led to another layer of difficulty for peaceful protesters seeking to exercise their constitutional rights, and given the authorities greater possibilities for misuse..."
Source/publisher:
Asian Human Rights Commission
Date of publication:
2015-04-21
Date of entry/update:
2015-04-24
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
"Students and their supporters detained in Tharawaddy Prison continue to be denied access to lawyers. In addition, the authorities have refused medical assistance for the detainees that are injured. Thus, the government continues its persecution of the Burmese students who have taken a stand against the government?s plan with respect to education.
The background to this is that students from all over Burma have denounced and demanded amendment to the National Education Law, which was passed last year on 30 September 2014. Burmese students boycotted the law and protested for four days in Yangon on 14 November 2014. They gave 60 days to the government to reconsider the law and respond to their request. However, when the government provided no response, students commenced a protest march from Mandalay to Yangon, a distance of 359 miles.
This student protest march was stopped in Letpadan Township on 3 March 2015, and it is here that the police brutally cracked down on the students. On 10 March, students and their supporters were subjected to police violence; the police used unjustified force; students and their supporters were beaten with batons and arrested. Officially, 127 individuals were arrested the same day and placed in Tharawaddy Prison; of these, 27 were released from the Prison without charge on 12 and 13 March. Two days later, some of the detainees were brought before the court to get remand, but none were allowed to meet family or lawyers..."
Source/publisher:
Amyotha Hluttaw via "The Global New Light of Myanmar"
Date of publication:
2015-03-24
Date of entry/update:
2015-04-24
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
SUMMARY:
"Since President
Thein
Sein
came
to
power
in
2011,
political
and
economic
reforms
in
Myanmar
have
led
to
greater
freedoms
and
unprecedented
optimism
for
the
country?s
future.
However,
in
communities
throughout
Myanmar,
authorities
continue
to
apply
repressive
laws
and
employ
practices
common
under
previous
military
regimes.
The
Ward or Village Tract Administration Law
requires
all
residents
of
Myanmar—urban
and
rural,
Burman
Buddhists
and
minorities,
rich
and
poor—to
report
the
identity
of
overnight
houseguests
to
government
officials
serving
as
ward
or
village
tract
administrators.
In
effect,
residents
need
permission
from
the
state
to
host
overnight
guests—and
authorities
are
known
to
deny
guest
registration
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
Myanmar
authorities
ensure
compliance
with
the
guest
registration
requirement
by
conducting
periodic
household
inspections.
The
Ward or Village Tract Administration Law
empowers
officials
to
inspect
?the
places
needed
to
examine
for
prevalence
of
law
and
order
and
upholding
the
discipline
[sic]
,”
effectively
giving
them
unfettered
authority
to
enter
private
residences.
Under
the
authority
granted
by
this
provision,
ward
or
village
tract
administrators
typically
carry
out
household
inspections
late
at
night
with
police
or
intelligence
officers
and
others,
ostensibly
to
determine
if
unregistered
guests
are
present.
Given
the
timing
of
these
intrusions,
many
residents
refer
to
the
practice
as
?midnight
inspections”.
Additionally,
individuals
who
lack
adequate
documentation
or
citizenship
status
in
Myanmar
face
challenges
hosting
or
staying
as
overnight
guests.
For
example,
individuals
who
are
unable
to
obtain
household
registration
documents
are
typically
required
to
regularly
report
themselves
to
the
state
as
guests
in
their
own
homes,
often
on
a
weekly
basis.
The
provisions
of
the
Ward or Village Tract Administration Law
related
to
the
guest
registration
requirement
and
its
enforcement
impinge
on
various
human
rights,
including
the
right
to
privacy
and
rights
to
freedom
of
movement,
residency,
and
association.
The
guest
registration
requirement
represents
a
systematic
and
nationwide
breach
of
privacy,
giving
the
government
access
to
troves
of
personal
data
from
communities
across
the
country.
Evidence
collected
by
Fortify
Rights
also
suggests
that
the
law
is
particularly
enforced
against
low-income
communities,
individuals
working
with
civil
society
organizations,
and
political
activists..."
Source/publisher:
Fortify Rights
Date of publication:
2014-03-19
Date of entry/update:
2015-03-19
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to land, property and planning (commentary)
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Local URL:
more
Description:
အကျဉ်းချုပ်
၂၀၁၁ ခုနှစ်တွင် ဦးသိန်းစိန် သမ္မတဖြစ်လာပြီးနောက်၊ မြန်မာနိုင်ငံ၏ နိုင်ငံရေးနှင့် စီးပွားရေး
ပြုပြင်ပြောင်းလဲမှုများသည် နိုင်ငံ၏အနာဂတ်အတွက် ကြီးမားသောလွတ်လပ်မှုများ မကြုံစဖူးသော
အကောင်းမြင်မှုများသို့ ဦးတည်ခဲ့ပါသည်။ သို့ရာတွင် မြန်မာနိုင်ငံတစ်ဝန်းရှိ လူ့အသိုက်အဝန်းများတွင်၊
အာဏာပိုင်များသည် ဖိနှိပ်သောဥပဒေများကို ဆက်လက်ကျင့်သုံးနေပြီး၊ ယခင်စစ်အစိုးရများ
လက်ထက်တွင် ကျင့်သုံးနေကျကိုသာ ဆက်လက်အသုံးချလျက် ရှိပါသည်။
မြို့ပြနှင့် ကျေးလက်တောနယ်၊ မြန်မာဗုဒ္ဓဘာသာနှင့် လူနည်းစုများ၊ ချမ်းသာသူနှင့် ဆင်းရဲသူ အပါအဝင်
ဖြစ်သော မြန်မာနိုင်ငံတွင် နေထိုင်သူအားလုံးသည် ၂၀၁၂ ခုနှစ် ရပ်ကွက် သို့မဟုတ် ကျေးရွာအုပ်စု အုပ်
ချုပ်ရေးဥပဒေ အရ ညဉ့်အိပ်ညဉ့်နေ အိမ်တွင်တည်းခိုသူများကို ရပ်ကွက် သို့မဟုတ် ကျေးရွာအုပ်စု အုပ်
ချုပ်ရေးမှူးအဖြစ် တာဝန်ထမ်းဆောင်နေသော အစိုးရအရာရှိများထံ တိုင်ကြားရန်လိုအပ်ပါသည်။ စင်စစ်
အားဖြင့် ဒေသခံများသည် ညဉ့်အိပ်ညဉ့်နေတည်းခိုမည့်သူများကို လက်ခံနိုင်ရန် နိုင်ငံတော်မှ ခွင့်ပြုချက်
ရယူရန်လိုအပ်ပါသည်၊ အာဏာပိုင်များကလည်း အကြောင်းမျိုးစုံပြပြီး ငြင်းပယ်နိုင်ကြောင်းသိရှိရပါသည်။
မြန်မာအာဏာပိုင်များသည် မကြာခဏနှင့် ပုံမှန်ဆိုသလို အိမ်ထောင်စုများကိုစစ်ဆေးခြင်းဖြင့် တည်း
ခိုသူများကိုတိုင်ကြားရန်လိုအပ်ချက်ကို လိုက်နာကြောင်း သေချာစေပါသည်။ ရပ်ကွက် သို့မဟုတ်
ကျေးရွာအုပ်စု အုပ်ချုပ်ရေးဥပဒေသည် အရာရှိများအား ပုဂ္ဂလိကနေအိမ်များကို ဝင်ရောက်ရန်နှင့်
?တရား ဥပဒေစိုးမိုးရေးနှင့် စည်းကမ်းထိန်းသိမ်းရေးအတွက် စစ်ဆေးရန်လိုအပ်သောနေရာများကို
အခါအား လျော်စွာစစ်ဆေးရန်” အကန့်အသတ်မရှိ အခွင့်အာဏာပေးထားပါသည်။
ဤပြဌာန်းချက်က ခွင့်ပြုထား သော အခွင့်အာဏာအရ ရပ်ကွက်နှင့် ကျေးရွာအုပ်စု
အုပ်ချုပ်ရေးမှူးများသည် ထုံးစံအတိုင်း ဤစစ်ဆေးမှု များကို ညဉ့်နက်သော အခါကျမှ ရဲ သို့မဟုတ်
ထောက်လှမ်းရေးအရာရှိများ၊ အခြားသူများနှင့်အတူ ဧည့်စာရင်းတိုင်ကြားခြင်းမရှိသော ဧည့်သည်များရှိ
မရှိကို စစ်ဆေးရန်အကြောင်းပြ၍ ပြုလုပ်ကြပါသည်။ ဤချင်းနင်းဝင်ရောက်ခြင်းများပြုလုပ်သည့်
အချိန်ကိုထောက်ရှု၍ ဒေသခံများသည် ထိုအလေ့အကျင့်ကို ?ညဉ့်နက် သန်းခေါင်စစ်ဆေးမှုများ”
ဟုရည်ညွှန်းပြောဆိုကြပါသည်
Source/publisher:
Fortify Rights
Date of publication:
2015-03-19
Date of entry/update:
2015-03-19
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to land, property and planning (commentary)
Language:
Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Format :
pdf
Size:
962.04 KB
more
Description:
"All public assemblies that power holders have not themselves organized or endorsed
pose them some kind of political challenge. In a democratic system, unauthorized
public assemblies are part of the political process. The ruling group is obliged to
accommodate such assemblies and not resort to needlessly coercive methods in
dealing with them. The political symbolism of an authoritarian system, by contrast,
carries with it, as James Scott has written, an implicit assumption that subordinates
gather only when they are authorized to do so from above.1 Where subordinates defy
this assumption, they threaten the political order, and risk juridical sanction.
The British authoritarian regime in its Asian colonies assigned public assembly an
inherently criminal quality. A full chapter of the Indian Penal Code, which it brought
with it to Burma, sets out offences against public tranquillity and their punishments.
The terms used in the code evoke the innate criminality of unauthorized gatherings:
?criminal force?, ?rioting?, ?affray?. The colonial-era police and courts read between
these lines so as to enable liberal use of violence. Police and magistrates responded to
unauthorized assembly under cover of the empire?s criminal codes with lathi charges
and rifle fire. When they failed to keep things under control, behind them came the
army. And so, a template was set for what historian Mary Callahan has described as
the ?coercion-intensive? state in Burma.2
1 James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (New Haven & London:
Yale University Press, 1990) 61.
2 Mary P. Callahan, "State Formation in the Shadow of the Raj: Violence, Warfare and Politics in
Colonial Burma," Southeast Asian Studies 39.4 (2002): 521.
2
But the colonial template has, as the years have passed, become less and less familiar.
Whereas the coercive parts of the criminal juridical apparatus in Burma, now
officially Myanmar, have expanded in size and strength under successive military or
military-established governments, the authority of the courts has greatly diminished.
Whereas the criminal codes have remained in force, the manner of their application
has changed markedly. And meanwhile, other ill-defined elements that were not part
of the original template have also entered the mix.
In this paper, I briefly explore the shifting character of the containment and
criminalizing of unauthorized assembly in Myanmar through a case study of the
juridical and extrajuridical response to large-scale protests in 2007. I argue that the
criminalizing of unauthorized assembly and its participants was, compared to earlier
periods, highly ambiguous, because the juridical and extrajuridical elements of the
response were throughout purposefully intervowen. The ambiguity was, I think,
paradigmatic of how power has in recent years been exercised through the criminal
juridical system of Myanmar, such that today we can only talk of the juridical and
extrajudicial in the singular, as a composite of practices rather than two contrasting
sets of practices..."
Nick Cheesman
Source/publisher:
?Southeast Asia: Between the Lines?, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, 9-10 December 2011
Date of publication:
2011-12-10
Date of entry/update:
2014-08-18
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
616.39 KB
Local URL:
more
Description:
"The Asian Human Rights Commission has been following with concern news of the police targeting of gay and transgendered people in Burma, or Myanmar, and has recently obtained detailed information on a number of cases of alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and torture of persons on the grounds of sexual orientation. The AHRC is troubled both by the manner in which this minority group appears to have been deliberately targeted by the police, and by the implications of these police abuses not only for the rights of minorities in democratizing Burma, but also for the rights of all people living there.
According to recent news reports, police in Mandalay have been conducting an operation against gay and transgendered people who have been congregating in certain public places in the city. Although the police claim that they are simply removing from certain areas anyone found to be causing a disturbance to the public, from all accounts it is clear that they have been specifically targeting gay and transgendered people..."
Source/publisher:
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
Date of publication:
2013-07-22
Date of entry/update:
2013-07-22
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Sexual orientation - Discrimination based on, Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to the Military, Police, Fire services etc (commentary)
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
"This special dossier of 36 cases brought under the 1908 Unlawful Associations Act against people
accused of contact with the Kachin Independence Army was researched and compiled in 2012 by
independent human rights defenders in Burma who have requested that the Asian Human Rights
Commission disseminate the material...At a time that the conflict in Kachin State between the Kachin Independence Army and Burma
armed forces is only getting worse, this dossier marks an important contribution to documentation
on human rights abuses in the region, because it signals very sharply the intersection between war
and law, between violence in armed combat and violence in interrogation, in the use of torture
and other techniques against persons who have been branded enemies of the state...the human rights defenders who gathered and translated this material
have two stated objectives: to document and inform people about the use of the Unlawful
Associations Act; and, to secure the release of the accused. Both of these objectives are laudable,
and strongly supported by the AHRC. Clearly, not enough has been done to document cases of
this sort in a way that makes explicit the connection between strategic practices of the military
and those of other parts of the state apparatus for the targeting of internal enemies. We firmly
hope that by taking these steps, not only will the connections be better understood but also those
whose cases are documented will obtain relief through some publicity and attention to their
specific plights..."
Source/publisher:
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) & Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC)
Date of publication:
2013-01-21
Date of entry/update:
2013-01-21
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries), Detentions by the military in conflict areas, Armed conflict in Kachin State - human rights violations
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
2.73 MB
Local URL:
more
Description:
"Burmese President Thein has repealed a draconian law that was used to stifle public speeches and sentence dissidents to lengthy spells in prison under the previous military regime, according to an announcement in a state-owned newspaper on Wednesday.
The Burmese-language version of The New Light of Myanmar carried an announcement signed by President Thein Sein, which stated he had revoked Law 5/96, or the Law Protecting the Peaceful and Systematic Transfer of State Responsibility and the Successful Performance of the Functions of the National Convention against Disturbances and Oppositions.
It provided for up to 20 years imprisonment for anyone who criticizes the government in speeches or written statements that ?belittle the National Convention” and make people misunderstand its proceedings..."
Source/publisher:
"The Irrawaddy"
Date of publication:
2013-01-16
Date of entry/update:
2013-01-19
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
Executive Summary and Recommendations: In July 2012, "ARTICLE 19 analysed the Decree on the Right to Peaceful Assembly and
Peaceful Procession of Myanmar, adopted by the Government of the Republic of the Union of
Myanmar on 5 July 2012.
The provisions of the Decree were examined for their compliance with international standards
on human rights. Myanmar has neither signed nor ratified the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights or other principal human rights treaties. Nevertheless, ARTICLE 19
suggests that guarantees to the right to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, as
provided by Article 364 of the Constitution of Myanmar, allow a wide scope for interpretation
and that international standards regarding these rights should provide guidance to such an
interpretation.
In the analysis, ARTICLE 19 appreciates the Decree?s recognition of the state duty to protect
assembly participants. However, the requirement for permission to hold an assembly, the
grounds for denying permission, the lack of a court appeal and the absence of guarantees for
media access to assemblies are problematic and must be urgently revised. ARTICLE 19 also
calls on the Government of Myanmar ? in consultation with civil society - to review other
legislative measures in light of international standards and to make them compliant with
these standards.
Recommendations
ARTICLE 19 calls on the Government of Myanmar:
• To sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
• To invite the UN special rapporteur on freedom of peaceful assembly and association
and the special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression to visit Myanmar;
• To ensure that the right to peaceful assembly and the right to freedom of expression
are safeguarded in line with international standards;
• To revise the Decree on the Right to Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession in
accordance with international standards on freedom of expression and freedom of
assembly, as recommended by ARTICLE 19;
• To initiate public discussion about the current legal framework on peaceful assemblies
and engage in consultation with civil society representatives on how to improve the
relevant legislation.
ARTICLE 19 calls on civil society in Myanmar:
• To engage in public debates and consultation with the government on how to improve
the domestic legislation on peaceful assembly;
• To form coalitions between civil society organisations and launch public education
campaigns on the right to peaceful assembly and the right to freedom of expression;
• To draft legislative proposals and advocate for specific changes in domestic legislation
aiming at the improvement of the protection of the right to peaceful assembly and the
right to freedom of expression;
• To seek partnerships with international organisations in a specific mandate on the
right to freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly."
Source/publisher:
Article 19
Date of publication:
2012-09-20
Date of entry/update:
2012-09-24
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Freedom of opinion and expression: - the situation in Burma/Myanmar - reports, analyses, recommendations, Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association, violations of, Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to association and assembly (commentaries), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to opinion and expression (commentary)
Language:
English, Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Local URL:
more
Description:
"...Legal Reforms Should Meet International Human Rights Standards
...Burma?s new law on assembly rejects the previous ban on demonstrations, but still allows the government to trump the Burmese people?s basic rights. There is a lot of excitement about changes in Burma these days, but the government shouldn?t be given credit for allowing some freedom just because none existed before. Instead, it should be pressed to make sure its laws meet international standards..."
Source/publisher:
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
Date of publication:
2012-03-15
Date of entry/update:
2012-03-17
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more